Brit/pol/ - ÆLFRED REX edition

File: For_ReadingUpdate1.png (252KB, 1070x612px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1070x612px

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4by48e2cjy3ax4z/AADW5fTa8MP7lsuQJX1gUBHZa?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/e0xhh59m4wvb01j/Somerset%20v%20Stewart%20%281772%29.pdf?dl=0

Who would win in a fight to the death between Nick Clegg and Jeremy Corbyn?

Detailed answers only.

File: CharlesII2.jpg (14KB, 448x312px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 448x312px

>>138106674
habsburg*

File: anon supremacy.jpg (203KB, 1200x949px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1200x949px

Put the tripfags in their place.

Lads, Granville Thorndyke, the creator of this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdFzMLZAXEM&index=39&

has been erased from Youtube, perhaps by his own doing

File: king george 3.jpg (656KB, 1487x2159px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 1487x2159px

>>138106521

File: IMG_2796.png (707KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 750x1334px

Why are there so many lefty faggots everywhere?

Is it the Jews?

>>138106784
hapsburg is the correct spelling

also

>not getting the point

File: Cuppa Pepe.png (1MB, 2250x2150px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2250x2150px

>>138106824
Rimmer is a good lad and Honk is just a cutie namefag.

>>138106521
Why isn't this a William of Orange edition?

>>138106824
Empty seat should be YKTD.

>>138107007
>perhaps by his own doing
What do you mean by that?

>>138107041
Id like to see her actual results, out of curiosity

>>138107041

>don't say mean things about Muslims or they will kill you, ok?
>t. dumb paki

File: King Athelsten (1).jpg (37KB, 188x300px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 188x300px

>>138107009
1. King Alfred the Great
2. King Athelstan
3. King Edward I
4. Henry II
5. Henry VIII (will be highly disagreed with).

>>138107367
DUP

>>138107310
I think the videos have been unlisted, and his profile picture has changed. If it was the powers that be, his channel would simply be erased

File: Henry VIII.jpg (488KB, 834x999px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 834x999px

>>138107427

>will be highly disagreed with

Only people who think it was divorce and not annulment (which he was fully right to request) will disagree, plus the Pope playing favourites.

File: 1098754303.png (330KB, 520x539px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 520x539px

>>138107490

Brushing up on my tripjew history what actually happened to yktd

>>138107041
Yes and no.

They are behind the scenes pulling the strings, but there simply aren't enough of them to do all the dirty work. They have useful goyim who dance like monkeys and do their bidding.

Basically, the Jews convinced us that committing a violent civilisational murder-suicide was noble and virtuous. They loaded the gun and handed it to us, but it was malleable (goy) morons who pulled the trigger. People like Blair, the smug housewives on Mumsnet, Lily Allen, etc. are the ones who really doomed us.

File: yoursign.jpg (24KB, 360x576px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 360x576px

>>138107712

>>138107041
i bet she's taking electronics

>>138107887
I suppose judgement is coming

>>138107644
Think we spoke on this the other day mate. What is you? Those idiots were believing primary school tier knowledge on Henry VIII and believed he was a fat cunt who broke ties with a Church deeply embedded into England (and Britain) because he was horny.

Truly one of the greatest kings we've had. One of the most powerful too, if we judge based off their own times. Similar to Romans being slandered by historians like Suetonius after their death, Henry VIII suffered the same fate. .

>>138107644
>Pope playing favourites.

Probably more down to the Pope being the prisoner of the Holy Roman Emperor

>>138108357
Was it you*

>woman calls in
>tune out

>>138108357
Most people literally, unironically have a primary school tier understanding of history. Everybody thinks I'm some sort of history genius just because I have what should be standard historical knowledge.

>>138107114
Habsburg is the correct spelling, you twat

>>138108357
>Truly one of the greatest kings we've had.

He very nearly converted Britain to Judaism...

>>138108059
killed himself then?

>>138108669
secondary school history is shit all i learned about was slavery, the blitz, women getting the vote and segregation

>>138108596
>tune in again
>she's tell us about how she's the only woman on a board
>tune out again

Everyone is a stereotype now.

>>138109012
>muh slavery
>muh 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
>muh womyn
>muh niggers

I also remember doing stuff about the Poor Law Ammendment Act and sewers and all that shite. Basically "laissez-faire is evil, muh big state solves everything".

File: eliot.jpg (197KB, 1245x1400px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1245x1400px

>>138109012
>women getting the vote
>tfw they never told you that working class men didn't get the vote until 1918 either

>>138109087
>shit talking trump

what an interesting show

>>138109339
Novel, isn't it?

>>138109002
It's a sensitive issue.

>>138109321
And the price they had to pay was much higher, fucking cuntish women

>>138109482
Nah seriously what happened froggy, i stopped going on britpol for a while and he's gone

>>138109321
This makes me so angry

Votes for women was tacked on the back of all the soldiers dying in their droves

>>138109545
SHE DIED!

>>138109012
History in British schools is terrible. Gove tried to fix it but thanks to the teachers fighting him over EVERYTHING he did he couldn't.

They do stupid shit like teaching Roman Britain in primary school when classical history is probably too far removed and complicated for the kids of today to understand, especially with state school teaching standards.

File: 1493399157866.png (15KB, 240x304px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 240x304px

>>138107129

>>138109677
THEY WORKED IN THE FACTORIES! SOME OF THEM GOT BROKEN NAILS! HOW COULD YOU!

>>138108669
I have the same issue. Especially on here with subjects like law and the god awful constitution discussion. It's extremely clear why national pride is non-existent.

>>138108972
No he didn't? Jews were still banned in England during Henry's reign to my knowledge, as they weren't permitted back in until the end of the 17th century, which is over 100 years after Henry died.

>>138109226
90% sure Hawking's been a vegetable for over a decade and now it's just someone with Microsoft Sam using him as a mouthpiece because his living corpse has residual status.

File: sad possum.jpg (15KB, 262x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 262x300px

>>138109677
I think we are in rat's alley
Where the dead men lost their bones

>>138109678
B..BUT THE KINGS HORSE, FORCE FEEDING, MIDDLE CLASS WOMEN HAVING TO GO TO PRISON FOR BREAKING THE LAW.


They like to gloss over the bomb making.

File: 1498239977650.jpg (74KB, 800x792px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 800x792px

>>138109321
>Watch your best friend asphyxiate in the trenches
>come home on leave
>a suffragette hands you a white feather, thinking you're a conscientious objector.

File: rimmer getting rimmed.gif (994KB, 500x271px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 500x271px

>>138109751
>suspicious

>>138109747
Migration is now on the curriculum

Guess whether it is portrayed in a positive or negative light

>He was a fat cunt who broke ties with a Church deeply embedded into England because he was horny
How is that not the truth, even if it is a crude way of putting it?

>>138109321
What the fuck really

>>138109747
Was gove actually bad i remember my teachers always used to shit talk him but i don't know about him. Our school system needs a complete renovation but i imagine it would end up worse because someone stupid and incompetent would end up being put in charge of it

File: 1502037568878.jpg (309KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 675x900px

>>138109665

>>138110025
>What the fuck really
For working class men (most of us I imagine) yes.
Try and guess why they don't teach you it.

File: nicky4.jpg (123KB, 760x400px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 760x400px

Who else /comfy/ Pitter patter of rain is bloody lovely

>>138110114
>YKTD
>Smiling
dumb frogposter

>>138110013
Meant for >>138108357

File: oh dear oh dear.jpg (88KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1920x1080px

>>138109950

hold me Rimmer

>>138106753
Corbyn. He's got that gutter-born low cunning to him that nancy boy Clegg just can't match.

>>138110165
It was done to try and prevent a communist revolution in Britain.

>>138110025
Gove did what the Teaching Unions hate, try to make teachers accountable and raise standards. The man isn't perfect but he was the best of the Cameroons. He also advocated for more British history in schools. Something we desperately need to try and increase national pride.

File: britpriv.png (76KB, 306x217px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 306x217px

>Stephen Hawking blames Tory politicians for damaging NHS
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/aug/18/stephen-hawking-blames-tory-politicians-for-damaging-nhs

>Setting out his fears for a service he believes is being turned into “a US-style insurance system”.

>“The crisis in the NHS has been caused by political decisions,”

>“The political decisions include underfunding and cuts, privatising services, the public sector pay cap, the new contract imposed on the junior doctors and removal of the student nurses’ bursary.

I don't think we need Stephen Hawking to tell us this. Glad he's speaking out though. Someone needs to.

>>138109845

The NHS is precious. If it goes we will be the poorer, and not just financially. We must fight to protect it and the people who make it work, the loss of the NHS will be a huge blow to our nation.

>>138106753
Nick Clegg would slap Corbyn right round the face with his giant schlong before placing a vial underneath Corbyn's eye to add Corbyn's tears to his collection.

>>138109012
>the blitz

Fuck me the blitz was so cringe at school. I lived in an area with major military contributions to the war and didn't know until years after I left school.

>Learn about how women drew lines on their legs to make it look like they had tights on
>Literally nothing to do with the war in any way shape or form
>The yanks sent us powdered eggs

Didn't they also send us hmm, I don't know, tens of thousands of soldiers? What happened with all of that?

File: pubes and his 'car'.gif (1MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x180px

>>138110280

>>138110359
Archive or screenshot please
https://unvis.it/theguardian.com/science/2017/aug/18/stephen-hawking-blames-tory-politicians-for-damaging-nhs

>>138109838
He personally ordered a copy of the Talmud and consulted rabbis on the divorce. Had they been more flexible with him, he would have converted.

File: 1501979185071.png (99KB, 746x512px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 746x512px

>>138110286

>>138110025
>teachers always used to shit talk him
That's a good indication he was getting something right. The problem is, improving the state of education requires accepting that stupid people won't do well. This is how it ought to be but few want to accept it so intelligent kids will continue to be dragged down by duds.

>>138110013
WN has a post that goes in-depth >>138108669

It isn't a "crude" way of putting it, it's an oversimplification of real and extremely important events in history. The divorce thing is primary school tier teaching to get kids interested, there were deep religious divides in England its self, across the continent and to say nothing of the Pope.

Thinking the entire fracture and formation of one Church for another which would continue for the next 500 years and still on-going stems from a horny fat man wanting a divorce is not only stupid, but quite dangerous to real history.

File: hearty guffaw.jpg (53KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1024x576px

>>138110377

File: 1322796219001.png (65KB, 500x382px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 500x382px

>>138110442

>>138110415
Norwaybro? Is that you?

>>138110359
Shame with privatising the NHS is even if they do we will still pay exactly the amount in taxes we do now to keep subhumans and their 12 children alive

>>138109321
Hitchens has a good theory in Abolition of Liberty/Brief History of Crime. He thinks that it was down to all the middle class suffragettes going to the hellholes that were Edwardian prisons that prompted all the terrible prison reforms that have slowly caused the country to descend into lawlessness.

>this guys point
MORE KILLING! BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!

Eww that was a bit horrible.

>>138110656
Must be in the latter. Haven't read that one. Will have to now.

>>138110439
He couldn't have converted to Judaism, or successfully convert England to Judaism even if that had of been his desire, which it absolutely, 110% WASN'T. The Protestant v Catholic divide was already massive in England, and Jews weren't permitted any of the rights a free English citizen was. Even 100 years after Henry, Jews were excluded from the Bill of Rights 1689. I think implying England would ever be a Jewish country (inb4 it is now) under Henry VIII's reign is ridiculous

File: 1501835617055.png (283KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 600x338px

This seems an odd position to take. Surely the very act of Scottish Independence is nationalist.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-scotland-sturgeon-idUKKCN1AY1TA

>>138110838
>>138110656
Ignore that first part. Got mixed up with Abolition of Britain an didn't realise its them two were same book but updated. Silly me.

>>138110757
This fucking guy, jesus christ. We're doomed. Listen to how excited he is.

>>138111011
She really just needs to kill herself

>>138110534
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/137267531/#137271827

Why is Steve advocating for violence against people voicing their opinions? Fuck this cunt, wish his grandad was blown up in the factory.

File: _94224674_health_spending_growth.jpg (23KB, 624x417px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 624x417px

>>138110359
ARE EN HAITCH ESSSSSSSSSSS

>5th biggest employer on the planet (and by far the biggest in the UK)
>By far the biggest healthcare system on the planet (UK is the 21st biggest country)
>Less efficient and effective than the healthcare of Mexico
Pic related, the "savage cuts" that lefties threw a hysterical fit over.

File: STIRGEON MUG.jpg (19KB, 395x405px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 395x405px

>>138111304

File: jenkins_2850786b[1].jpg (65KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 620x387px

>>138111072
Abolition of Liberty is nowhere near as depressing as Abolition of Britain, it's a nice summery of the downfall of British policing though. And of course Peters favorite Home Secretary features prominently.

>where are people getting all these flags
>in the age of internet shopping
I dunno. Weird.

>>138110443
i fucking hated that at school people holding back the whole maths class because they have no fucking idea whats going on

File: UK (110).jpg (169KB, 1200x595px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1200x595px

>>138111011
>Surely the very act of Scottish Independence is nationalist.
Technically. Nationalism is pride in nation, it can include independence, but why can't Scots be proud of Scotland, Britain and the UK? The history is a bit touchy, but the last few centuries were the pinnacle of a unified nation (bar the angry Scottish Highlanders).

Then again, I see why Scots wouldn't want to be part of modern England but in my LARP world, we are a unified nation who take pride in our nations but also our kingdom.

We are all one people after all.

Got banned from /int/ so I guess I'll come here. How are you keeping lads

File: very witty.jpg (69KB, 541x607px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 541x607px

>>138111613

>>138111828
Reset your modem nonce. You aren't welcome here.

File: IMG_2151.jpg (78KB, 800x684px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x684px

>>138111768
Fuck Scotland

>>138111828
Pretty comfy here. What did you do, lad?

>>138111828
Alrite, yourself?

>>138106824
who do you keep spamming this subhuman pro-miscegenation kike?

File: 1500815141794.gif (212KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 501x585px

>trump is a dictator for calling out fake news

File: 1502323184314.jpg (56KB, 480x422px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 480x422px

>>138111453
never hear anything about the millions of foreigners who fuck up the public services just by being here and using them

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/she-killed-husband-nan-whose-11012141

guilty people dont commit suicide

>>138111930
Come on lad. I know their politics manages to be more autistic than ours somehow, but we are all one people.

>>138111718
I remember every other class there was a wheelchair bound elbow licker disrupting the first quarter hour of the lesson before they took them out. Why? What are they getting out of it? It does nothing but disrupt the rest of the class and the only reason for doing it is to feel good about ourselves.

Make money and send your kids to private school, if you can even find one at that point and they haven't been shut down for being mean.

>>138111930
Scotland is more successful than England. England is constantly going into debt and recessions. While Scotland creates a profit. You're a thick fuck, it was Scotland who basically started the idea of the union when the King of Scotland became the king of England. Scotland had its own little nations spread across the world but needed more trade routes so relied off English trade. Scottish people fought against England making sure Scotland wouldn't be a slave state, William Wallace and Robert Burns made sure of that. Instead of Scotland being slaves like the Welsh and Irish we became equal partners, which is why we have a separate parliament that has the power to call a referendum whenever it gets enough petitions. England is scared to lose us. Why would David Cameron and countless of English politicians and public beg to keep Scotland in the union? If it wasn't for the scare mongering Scotland would be independent and far better off, following the Norwegian/Danish example of economy. There's no way we'll be paying with our oil to keep England becoming bankrupt. Nothern England probably will come with us, petitions in Nothern England were happening in the last referendum to make the north part of Scotland. England is a pathetic country run by immigrants, jews, perverts for immigrants, jews and perverts. some English people don't deserve to live in England because they're decent but cunts like you should stay there and rot in your own anti-nativist pot.

>>138111933
made an off-topic OP edition of /brit/, janny didn't like it. Bit harsh imo but I kind of need an excuse to get off /int/ anyway.

File: I believe in the death penalty.jpg (43KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x360px

>>138111980
>every fucking time

>>138112153
I filter you in these threads lad, but I'll give you credit, you have decent bait.

>>138112153
>scotcuck delusion

You have the most debt in Europe P/P and are dragging down superior Anglos

>>138107644
he was a great king, till his horse landed on top of him while Jousting. He suffered a head injury, and was never the same after that.

File: laughter.gif (2MB, 390x277px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x277px

>>138112153
>tfw you believe the SNP

>>138111768
I didn't say Independence = Nationalism, so I don't see how "technically" comes into it. I said the act of declaring independence is nationalist.

Redpill me on Generation Identity. I think they've just sprung up a British chapter of it, and I hope it's as successful as the French and Austrian chapters. Would be one of the only things keeping me from getting blackpilled about the state of this country.

>>138112081
Nicky is a bit autistic.

>>138112207
Well it's a good thing we've got colony threads on half the boards then. You're welcome to stay as long as you want, mate.

File: baldrick.jpg (38KB, 532x355px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 532x355px

>>138112414
Thought it was his leg that got injured?

File: IMG_0106.jpg (26KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 350x350px

>>138112153
>Scottish bait

>>138112494
>I think they've just sprung up a British chapter of it
link

>>138112485
scots and their sympathizers need to be purged and turned into Tesco Value meat

>>138111472
S T I R
T
I
R

>>138112277
"Anglo" isn't a genetic term. GB is Celto-Germanic. Funnily enough, the percentage of Celtic and Germanic increases more from West-to-East as opposed to North to South.

So the English, the Welsh and the Scots are all the same peoples.

File: GI UK and Ireland.jpg (104KB, 960x355px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 960x355px

>>138112541
fb.com/IdentitarianMovement/

saw this, not sure if it's the official page or not but I've definitely heard they've started recruiting in British universities. They're going for the nationalist but educated/middle class student demographic that worked out well in Europe.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/fans-travelling-accies-match-hunted-10998890

i hope they dont catch them

File: 7.jpg (35KB, 434x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 434x600px

>>138112145
i remember the was one of them at my school and they strapped a pen to his fucking forehead so he could try to write, he just sat there dribbling and spazzing out

>>138112494
Would unironically join.

They call it the "hipster right", and I'd love to meet some more young rightwingers.

>>138113000
i'll look into it

>>138113278
Yeah same. From the videos it seems it definitely seems like my kind of crowd. Bit nerdy but very right-wing, and encouraging self-improvement, self-defense, reading, community and event organising. Sounds a lot more fun than joining up with the EDL or Britain First or National Action (F)

Pretty sure this lad on the LBC mixed up White people with Jews.

Statistically speaking, how many terrorist attacks will occur in London over the next couple of years and how many will die?

>>138113823
Was he /our/ guy?

>>138112494
They accept mudbloods. They have literal Berber/Jew mixed mongrels in French chapter and Medlets/Jew mixed in German and Austrian ones

>>138108103
PPE
She will be the PM.

File: 1496417623637.jpg (93KB, 700x961px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 700x961px

>>138113236
My best mate got a lower GCSE maths grade than the mong that was in his class. He ended up never passing.

>>138106521
yo dude, if you're gonna keep this king posting up, why not put some info about the kings. not just wikipedia shit too

>>138113278
I'm a bit old for it now I think but I'd probably get in touch regardless if they pop up near me.

File: james.jpg (18KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 350x350px

>>138114007
Nothing really there to prevent car and truck attacks. They're Londoners though, most of them probably posted #RefugeesWelcome on social media.

File: mao.jpg (455KB, 689x912px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 689x912px

Did nothing wrong

>>138112524
Yes it was.

File: blackpill.jpg (407KB, 1500x1093px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1500x1093px

>>138113234
>"Hunting down" people who sing songs and hurt lefty feelings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNGRpKwIAwE#t=15m45s
One of these men ended up participating in the Borough Market attack.

>>138114033
If he'd said Jews yeah.

>>138114494
The police are a joke.

File: Lay All Your Legs On Me.jpg (104KB, 634x590px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 634x590px

Late night ABBA lads. Post underappreciated top tier tunes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ90ZqH0PWI

>>138114007

I think it'll be more interesting to know if there will be an increase in mass rioting there or if it's just going to be a slow decline. I think it'll be a slow decline into more violence and crime with more buildings burning down. It'll end up like Detroit or the way Chicago is going.

How socialistic are you lads?

I'm really only in favour of the NHS and nationalised railways. Would prefer most things run privately tbqh

>>138113823
I couldn't take anymore after that guy excitedly fantasizing about killing evil nazis.

File: cleaners.jpg (228KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1200x1200px

>>138114833
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISB9xD4ggd0

>human race being poisoned by food companies

File: black guy.jpg (58KB, 700x1045px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x1045px

>>138113268
Pretty good bait thread going on at the minute, a lot of triggered amerifats.

>>138114935
This.

>>138114833
brit/pol/ tripcunt theme

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0b-nFSUXcuM

>>138114586
It made me wonder as it was like he was suggesting that white people are to be overthrown in the US which might have been a doggo whistle to white people like: hang on a minute, the left is trying to get rid of me.

File: quadratum regem.jpg (781KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

781KB, 800x1000px

>>138107427
>>138107644
>square king best king

>>138114446
I didn't desu

>>138114858
If it's not happened yet, what will it take? Had young children deliberately targeted in a bomb attack and the biggest retaliation was some EDL lad smashing a few windows on a mosque or something like that. We're far too subdued for any political action now in the west, and of course that's part of the problem

>>138114935
After working in the NHS for a year I can tell you it needs put down

They have deliberately not trained white British people so they can employ more foreigners

The management are traitorous feather nesting retards pissing money away on third world medicine

What happened to Swansea?

>>138115158
No the left are just genuinely excited about handing over to the people who created such great nations as Liberia and Mexico.

>>138115294
Why don't we just purge the quangos rather than shut the whole thing down?

>>138115231
Actually he was meant to have been in excellent physical condition for most of his life, enjoying many outdoor activities such as hunting, tennis, jousting and so on

He was the putin of his day

>>138114935
Healthcare, railways, and businesses that are essential for the country to function properly.

>>138114942
I took a break for a bit after that as well.

>>138115016
why do you have that saved on your computer queer cuck

File: robbie.jpg (6KB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 300x188px

>>138115133
>>138114833
>tfw Feel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iy4mXZN1Zzk

I miss Robbie.

>>138115447
It's been destroyed by socialism, the amount of lefty cronyism that runs through each health authority is staggering.

File: Jim Steinman.png (546KB, 500x607px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 500x607px

>>138114993
>>138115133
>>138115610
Thanks for contributing lads, here's another
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qqhc9Id-Os

>>138115415
Me looking too hard for inadvertent red pills.

>>138113571
sounds gay af and a gateway to getting on a naughty list

>generation identity
if we say it enough times we'll establish an identity

identity politics
NOT ON MY LAWN

>>138115294
Don't know why more people don't realise this desu. My sister wants to be a physiotherapist - she was predicted A*A*A*A (ended up getting A*AAA), but got rejected by 4 out of her 5 choices, even by complete meme unis like Bradford (which is a blessing in disguise I suppose). All the cleverest people I knew at college wanted to be doctors, but quite a few who got all A*s and As were rejected by all choices first time, and had to re-take more exams and do more extra-curriculars, etc. NHS just has no interest in training its own staff anymore, much easier for them to just employ some jf who doesn't speak a word of the queen's.

>>138115525
>After dinner, we were taken to the King [Henry VIII], who embraced us, without ceremony, and conversed for a very long while very familiarly, on various s, in good Latin and in French, which he speaks very well indeed, and he then dismissed us, and we were brought back here to London….
His Majesty is the handsomest potentate I ever set eyes on; above the usual height, with an extremely fine calf to his leg, his complexion very fair and bright, with auburn hair combed straight and short, in the French fashion, his throat being rather long and thick. He was born on the 28th of June, 1491, so he will enter his twenty-fifth year the month after next. He speaks French, English, and Latin, and a little Italian, plays well on the lute and harpsichord, sings from book at sight, draws the bow with greater strength than any man in England, and jousts marvelously. Believe me, he is in every respect a most accomplished Prince; and I, who have now seen all the sovereigns in Christendom, and last of all these two of France and England in such great state, might well rest content.

Description of him by a faggot Italian diplomat

>>138115870
what about white identity? British identity?

>>138115966
Saul Alinsky. It's no coincidence. It was a targetted and coordinated effort.

>>138113236
I had one all the way from primary school. Proper drooling spacker, lights on but no one home. It wasn't so bad in primary school because that's basically playgroup with some maths and english tacked on, but in secondry it was just fucking cruel. Only there because the parents insisted that she go to a normal school rather than something that might have actually helped her live a better life.

>>138115966
Purge the socialists when

>>138115966
The 60s/70s/80s kids grew up and got jobs, but never forgot their origins.

File: british army.jpg (82KB, 497x530px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 497x530px

>>138115966
and I really mean it when I say every single public institution lads...

>>138115870
What's wrong with identity politics?

>>138115966
>implying the british monarchy doesn't control the globalist agenda the left pushes as footsoldiers

your own royals are fucking you over and they have been for centuries

File: armypride.jpg (63KB, 496x453px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 496x453px

>>138116501

File: smudger.jpg (145KB, 517x926px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 517x926px

>>138116666

>>138116053
To be fair, that is probably in part because white British people who we do train tend to fuck off at the first opportunity.

>>138116625
Our own royals couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery. Charles was cucked by a slimy paki crackhead.

File: argiecucks2.png (33KB, 1006x426px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1006x426px

>>138116625
still salty?

>>138115525
Such praise! You can keep your head.

>>138116545
The basic theory is that ideology is objective universal true, while the living person is subjective.

It it's not total bullshit, but it's far too simplistic and ignores certain rather important things. Like our world.

>>138116192
define either

>>138115610
>I miss Robbie.
is he dead?

>>138116545
if you're white, everything

if you're muslim/black ect its great

File: NatCon.jpg (25KB, 604x210px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 604x210px

>>138116625
You know fuck all about Britain you 3rd world rat. The Monarchy in Britain hasn't held any true executive power since 1850, and had a slow decline since 1688 into irrelevance. Many people, myself included, would welcome the full return of the Monarch to their constitutional duties that was referred to by 18th-19th century writers as a "balanced constitution" in which parliament controlled the legislative branch, with the Crown controlling the executive branch, both serving as checks on each others power.

The Royals are irrelevant and many want them to return. You know nothing of Britain or are monarchical system.

>>138116818
Yeah Di was a slut, but I dunno. I rather like Charles. He tries to do better and cares about his role and people, when he could have just been another celeb.

I do agree with Nicky on this one. The fatty problem would probably be solved if people didn't snack on crisps between every meal and ate more apples.

>>138110371
Our history and art teacher at primary made us draw oil paintings of holocaust mass graves.

I remember he told us not to forget that many of the victims were naked, and not to hide the "true horrors".

I think the guy was a bit dodgy come to think of it.

>>138116728
I all fairness Nelson and Wellington did look fabulous in all their officer gear.

>>138116798
Is that true? Brits don't tend to move abroad that often as far as I can tell

>>138117012
So it's just autists who choose to ignore reality? Got it.

>>138117059
We are shaped by our identity and by our groups. The British people are a distinct group with distinct values, interests, goals, characteristics. These may only appear subconsciously but they're definitely there.

this vague definition can be used for every group though

>>138117160
Yeah, he's a fine bloke. But he's not exactly an omnipotent supervillain either. My point is that he couldn't even keep some gutter-whore away from a crackhead, and that hardly shows undying power and authority.

File: charles.jpg (158KB, 635x900px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 635x900px

>"For the past 15 years I have been entirely motivated by a desperate desire to put the “Great” back into Great Britain. Everything I have tried to do—all the projects, speeches, schemes, etc.—have been with this end in mind. And none of it has worked, as you can see too obviously! In order to put the “Great” back I have always felt it was vital to bring people together, and I began to realise that the one advantage my position has over anyone else’s is that I can act as a catalyst to help produce a better and more balanced response to various problems. I have no “political” agenda—only a desire to see people achieve their potential; to be decently housed in a decent, civilised environment that respects the cultural and vernacular character of the nation; to see this country’s real talents (especially inventiveness and engineering skills) put to best use in the best interests of the country and the world (at present they are being disgracefully wasted through lack of co-ordination and strategic thinking); to retain and value the infrastructure and cultural integrity of rural communities (where they still exist) because of the vital role they play in the very framework of the nation and the care and management of the countryside; to value and nurture the highest standards of military integrity and professionalism, as displayed by our armed forces, because of the role they play as an insurance scheme in case of disaster; and to value and retain our uniquely special broadcasting standards which are renowned throughout the world. The final point is that I want to roll back some of the more ludicrous frontiers of the 60s in terms of education, architecture, art, music, and literature, not to mention agriculture! Having read this through, no wonder they want to destroy me, or get rid of me…!"

-The Prince of Wales, in a 1993 letter to Tom Shebbeare, then director of the Prince's Trust

>>138117299
It's self-evidently true that people from different cultures act differently. This shouldn't really need any explanation, and indeed is near impossible to articulate; much like attempting to explain what the colour green looks like.

>>138117299
Exactly lad. At the present time, it seems to be "white" nationalism prevailing, which is a good thing all in all but it's an American term. Europeans should also defend our individual ethnicity whilst still being apart of the same race.

>>138117260
Something like 5000 a year I've read.

>>138117539
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoJVn0Eq8y0

Also agree with Nicky on the tests for reproduction. Good lad on that subject he is.

>>138117270
Again, too simplistic. They have a point in that, for example, blacks are not retards for being born that way 100% of the time. There is some leeway and outliers, and it rarely pays to assume on an individual level.

>>138117539
Yeah good luck saying anything remotely like that in public

>>138117539
Charles says a lot of silly things but he isn't as bad as people make him out to be. If it wasn't for Diana being such a media whore (literally) he'd be liked a lot more. He is fighting the good fight with modern architecture too.

>>138117676
Should be banned for having cross eyes and being a fatso.

>>138117641
Is this actually good or is it a general BBC leftist shitshow

>>138117641
Is that even allowed? I thought Monarchs weren't allowed to cross the threshold.

>>138117895
It's awful and it is propaganda. Kate is a schemer, William is a cuckold and Harry falls in love with a nigress but that scene is great.

>>138106521
If heard of Alfred the Cake, you are a Bad Thing and should not post in this thread.

>>138117933
He broke precedent! Why isn't the sky falling Eddie?

>>138117933
it's
a
spook

>>138117384
>and that hardly shows undying power and authority.

No one, even he himself, thinks he has that. However, given what he's got, he does very well.

An interesting little interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_jvC39sxow

>>138117933
It's technically allowed through Pregorative powers. Monarchical powers are an extremely complex subject. Precedent dictates they do not interfere with the legislative branch, however it is technically legal and has been for 800 years since parliament first convened.

https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/422/42204.htm

> The Queen's constitutional prerogatives are the personal discretionary powers which remain in the Sovereign's hands. They include the rights to advise, encourage and warn Ministers in private; to appoint the Prime Minister and other Ministers; to assent to legislation; to prorogue or to dissolve Parliament; and (in grave constitutional crisis) to act contrary to or without Ministerial advice. In ordinary circumstances The Queen, as a constitutional monarch, accepts Ministerial advice about the use of these powers if it is available, whether she personally agrees with that advice or not. That constitutional position ensures that Ministers take responsibility for the use of the powers.

>>138118052
>still not understanding precedent

>>138112153
>Robert Burns

Decent bait, nice effort

>>138117682
Accounting for individual differences doesn't preclude basing politics on wider identities. Trying to account for individual differences on a national scale, anything above very small communities, is a crippling task. Generalisation is a net positive.

>>138118034
"If you have never heard of" Don't know what happened there...

>>138118118
Thank you.

>>138106521
Articulate free speech advocate just got shut down on lbc

>Nick Abott: there is no moral equivalency between the people protesting the charlottesville march and "nazis".

File: HRH.jpg (47KB, 564x423px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 564x423px

>>138117539
>to retain and value the infrastructure and cultural integrity of rural communities (where they still exist) because of the vital role they play in the very framework of the nation and the care and management of the countryside;

fuck that

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/give-us-your-duchy-demand-for-charles-728m-cornish-estate-8190493.html
https://archive.is/000me [sick archive url]

the royalty fuck us all over as regards to land
>steal all the land
>eke it out for max profit
ta m8

File: redcoat.png (272KB, 600x840px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 600x840px

>>138118298
My pleasure lad. Monarchy is my favourite subject.

>>138118118
Precedent just seems like unwritten imaginary rules the Monarch follows tbwh

>>138117568
Of course. The British character must be preserved and maintained, it wouldn't be in our interests to be a vaguely 'white race' the same way America has become, or is becoming. Same should apply for every other nationalist movement in Europe. National identity first, European identity second, and then other identities after that.

Personally, when it comes to other Europeans, especially western Europeans, assimilation should be encouraged when they immigrate to this country. But I'm rather biased in this regard since it's the definition my grandparents fall under- Germans who came here, but their children and grandchildren have assimilated and become British (in culture).

>>138118348
Been happening all night. He let a giggling nut go on for ages about how much he wanted to kill all nazis in a not so subtle way that still doesn't technically break any rules.

>>138118469
You're a German lad.

>>138118082
No question about it, I agree with you. I was addressing the Argie's nonsense about the Royals being some sort of all-powerful supervillain league.

Have a look at Lyndon LaRouche. He's an American conspiracy nut who blames all of the world's problems on the British monarchy. I assume that's where the Argie got his information from.

>>138118392
Republicans get out

What's the average age of someone on /pol/ or 4chan these days? I get the feeling that it used to be strictly for 16-21 year olds and you'd be a bit of a weird sad cunt if you were still on it after that, but somehow it morphed into something that it's still alright to be on when you're 40, and we probably have people aged 18-50 regularly contributing to every thread, although most will be in 20s.

OP title is triggering me.

Saxon word for 'King' Is 'Konige.'
Shouldn't be Rex.

>>138118610
I know. But let me LARP as a good man of England, it's what I've been doing my whole life.

>>138118235
>Accounting for individual differences doesn't preclude basing politics on wider identities
True, however my point was that there is an element of writing off others wholesale inherent in it, if you let that get carried away.

>>138118447
I can't tell whether you're the guy who posts bait or not but on the off chance you're serious, let me take this short paragraph and explain the importance of precedent. First of all, it is followed by all government officials, every elected MP, every PM, everyone in the legislative & executive branch. It's not imaginary, seeing as a lot is based on written law of the past.

>>138118610
Every group that's ever came to the British isles, bar the Romans who left NO genetic heritage, has been part of the same people from the Beaker-Cordedware. So the Belgians, the Jutes, the Vikings, the Angles, the Celts, the Saxons and the Normans were all genetically similar, like all North-Western Europeans.

We're all part """German""" mate but Germanic is not the same as modern Germany as a nationality. We are Celto-Germanic, depending on where you are in the country, you could be 10%-60% Anglo Saxon, or 10%-60% Celtic.

>>138118605
It doesn't surprise me desu Saved Nick from getting btfo'd potentially, although I doubt he would have let him speak long enough to anyway.

>>138112145
>>138113236


There was a downy girl at my school and she got so much virtue signalling attention from all the girls that it went to her head. She eventually started kicking random people and spitting at them, the retarded women teachers would just run after her going 'oooh no, don't do that, oooh.' without actually punishing her or doing anything about it. She was a disgusting little spacker cunt and she shouldn't have been in our school.

>>138118469
Exactly lad. My feelings exactly. America has genuine reason to promote white nationalism (so do we in fact) but that's because, and not as an insult, they're a nation of literal mongrels. Ethnicities and cultures that have evolved and spread for 2000 to 6000 years need to be protected by the people of that culture.

>>138118946
And what's the punishment if somebody breaks precedent?

>>138118789
Pretty accurate. Sometimes we get a couple of underaged, but not as often as we used to.

>>138119319
Audible tutting.

>>138118789
Over 40 Anon here - not many places to go on the interweb to speak freely desu.

I have a feeling that the 2021 census is going to absolutely shock the country when it comes out. I mean most nationalists were shocked by it in 2011, but I think it's really going to start affecting the normies when they see how far we're gone by 2021.

>>138119593
How many white children do you have?

>>138119319
A constitutional crisis, an impeachment of a Prime Minister, the expulsion of an MP, the abdication of a Monarch. Look at Edward VIII, or the crisis the Referendum bill caused, or the process of Brexit - which I support fully, but Referendums are not apart of our system, which has caused a constitutional crisis in its self and given MPs opposed to Brexit a shot.

>n legal systems based on common law, a precedent, or authority, is a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts[citation needed]. Common law legal systems place great value on deciding cases according to consistent principled rules so that similar facts will yield similar and predictable outcomes, and observance of precedent is the mechanism by which that goal is attained. The principle by which judges are bound to precedents is known as stare decisis.

From the first paragraph of fucking wikipedia. You could've found it yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent

>>138119624
It will be hailed as a triumph for "diverse, modern Britain"; because, after all, diversity and tolerance are a virtue for some unexplained reason.

>>138111768
That's mostly my view as both a Scottish and British nationalist.

>>138119674
Just one white child lad and an ex wife.

>>138119757
I wonder how long that facade can last. I might be too optimistic that people are waking up, or maybe I just can't believe that the media STILL has the wool over the public's eyes

>>138119696
Edward VIII chose to abdicate, he could've ignored prevent and married anyway.

So it's essentially just agreed upon that "you don't break precedent"? It's not written down, everyone just agrees?

File: farewell to...love.....jpg (227KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 640x480px

>>138119593

>>138119757
Maybe in the media, but normies might just wake up. It's important to hammer home the point that we'll have gone from 99.9% white to minority white in UNDER A CENTURY. That amounts to ethnic cleansing.

We know what's happening and we have a 4 year jump, so we should start preparing our memes and our talking points now.

>>138119624
What are your predictions? Surely we're at something like 30% white British in London and 80% white British for the country by now?

>>138107007
I liked the videos he did of some of Kipling's poetry. They were very effective. If anyone knows anywhere else he's uploaded them, it'd be great to know.

File: british school children.jpg (38KB, 468x286px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 468x286px

>>138120396
I feel like the major towns will be a real shocker.
The under 18s in several towns and cities are already minority white, based on the school censuses.

The School Census for under 18s

In 1998, no town in Britain was a town where the white children were a minority. Every major town in Britain had a majority of White British children.
This changed in 1999.
In 1999, Slough became the first town where the White British under 18s became a minority, under 50%.
In 2000, Nelson followed.
In 2001, Batley and Greater London also became minority white in the under-18s.
In 2002, Leicester.
In 2003, no new towns became minority white for under 18s.
In 2004, Birmingham.
In 2005, Luton.
In 2006, no new towns. The last year no new towns became minority white for under 18s.
In 2007, Keighley.
In 2008, Burton on Trent.
In 2009, High Wycombe.
In 2010, Bradford.
In 2011, Manchester.
In 2012, Dewsbury.
In 2013, Huddersfield.
In 2014, Halifax.
In 2015, Sandwell, Blackburn, Reading and Watford.
In 2016, Nottingham, Wolverhampton and Oxford.
In 2017, Bedford and Coventry.

>>138120452
Rudyard Kipling was Gandhi's favourite poet:

File: webster was much possessed by death.jpg (54KB, 1096x740px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1096x740px

>>138119624
>I think it's really going to start affecting the normies
Don't bother hoping. Dead is dead.

>But no longer at ease here in the old dispensation,
>With an alien people clutching their gods.
>I should be glad of another death.

>>138120396
>80% white British for the country by now?
Wouldn't surprise me if we dipped under it honestly.

File: 231.png (107KB, 472x474px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 472x474px

>>138120105
>Edward VIII chose to abdicate, he could've ignored prevent and married anyway.
He didn't "choose" to abdicate, so much as the Prime Minister, Governor General of India and many heads of the legislative branch threatened to resign if the marriage went forward.

What you're doing now is trying to switch the argument away from precedent and responding with 2-sentence replies. You haven't the first clue of the British system of law. It isn't a case of "you don't break precedent", its a case of establishing precedent on issues and playing value on previous written law and court rulings, thus you remain consistent with time which defeats entrenchment by a mile.

In other words, "precedent", on a lot of cases, descends from plagues, civil wars, peasant revolts, revolution, foreign wars, conscription, attempted invasions to issues on dodging tax, the regulations of car manufacturing to rules of divorce in family courts.

>>138120244
It's been a good while lad - the pain numbs and fades, yet there is a walking likeness of us both in the world who will forge his way. He's pretty red pilled too.

>>138120626
Gandhi was a peculiar fellow.

>>138120105
>It's not written down, everyone just agrees?
Also it is written down. I post it every thread you idiot. >>138106639

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4by48e2cjy3ax4z/AADW5fTa8MP7lsuQJX1gUBHZa?dl=0

Here's an easy to navigate list of constitutional laws.

>>138120598
I read that in Newham it's now less than 5% of children who are white British, not sure if that's true or not. I live in Lambeth at the moment and work in Southwark, and quite often I see classes of children being led someplace or other by their teacher. I always make a note of counting how many white kids there are, and it's pretty much always about 20-30% (and even then I'd imagine there's a fairly high representation of eastern euros).

>>138120719
Doubt it makes a difference one way or tother lad, we're pretty much fucked

I'm a rural lad, so I see majority white faces pretty much every day. The only nonwhite I see is the kebab shop Turk.

I feel like I'm in another country when I go off to Manchester with the gf. I haven't even been to London in years but fucking Manchester looks like Islamabad.

File: white.png (19KB, 1163x130px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 1163x130px

>>138121146
Same here. Northumberland is still 99% white. I'm honoured. It won't be like this in 20 years though.

File: enough.jpg (41KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 615x409px

>>138121146
>with the gf
Don't.

>>138120791
Why not call their bluff and resign anyway? What's the worst that could happen if he did resign?

I don't see how precedent really applies to what the Monarch can and can't do, tbph. I get that if a court ruling has established that something is unlawful, then a similar case will be treated in the same way, and if a judgement is made in a higher court a lower court must follow it etc.

I don't see how it applies to what the Monarch can do or say if there hasn't been a similar case in the past though. For example, why could the Queen not state, "The Tories are shite"? Is there something either codified, or some previous case with applicable principles?

How does stare decisis apply when there hasn't been a prior ruling? (I.e. A party that isn't the largest party forming a government)

File: 1495754085550.jpg (56KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 720x720px

bloody moths REEEEE

File: 1500477490165.jpg (495KB, 1305x1265px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1305x1265px

Just woke up lads.

>>138121459
dumb frogposter

>>138121098
>work in Southwark
Me too mate
I'd buy you a pint but I don't want to get you doxxed. It's good to know there are others around though.

>>138121537
u ok bdy?

File: comrade.jpg (190KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1920x1080px

>>138121459
>>138121537
Red really is a rather frightening colour.

File: wojak moonlight.jpg (154KB, 945x1500px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 945x1500px

>tfw remembering i used to play L4D2 On Xbox with my mates all day.

Also nearly got sexually groomed by a paedphile over xbox live.

Downloaded it in steam but it just isnt the same nowadyas

>>138121393
Convention seems more appropriate

File: 1487685215477.jpg (60KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 700x500px

>>138121907
existence is pain

>>138121751
I don't know if it counts as Southwark proper - I'm right by Borough Market/London Bridge, and I've not really been to any other part of Southwark because I've got no reason to. I do wonder how many people in London secretly share brit/pol/ type views. I've got one mate here who says things like "Nah you wouldn't want to move there, it's a black area" or "Avoid there completely, full of Asians", but he's from my 99% white hometown so I don't know if it counts. Mostly the views I hear are from #RefugeesWelcome tier idiots, so I keep my views to myself.

>>138121537
Just in time for comfy late night hours lad

>>138122080
>nearly got sexually groomed by a paedphile over xbox live
Good to know Rightly isn't taking his exile too hard to heart.

>>138122080
Dragged my old consoles out and had a go at some old games I used to play. Nostalgia trip like crazy.

>>138122080
Wouldn't mind a comfy (closed, private) brit/pol/ Steam group. We'd need to find a way to ensure no one gets doxxed.
I'd love to play some Civ 5 with you lads though.

File: rare176.jpg (45KB, 566x417px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 566x417px

>>138122037
red is pretty
red is my favourite colour desu

>>138121654
Have you sorted yourself out yet? What hobby did you choose in the end?

File: christchan.jpg (75KB, 776x960px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 776x960px

how do I get into religion lads

I got too much into fedoraism as a teenager and its given me a rather condescending opinion of religious attitudes that I want to get rid of. I want to be a Christfag but I don't know how

was baptised as a Catholic as a baby but I don't know if that helps

>>138122593
go to church

>>138121393
>What's the worst that could happen if he did resign?
I don't think this is even worthy of a response. What would happen if the entire legislative body of the country resigned, including the ministers of the Crown (Govn. Generals) who are essentially the monarchs of Australia/Canada/NZ, etc. To give you an idea of the power of Govn. Generals, in 1975 the Govn. to Australia fired the PM in response to a government shutdown.

>I don't see how precedent really applies to what the Monarch can and can't do, tbph.
I know you don't. I'm trying to educate you n the topic so you do know. You're living in a fantasy world where 1688 didn't happen, and we're living in some absolute monarchy only more like a 20th century dictatorship. The reality of the Crown being irrelevant is right in front of you, I explain why, you deny it and claim precedent is irrelevant (the stupidest point ever to be made on Brit/pol)

>I get that if a court ruling has established that something is unlawful, then a similar case will be treated in the same way
That's not how it works, and that's not precedent. If two laws are conflicting with each other, the public assembly/court decide which law takes PRECEDENCE over the other.

>For example, why could the Queen not state, "The Tories are shite"? Is there something either codified, or some previous case with applicable principles?
100% DanTheMan. You're bringing up scenarios irrelevant to the point. The Queen could probably do that, but she won't, because tradition is that the Queen does not interfere with the legislative branch of government.

In my final point I'd like to quickly explain our system. We had what was refereed to as a 'balanced constitution' meaning that the legislative branch enacted the will of the people, while the executive branch operated through their constitutional roles defined under Royal Prerogative powers. (see: >>138118118).

>>138122377
Fuck me lad, Civ 5 is the shit. I was only just getting into when 6 Came out - unfortunately i just couldent get into CIV 6 as much as 5

>>138122645
and then I'll just start believing in it?

>>138122593
Talk to a priest, lad. They're always welcoming to new members.

>>138121393
>>138122699
Both theoretically maintained checks on each others power. However, the last refusal of Royal Assent by Queen Anne in 1706 (5 years after the Act of Settlement and 16 years after the Bill of Rights). This was met with outrage, though the refusal was entirely legal and defined thoroughly in law, so it went through, but with horror from the legislative branch and thus it was never refused again.

>How does stare decisis apply when there hasn't been a prior ruling
It doesn't. Stare decisis is Judaical precedent which is different to the tradition of the Crown to not interfere with parliamentary affairs.

>>138122593
Read this-
https://www.poetryarchive.org/poem/journey-magi

File: 1503071621663.jpg (141KB, 845x883px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 845x883px

>>138122593
> baptised as a Catholic
Disgusting

>>138107427
>King Athelstan the unready?

but he was shit

>>138122377
All I have to play on is my shitty laptop but that would be a hell of a time.

File: charles and camilla.jpg (96KB, 400x601px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 400x601px

>>138122383
I prefer blues. It feels older, deeper, wiser, more tranquil and spiritual.

File: Help helper 33.png (35KB, 868x751px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 868x751px

tfw going to be homeless in just over a month.

Better hope the council finds me a place in the next couple of weeks.

NEW

>>138122989
>>138122989

>>138122701
if you keep going

>>138122874
that's athelred

File: 1467309015136.jpg (396KB, 1111x1692px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1111x1692px

>>138109677

>>138122145
>I'm right by Borough Market/London Bridge
Stop, you're freaking me out. I work around the Newcomen Steet area.

The older cockney types are absolutely sound, I know that. There are quite a few C I V I C older West Indian blokes who are top guys too.

>>138122593
To get out of the fedora nonsense, read The Last Superstition by Feser.

First, you must intellectually seek to understand why people believe in God. Read Summa Theologiæ to start with, and prior to that an introduction to Aquinas by Feser to prepare you. Also read Augustine's Confessions, and then move on to Existence of God by Swinburne, and Warranted Christian Belief, and God, Freedom, and Evil, both by Plantinga.

These are quite heavy philosophy books, so set aside some time. If you don't have a basic understanding of metaphysics, epistemology, and phenomenology, and modal logic it's worth reading some introductory books on those subjects in order to get the most out of the books I've recommended .

>>138122699
The Wikipedia article says that's what precedent is. Still don't see how any prior cases apply to the Monarch.

Literally makes no sense to me; if there's no prior ruling, then where is the precedent!?

>>138122737
So in all these cases it seems like precedent isn't a legal thing at all; it's just an understanding that people will react negatively to something you do and seek to manoeuvre legally to punish whoever broke precedent in some way.

>>138123538
Some good recommendations there lad.

>>138123809
>Literally makes no sense to me; if there's no prior ruling, then where is the precedent!?
DanTheMan, you misunderstood this through the entire 12 hour argument but stare decisis is judicial precedent, the precedent the Monarch is binded to is both legal and tradition.

Go back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688. Don't bother responding to points about the colonisation of India or the BoE, this is strictly the monarch. Parliament overthrew a monarch and invited two new co-monarchs to rule in terms they had established themselves in the Bill of Rights 1689 - which in its self isn't so bad, its 12 years later when the Act of Settlement 1701 would come to be that forbade Royal influence in public assemblies. Then Queen Anne's refusal of Royal Assent, Victoria's refusal to even sign it in person, the Monarch reduced to a Mafia-like syndicate. Rich, celebrated, theoretically some of the most powerful people in the world but in practice they have to operate behind curtains because the Monarch is on the verge of dissolution as iti s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Settlement_1701

>"o person who has an office under the monarch, or receives a pension from the Crown, was to be a Member of Parliament. This provision was inserted to avoid unwelcome royal influence over the House of Commons"

>Literally makes no sense to me
This sums up your entire life.

>>138123985
Yes, not stare decisis, but partly tradition.

>>138123256
>Newcomen Steet
Wew, pretty close. Do you walk to work at all and, if so, do you go on Borough High Street? If so, then I probably walk past/alongside you every day.

Not met many older cockney types (do cockneys even exist in London these days?), wasn't sure what sort of views they'd hold. On one hand they're traditional white working-class, but on the other hand the chances are they've grown up with this """diversity""" and don't know any different.