Biggest offensive against internet free speech ever

cantwell was a weak whimpering faggot. he was deadweight.

>>138126166
>Hatreon kicked out
This is some bullshit. What the fuck, it was just a patreon alternative.

>>138126166
So?
It seems that the people really don't like the Nazis, and only tolerated them before because they thought they are completely impotent.

CIAniggers btfo

>>138126425
Still he's been targeted non the less for being associated to the alt-right

>>138126435
Yep, just like it sounds. It's all part of kicking alternative ideas out of the market, denying market access.

https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/16/digital-ocean-and-cloudflare-ditch-neo-nazi-client-the-daily-stormer/

>>138126166
Capitalism in action, friend. If you don't like it, you must be some sort of authoritarian commie.

>>138126166
Can't wait until they remove 4chan, 8ch and r/T_D all on the same day.

File: 160928.jpg (114KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1920x1080px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZrAYxWPN6c

File: Animation-2.gif (25KB, 1200x200px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1200x200px

>>138126166
This is probably happening because Burgerland will be going into a depression during the next few months.
Pic related is the auto-loan bubble peaking. Data from january2016 to july 2017

>>138126950
Capitalism is about meeting market demands, not about sacrificing profit for "values", that is what commies do and what those tech companies are doing, they are sacrificing profit and attempting to close down other existing markets by denying market service.

>>138126166
What's the end game? Will right wingers have to spread ideas through writing and meetups now?

>>138127096
They beta test this with dailystormer and TRS... no one stands up for them, because "they are nazis" and next it's every other platform and individual including those with messages that are virtually harmless.

>>138127485
There are alternatives to cloudflare and DO. Still, dark times ahead for free expression.

>>138127823
That's exactly what it is. Just wait for them to just start removing their competition, too.

>>138126898
>Earlier today cloud hosting platform DigitalOcean was publicly called out on Twitter for providing services to both The Daily Stormer and pro-hate speech crowdfunding platform Hatreon.
>pro-hate speech crowdfunding platform Hatreon.
"Free speech is hate speech"
"If you don't hate speech, you're pro-hate speech"
Fuck techcrunch.

>>138127905
Certainly there are other hosting companies, and it's not the first time these sites have been asked to leave by a specific hosting company, but this case is much more serious than this, no registrar will register Dailystormer's domain they have been denied by at least 3 services, and Cloudflare is to the anti-DDoS industry what Facebook is to social media and google to search engines.

>>138126166
wow, im american and dude this is crazy- we're truly in a dystopia. IMO we're too deep too change anything- the jew controls everything. but realizing how true it is is insane. this cyber non-platforming altright associated companies is the US equivalent of it being illegal to deny to holocaust in germany. i say this all this time but we truly live in a dystopia- the one that we read about in books and see in movies. complete dystopia. anything antijew is shutdown. they have their own entire fucking state and have their tentacles around the US entirely. strange fucking timeline. really weird shit.

File: 1499082176266.jpg (137KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1280x720px

>>138126166
Just use tor/i2p/ipfs/gnunet/freenet or whatever else. The more support these decentralised approaches get, the bigger the chance that the old internet dies.

File: 4chan gets shut down.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>138127823
This means we are getting really close to a big happening.

Expect something big within 6 months of the real digital shoah. I'm talking on the scale of an economic crisis that burgers can't print themselves out of.

They want us offline because we would be vindicated as predicting this at least 2 years in advance.

Reddit already practically worships us. Imagine what would happen if a big economic happening proved us right.

File: 1482858962050.jpg (156KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1920x1080px

>>138128772
>we're truly in a dystopia
Did you realise it just now? Certain numbers have been illegal for decades.

What's going on with this board? Refugees or under attack? Everything's loading slow for me.

>>138127485
Capitalism and free speech both require competition in the marketpkace. When only a handful of companies, monopolies in some sectors and cartels in others, control the internet and provide access, that access is not going to be available to those who dissent from the monopolists or cartels. Antitrust action could increase market competition and thus availability of services to non-mainstream thought.

>>138127485
The market demands that they don't want to share the internet with fascists, and the businessmen are complying. The Invisible Hand is giving you the Invisible Finger.

What, you thought that free markets meant freedom? Haha, how quaint.

>>138129034
certain numbers??
and ive realized it about a year ago- but its just now fully hitting me how fucked we are. really when i saw the GOY, BYE i went: fuck

File: 1502813011956.jpg (141KB, 650x755px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 650x755px

>>138126166
hmmmmmmmmm but every second post in here tells me the alt-right is rapidly rising and soon to reach 347,100,942 members :) :) :)

>>138126950
>silicon valley censorship
ancraps btfo forever

>>138127485
Capitalism is about enriching jews. Always has been.

>>138126166
Genuinely offensive sites and the more scholarly sites are still around. (I won't post names for obvious reasons.) They're concentrating fire on sites that have or are capable of organizing people and resources in real life. These are are not opportunistic or symbolic attacks, they are definitely strategic.

I'm sure the sites that organize antifa violence are totally unaffected for some mysterious reason.

>>138126166
this is what happens when you let 6 companies own every prominent company on the internet.

>>138129584
prominent web service*

>>138126166
They want us to get off the computer.

>>138128827
tor etc spooks neophytes who imagine it's all CP degeneracy and illicit drugs. Chilling effect has been powerful. None are idiotproof.

>>138129360
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

>>138128772
It won't be just anti-jew stuff soon. Gab is also being denied access to Apple and android app market, effectively being shun by the market.

>>138128827
I think the dailystormer has announced it will be moving to the deep web, at least until it can fix this issue, the question is: is this a viable solution be it for them or anyone else in the business of reaching people with information.

And why should we tolerate these tech cucks kicking anyone who is not a shitlib out of the web, first is dailystormer and TRS, then gab, then 4chan, then the Lauren Southerns of the world, then infowars, and anyone with a different opinion no matter how lite it is.

File: tumblr_nr1378avX81ua9i0to1_500.jpg (32KB, 500x464px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x464px

>>138129463
i have a prophey that (faggot)peter thiel(faggot) will start funding all these alt tech companies and then there being some big platform shift between people

>>138129673
lol thats confusing but i think they're saying all speech in digital format is transmitted and numbers so can be illegal wtf i dont get it im a lil drunk right now

>>138129781
Antitrust regulation: a market that can coordinate to deny speech is not a free market nor one with healthy competition, but rather a cartel. Play the anti-corporate card and call for antitrust regulation of the tech industry.

>>138129781
They'll keep infowars because its controlled OP.

File: 1484281017902.jpg (38KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x480px

>>138129360
>certain numbers??
Every program that you run and every kind of data that you see on your PC is just that: numbers.
If you want an example check the copyright, UK loli, CP, and speech censorship laws: they are just that, laws that ban numbers - a thoughtcrime.
Also, related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_prime

>>138129781
>first is dailystormer and TRS, then gab, then 4chan, then the Lauren Southerns of the world, then infowars, and anyone with a different opinion no matter how lite it is.
That would actually be great as more people would realise how much the centralised model of the current web sucks and more people would start moving to decentralised approaches.
They might stop kicking sites that they disagree with for now if enough people rally against them, but the real problem will remain for as long as they have the ability to remove any site at will.

>>138130212
It's not a free market if there is corporate law.

File: 5995635514000020002c3339[1].png (380KB, 720x354px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 720x354px

>>138129176
Trump should take anti-trust action against the tech gigants like people like Alex Jones and Roger Stone have been calling for, if Trump does not do it now, no one will, ever.

>>138129533
This is true. Sites like infowars for example may be powerfull in media, but they are useless when it comes to mobilizations, the same with the rest of the so called alt-lite, they amass a lot of internet traffic, much more than the alt-right sites but they are incapable of mobilizing anything just look at Jack Posobiec recent goofy freak show.

File: 1490540001702.jpg (54KB, 1130x678px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1130x678px

>>138126166
Someone with a lot of money is lobbying a lot of sites to shut it down. Most likely a Soros type.

>>138130872
A market with regulatory intervention to prevent monopolies or cartels is freer than a market that can collude to exclude customers.

>>138131135
>Trump should take anti-trust action against the tech gigants like people like Alex Jones and Roger Stone have been calling for, if Trump does not do it now, no one will, ever.
He should have done it before. If he tries to do it now, they'll crucify him because it will be easily portrayed as him defending "alt-right hate speech platforms" and he'll be stopped.

>>138131759
He may be stopped but this would sway many average Americans towards free expression and conservative views.

File: 1503057947653m.jpg (65KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1024x576px

>>138126166
It's the rest of us that are "politically incorrect" - you nignogs are straight up Nazis
>Google did nothing wrong

>>138127485
>Capitalism is about meeting market demands, not about sacrificing profit for "values", that is what commies do and what those tech companies are doing, they are sacrificing profit and attempting to close down other existing markets by denying market service.

This isn't true. All major companies have a vision, a set of values to guide them. This helps them position themselves in the market and different themselves from the competition. Part of that vision is what they don't want to do.

In this situation companies don't want to associate with Nazism and so they don't have to host these sites. In addition, they probably believe the backfire from supporting these sites will cause them to lose revenue when people chose other firms over them, firms that don't support Nazis. The "market demand" is anti-Nazi platforms.

Personally I am really happy these co. are banning these alt-right sources. It'll finally make libertarians and anarchist cuck realize that they need the govt to protect them from corporations.

>>138131759
People want him to be bold. His support for the Confederate statues has gained him popularity no matter what the press, and cucked politicians say, it's like when he came out with his anti-immigration speech against Mexicans, he was over then, and that is what actually got him the big crowds.

>>138131580
If cartels try to collude there is a huge financial incentive to be the first one to break away from the deal and undercut everyone else.

>>138131135
>Jack Posobiec recent goofy freak show.
The Mayor agreed with them and the statue is coming down. You psychos got a girl killed, dozens injured, 2 Presidential councils dissolved and the cabinet restructured. You have no idea what's coming for you. But yes, continue memeing

>>138132485
Those companies don't compete in the market, they are the market. So no.

>>138126166
> muh free speechez!!
> diz ib zenzorshiip!
if somebodyt owns a business and doesnt want your shit stinking up their domain, they can, and shoould tell you to fuck off

since you dont understand this, yet brandish that faggy meme flag, you prove that you are just a low grade moron with aspirations of being a retard .

suck my dick and swallow the load, you degenerate crybaby
if you want your idiotic opinions published and nobody will put your weak ass shit on their platform, go create your own and stop crying like a little bitch

iif the market doesnt want what youre selling, go set up your own market, and when that fails, try to figure out why your shit iis so widely rejected.

ill give you a hint:
"anarcho-capitalism" is a special snowflake bullshit rebranding of the same pold marxist bullshit, created by (((Murray Rothbard))) a lifelong communist in capitalist drag.
anyone with a functional brain recognizes that anarchy is poison to markets and capital, so youre just a dipshit

Funny how the "chosen" ones cry about getting passed over. If you are so superior why are you losing. If you beliefs are true then you should have no problem....... oh wait it's the Jews. Fucking Clown shoes.

>>138131580
>A market with regulatory intervention to prevent monopolies or cartels is freer than a market that can collude to exclude customers.

sounds like a misapplication of economic theory. Anti-trust regulation and monopolies applies to situations where a company is restricting access to a good/service because that will increase the price paid.

Google and these providers are not restricting service to increase revenue but because they do not want to associate with said groups. Anti-trust regulation would do nothing to solve this situation. Instead you would need to enact utility legislation to regulate these business directly.

>>138133016
>Those companies don't compete in the market, they are the market. So no.

Semantics. They are the market because this is an example of natural monopolies.

Markets can tend to perfect competitive or to monopoly or anywhere in between.

>>138132695
Only in markets where you sell separable products. Consider social media: the value of an account is limited by its reach within the network, so networks become walled gardens hoping to exclude competition. Twitter isn't connected to any federated messaging service, and no competition can connect to its network, so Twitter users have an incentive to remain with the service as they becomevoiceless to millions by switching to any competitor. Antitrust regulation could force Twitter to allow competitors to authenticate users and share messages: gab and Twitter could interact, and Twitter would lose the ability to kick out the right.

>>138133323
Attack it from the other end: Google and friends create monopolies and cartels in advertising. They raise ad prices by creating walled gardens. That's how you get to the economic damage side of anti-trust.

>>138133221
I think you are the one that does not seem to understand, the market does want what is being sold, the problem is some people are going out of their way to deny access to the product which the market is demanding.

>>138133288
I think you've been watching too much Young Turds

>>138133526
> build something
> people like it
> nobody wants your weak ass knockoffs
> dat ib an molopoly!! gubbmint cum make dem share their shit wiff meeez!!
another idiot who doesnt understand that the service IS the pproduct and they dont have to make their shit interact with your shitty knockoff of their service if they dont want to.
if the market demands twatter expose itself to the endless wall of shitposting that is "black twitter", then niggertry becomes part of the service
if the market were to demand that whatever shitty service you are shilling for become part of twatter, then twatter will either compete or merge.
either way, your demands that your crappy little copy of twatter become a portal to twatter's system is just crybaby whining because youre losing.
and losers never win.
so sad.
many such stories

>>138133884
>I think you are the one that does not seem to understand, the market does want what is being sold, the problem is some people are going out of their way to deny access to the product which the market is demanding.

1. There are people in "the market" that want Google and other co. to host Nazis and there are people that don't want them to host Nazis.

2. Firms do not have to complete in all market segments. Companies can CHOOSE if they want to be in the Nazi segment or not.

>>138133856

Firms cannot "create" monopolies. Monopoly situations exists because of external factors such as most people being too lazy to learn about competition search engines or economics of scale from being the largest and having the most manpower to develop the best algorithm.

>>138133288
You wouldn't have to ban things if they weren't true and impossible to refute. The Jews are really showing their true face which will be their undoing unless there some counter to it within the Jewish community who show gratitude to all white people who died to save them and gave them a home. Reject all crazy Jews. Work against them and don't let them speak in your name.

>>138133884
> dem ebil corporashunz R blockign muh sheeeeiiit.
> das rayciss
> we wuz kangz an sheeit,
> You Didnt Build That!!
when you go full retard from "anarcho-capitalist" you step over the imaginary lline separating your (((murray rothbard))) crypto communism from plain old ordinary leninism.

and thats how we can see "anarcho-capitalism" is simply crypto-marxism

>>138130471
>That would actually be great as more people would realise how much the centralised model of the current web sucks and more people would start moving to decentralised approaches.
I disagree. It will accelerate the--for lack of a better term--gentrification of the internet that's been happening for a couple of decades. There's ongoing effort to turn it into nothing but a sanitized, interactive television distribution platform for old and "new" media, with integrated narcissist-friendly social media components. imageboards, chans, dailystormer, trs, forums, irc, etc; none have become significantly more offensive, but popular perception of the internet has changed as its user demographics and platforms changed. And it really didn't take that long. When they're gone, people will quickly acclimate to the new normal. Eternal vigilance and all that.

>>138132530
I hope you're right and the tech monopolies can be handled.

>>138135041
Enjoy supporting a centralised medium that can be censored at any time then.

>>138135242
enjoy sucking my cock.
i dont give a shit whhat the new york times prints, nor do i give a wet shit for what fags on stormfront say.
if booth publications vanished tonight, my life wouldnt change a bit.

Protip: you dont need "media"
"media" is just some cunt in an editorial board deciding what you should see and what you should think about it.
learn to find information for yourself, without your twatter feed or cnn's fake news

>>138126166
DS is back at dailystormer.lol and I think they're still working on getting the .com back
TRS is up
Hatreon is back up
Red Ice TV will be back up this weekend
Rootbocks is still down
and Cantwell may be facing some trumped up charges

File: 1497584911026.jpg (31KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 853x480px

>>138135708
Cool? How is this relevant to my post?

>>138135242
I'm not opposed to decentralized platforms, but I'm not convinced blacklisting sites will drive more people toward decentralization.

>>138128577
A russian/chink hosting company won't care

>AnCap complaining about companies denying service to individuals
Oh my kek

>>138126166
The "free world" is desperate when they must finally take measures such as these. It will be the spark of nationalists creating their own services. Then the nationalists will become a truly independent and way more potent subversive element. This "divorce" had to happen at some point anyway.

>>138129405
Which is why REAL action must be taken against them. We wouldn't actually allow change now, would we?

>>138137294
but we have all the political power as republicans right now. all we need to do is show them what we want. look how fast the government reacted when just 10 people showed up to protest the linen statue. next day there was action on it. So instead of asking for statues to be taken down you should really be thinking about what you really want.

>>138137545
I think the easiest one we could get done quickly is campaign finance reform. get the big money out of government politics. corporations are not people.

>>138135953
did you even read what you wrote?
> smug address: enjoy "supporting" X that i dont approve of
> haughty rapprochement : X i disapprove of is "centralized" implying there is no alternative
> bullshit reductio ad retardum (not a typo, figure it out): it's censorship!! demonstrating that you dont know the difference between state control and self control
> overall stupidity runs throughout: implying that "media" is some god-given riight that Shall Not Be Infringed, like lefties claim for "healthcare" when they really mean forcing people to buy medical insurance from a private company, and you are oblivious to the irony

ill spell it out gaylord.
obongo forces me to buy shit from a private company or face the wrath of the govt.

YOU want to force private companies to accept mountains of worthless shit from idiots like you, or face hysterical claims that the govt should force them to host your crap or it's "censorship"

both are equally unconstitutional, but at least obongo had some kind of twisted flawed logic behind his bullshit, youre just mad nobody can read your white power blog without searching tor for your personal CP and opinion page

File: tuesday.jpg (49KB, 588x553px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 588x553px

>>138126166
Lol, banhammered. The irony of the greatest amount butthurt ever witnessed is courtesy of the lolcows of /pol/.

>>138137917
/pol/ is one ideology. youre a fucking faggot. this is a free flowing forum, probably the last place on the internet where you can spread ideas all you want without someone telling you not to.

>>138126166
this racist ass site still going strong though

>>138136355
They were dropped from a Russian host recently

File: The Violent Alt Left.png (1MB, 1228x1540px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1228x1540px

>>138126166
>Hatereon a crowdfounding alternative to patreon for politically incorrect speech:
>>kicked out by its host DigitalOcean

So much for "just create alternatives".

The corporations are all cooperating on this so much that to build one website with controversial speech you first need to build the entire infrastructure the rest of the net uses.

You can't crowdfund your effort because you need a domain registrar but you also need to build a CloudFlare alternative and you also need to build a hosting alternative and you also need to hope the rest of the net doesn't de-list you.. it's an endless circle of death. Oh and then your payment handlers (creditcard processors, paypal) won't let you use them so you need to invent alternatives to the entire fucking financial institution.

This is a practical example of how AnCaps are wrong. If all business decides to conspire against you, you are utterly fucked. You are deplatformed from life and unless you happen to be a billionaire you don't have the money to create alternatives.

>>138138195
scratch that, without someone completely censoring them. do you really want to stop the flow of ideas? the only way to progress is through controversial ideas. Its how the leftists were allowed to the point they are today. we allowed it. and now all of a sudden people arent allowed to have dissenting opinions? what are you a fucking nazi?

>>138138393
I'm sure there's some host in some third world country that will be fine with keeping their sites up. It's just a matter of time before Dailystormer pops back up with a Kazakh TLD or some shit

File: 1500388639000.png (789KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 1280x720px

>>138137832
>implying there is no alternative
Wut? I listed quite a few alternatives in a previous post in this thread.

>it's censorship!!
How is it not?

>implying that "media" is some god-given riight that Shall Not Be Infringed
Where did I imply that exactly?

>obongo forces me to buy shit from a private company or face the wrath of the govt.
Ok, sure? How is it relevant to my post?

>YOU want to force private companies to accept mountains of worthless shit
Do I really? I simply proposed a few decentralised censorship-resistant replacements.

>or face hysterical claims that the govt should force them to host your crap or it's "censorship"
When did I say that I want that?

>both are equally unconstitutional
There isn't a universal constitution.

Are you on drugs? And why do you put spaces at the end of your lines?

File: stalin-smiling.jpg (70KB, 344x400px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 344x400px

>>138138393

>WWII
>Alt Left

Wouldn't the Soviets be the Alt Left in that scenario?

>>138138785
these sites got shutdown because they were too dumb to build their own infrastructure. if even one of those idiots on that website knew anything about IT they would have their own servers.

Decentralized net coming soon kiddos look into Shiftnrg it's launching in September.

>>138138785
>It's just a matter of time before Dailystormer pops back up
dailystormer.lol

>>138139095
it is decentralized idiot. you just have to have a little bit of smarts to do it. not even a lot.

>>138139137
Yes. What about it?

Hell, it's technically still up as an onion.

>>138126542
(((people))) u kike faggot speak as if there was a vote to ban us from talking. Must have voted in israel, hey kike?

>>138139137
>dailystormer.lol
oh I get it, my bad. I'm a dumbfuck

>>138127314
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oocfKco3CxI

very relevant

>>138129481
this

>>138126166
It's almost as if CVille was a false flag

>>138126166
Hate speech is being fought wherever it rears its head. This is how it should be. These are the consequences for running your mouths and letting vitriol spew out for so long.

>>138138393
To be fair, alternatives are going to arrive very shortly simply due to all the shekels at stake. Marxists won't stop here, all conservatives will find themselves shut down on social media, etc. for hate. Then competitors who aren't so brain dead will arise.

>>138132469
oy vey, u hate jews so u don't deserve free speech. Now listen up while i tell u with a straight face that palestine never existed

>>138139546
Wow, so brave. Faggot.

File: iq5.jpg (44KB, 580x381px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 580x381px

>>138139546
> These are the consequences for running your mouths and letting vitriol spew out for so long.

Shut up nigger. Go get gassed. Also check out this chart. Deal with it.

Don't forget 4chan was booted from the .net domain from GoDaddy because some SA faggot snitched like a bitch nigger to GoDaddy due to "moot hosting CP".

>>138139546
really brought a tear to my eye

>>138139546
(((running your mouths)))
this is how you get actual nazis instead of retarded frog cultists

>>138139546
I hope a feral nigger breaks into your house and rapes you

>>138139546
corporations deciding what is or not allowed on the internet is about as bad of a system as you could imagine. good thing trump removed net neutrality so those cable companies can also censor the internet no matter who owns the servers that host the information, not. both sides work against us.

>>138140575
We gotta nationalize social media so we can be cannot be denied their services- like Bannon suggested.

>>138126542
You want 1984 to happen don't you

>>138126166
Crazy that when you own stuff that people rent you can put restrictions on what they can do with your property huh?

File: e8777e021aad432a34f1456938c4598f7591a5525a330534d8b22ec59c5288ca.gif (496KB, 500x360px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 500x360px

>>138126166
oh wow wee, more newfriends. wonder what will happen if they decide to axe 4 chan with its much larger population plus those.

>>138140869
Yes.

>>138126435
same reason vice banned "far-right archiving websites."

>>138140779
just leave net neutrality. If you want to put shit on the internet the more people that see it the more it will cost but at least the internet providers cant just say fuck off whenever they feel like it. they are the same companies that pretty much hate the free flow of information. they want a one way flow of ideas and information.

>>138136512
And that is what Rootbocks and Hateron are but still they try to stop these platforms anyway they can they can.

>>138135929
Good to hear it. Non the less this is a warning of how potentially dangerous the tech cucks can be, if they were to make a coordinated attack they could potentially be very disruptive.

File: Sad Pepe.png (2MB, 1280x984px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x984px

>>138139575
>To be fair, alternatives are going to arrive very shortly

Initially I would have agreed with you. Hatreon seemed to be showing that the system worked as advertised.

But again the point is that they're now kicked off. And payment processors are starting to kick people off too. The amount of infrastructure needed to create a new Patreon was a bit hard, the infrastructure to build an entire host of services from DNS registrars to webhosts to payment processors, is really fucking hard and the costs are in the millions.

And you're just assuming they won't unleash the secondary set of weapons they've already talked about - removing sites from the registry or individual ISPs blocking IPs.

You're already in a situation where you only have one ISP in many areas, so what's your response now? Just build another ISP?

The consequences of this is so fucking dark and dystopian, there's a reason they've had a gentleman's agreement never to use these options. This is like nukes being fired when it comes to deplatforming. And it's not even part of the national conversation in that way because they're so shortsighted they think this is a power anyone can be trusted with. If they were delisting BLM or Antifa or even radical jihadis, you fucking KNOW there would be a screech among all leftists about the death of liberty.
But because it's nazis, it's okay and can't possibly go wrong.

File: 1501282161661.png (481KB, 1500x962px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1500x962px

>>138132530
>you actually believe this

>>138139546
If you don't accept what was said, the hate goes right back into speaker's mouth
You should avoid negativity, and defend yourself if neccessary

so long as religionofpeace stays online.

>>138139835
GoDaddy are the biggest kikes, not to mention their overpriced domains and shitty customer service. Do you know who is 4chan's current registrar?

>>138141391
>no mass deportations
>no drain the swamp when hes imposed lobbying bans
>its his job to fix demographics not my job to have white kids

Do you even follow the news? How much do you get paid to post and where do I sign up?

>>138141386
I guess you haven't heard of ethereum coins. You should look into the ethereum system. its a wonder decentralized way to fund whatever you want. thank me later.

>>138141875

Bitcoin is already the primary method of transfer of funds for the Alt-right.

>>138126166
Good.

Groups like ISIS and the alt-right should not be tolerated.

>>138142102
you dont even know what I am talking about.

>>138141386
>>The consequences of this is so fucking dark and dystopian, there's a reason they've had a gentleman's agreement never to use these options.
it's also this way because of larger political battles between ISPs.

for example, imagine the agreement between a british ISP and a german ISP on the traffic flowing between them. can you imagine how many political issues would come up? now think of the agreement between an american ISP and a japanese ISP. or a syrian ISP and an israeli ISP.

culture differences are already bad enough, think of how bad things will get when the actual content flowing between ISPs comes up for debate. at the moment your typical german ISP doesn't know that it's peering arrangement is being used to transfer images and videos of hitler. what will change when it is encouraged to monitor all content as well as metadata?

what, now instead of the german ISP having a few quarrels with the british ISP over technical policy, the full brunt of WW2 is going to come into play? now the british ISP has to monitor everything it sends out just in case it might send out an image of hitler? how do you get your hitler image to poland, then? are you going to send it to russia first? what if the image is critical of the soviet union?

this stuff is scary.

>>138141391
>Stops TTP
> Breaks with Paris accords
>Rise in real deportations, though I agree very small in number still
>Stopped investigation into right wing groups
> Implicitly attacks dispossession of whites by defending confederate monuments

Also give him time, lock her up may still come in due time. In general those who have failed are those who are bellow him, Sessions, Bannon, etc.

>>138142413
Feels like a concerted effort from the outside to balkanize us.

This is why making real life networks is very important. They're driving everyone underground.
The leftists of the Bush era that kvetched about this stuff previously are eerily silent or supportive.

1984 is here.

And the biggest irony of it all is that leftists would agree, except that they completely misunderstand the meaning of the book and somehow believe Trump represents Big Brother because "hes racist".

>>138143333
you got quads.

>>138129481
Funny, Soviet Communism was originally about the exact same thing. (((coincidence)))

>>138126166
They seem to be afraid these ideas will spread. That suggests the ideas are strong.

They seem to be afraid that they cannot counterargue these ideas with their own ideas. That suggests that their ideas are weak.

>>138126166
First they came for the nazis, but I didn't speak up, because ...

>>138145791
Oh wow we better stop jailing criminals or else they might start jailing innocent people.

>>138145232
I figured communism was more about giving jews ultimate power so they could kill tens of millions of goyim, and capitalism was about them making money