Is He Right?

>>138146588
In a sense. The problem is you can't tolerate things that lead to other real problems as well. Tolerating the raping of children doesn't lead to intolerance, but leads to other problems in society. Tolerance is a tool to be used sparingly, not an ideology you should embrace.

File: 149982227364.jpg (263KB, 764x551px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 764x551px

>>138146588
>Defending tolerance requires to not tolerate the intolerant
Which then makes you intolerant and must not be tolerated.
Logical error.

File: 1501987305787.jpg (30KB, 311x320px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 311x320px

>look on wikipedia
>he's jewish

no wonder he came up with this nonsense

>>138146588

It cuts both ways.

>>138146588
this only works if you assume that you are the only person that is allowed to use this logic

>>138146588
it works if you replace nazis with muslims

File: intolerant muslims.jpg (127KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 800x1000px

>>138147635

>>138147666
yup

>>138146588

We wouldn't have this problem if they enforced this intolerance for the intolerant equally to every shitty cause.

>>138146588
so in that case, when do the progressives stop tolerating blacks and muslims?

>>138146588
Switch the swastika to the antifa symbol.
Would be a great meme and accurate with the leftist media tolerating the intolerant Antifa by not reporting any of their crimes these days.

File: Left-ItsLoveWhenWeDoIt.jpg (103KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 960x960px

>>138146588
1). Label your opposition as fascist/nazis/racist/sexist/islamophobic/homophobic/etc even if none of these things are true

2). Say that hate speech can not be tolerated

3). Be intolerant fuckheads

So yeah, fuck you OP. Fuck you you fucking piece of shit.

>>138147086
This...
HE gets to decide who is intolerant and who is tolerant, but if YOU start deciding that yourself, you're OUTSIDE THE LAW and must be eliminated.

Horrifying.

>>138146588
>checked

I feel like this paradox could apply to any ideology that promotes a sense of superiority. National socialism asserted aryan superiority and led to millions of deaths. Communism creates a class division which turns to hate, which through history has killed 100's of millions. Islam is designed for conquest and there have been several attacks resulting in death in the past 72 hours attributed to followers of Islam. Judaism regards all non Jews to be goyim, cattle to be used to serve them. If you give credence to this paradox then you are going to need to do a lot of killing, eventually even your self, which I guess is a part of why it's a paradox

>>138147666
Well done Ben

>>138146588
We already have limits to tolerance and its based not the political oppions you don't like, you cum-guzzling, cocksucking piece of shit. It's based on actions. Speech is allowed as it doesn't incite violence like BLM saying they want cops dead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgBnB0341e4

>>138146588
Its the pilpul in action. This image is a great example of the pilpul and how jews use it to justify their actions

Notice how a meaningless, paradoxical, non-argument is posed, which leads the author to the (((conclusion))) that we must not tolerate the intolerant. Of course, it is easy to find an argument supporting any conclusion if that argument is fake

Philosophy in general is a bunch of horseshit

>>138146588
Well it would be right if it went both ways.
You see, AntiFa has a monopoly on violence, while they claim to be "against facism" forcefully forcing their believe on EBUL NATSEEs is a considerable facette of Facism. because Facism is against Individuality.

>>138146588
>Karl Pooper

>>138146588
Is this the intolerance to intolerance you were talking about, OP?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVNUn1_SE5s

Yes it is. If you had an honest bone in your body, you'd admit this what you're talking about.