Most freedom loving ideology?

>>138049858
ancap. but ancaps are still retards.

>>138049964
How are ancaps different to usual right wing libertarians? and how are they retarded?

>>138050206
by definition of freedom, ancap provides it most. but ancap is still retarded because it can't work.
they are different compared to libertarians because libertarians at least want the state for some basics, unlike ancaps,

File: IMG_4766.gif (29KB, 300x522px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x522px

>>138049858
retard. Pic related

>>138050674
>by definition of freedom, ancap provides it most. but ancap is still retarded because it can't work.

Not true. Freedom needs coercion to enforce property rights and contracts--for example, who's to say I can't steal your bike in ancapistan? Or prevent you from circulating your newspaper with intimidation?

Freedom requires a state to protect those freedoms, and libertarianism is the ideology built around the above propositions.

Anyway, just ask Hoppe, a realistic ancap situation would be extremely conservative and probably not very free.

>>138050674
ok, so ancaps are pro no government as opposed to pro small government. I can see some flaws there already.

>>138049858
>national-SOCIALISM on captalism side
shitiest compass ever

>>138051275
No need to call me a retard but thank you for the pic I guess

>>138051301
>so ancaps are pro no government as opposed to pro small government.
took you a while. You know ancap stands for "anarcho-capitalist", right?

>>138051492
actually it seems quite apt to call you a retard since you have to turn to 4chan for such a simple question when you could have browsed wiki for 10 minites.

>>138051982
and how would I have ended up on wiki asking my initial question, including all of its points? You condescending cunt.

>>138052413
you probably could have googled "most freedom ideology"

File: 20170305_170457.jpg (63KB, 507x527px)

63KB, 507x527px

Ancaps suck with zero actual logical refutations to the ideology b8/ thread #1737958635

Sage

File: lel.gif (993KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 200x200px

>>138052730
>trusting Google to give legit results on such a question

>>138053005
Did I imply that I was ancap? No.

>>138049858
Total anarchy.
Not ancap... Not ancom.. Just total anarchy.

Most freedom, no set guidelines, no rules, do whatever the fuck you want. Your only laws are the natural laws. And if you can break natural laws, then your freedom is endless.

>>138053426
but this is unlivable, so it may be the freest ideology, but no the freest political system possible.

what would that be?

>>138053426
It would never work though, vulnerable people would be drawn to groups for protection.

>>138049858
fascism is statism + centrist economics this chart is wrong and GAY

>>138054210
idc I didn't make it

>>138053912
You're essentially asking for a paradox.

Abandon political law, and you will still be ruled by society.
Abandon social rule, and you will still be ruled by polity.

When you free the markets, decrease the regulation, then you're back to square one, the eventual decline of freedom. Take alcohol for example; it grows, it becomes abused, and people want to get rid of the abuse, so they regulate/ban it, then everything is peaceful so they de-regulate/unban it, then it becomes a major shit storm again; it's essentially what happened during alcohol prohibition; the alcohol became cheaper and more readily available, and it was unstoppable at that point.

A trapped man will cherish gluttony, lust, greed, and all else, because he's not fortunate enough to have those things. But when you free him, he will pursue those things 10 fold, and it will destroy him.
The only justified freedom is the freedom for an already freed man, because he already lives already accustomed to freedom.