Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Are moderate feminists actually superior to any other kind of women and the only girlfriend material out there for the intellectually superior men?
Traditional women are very dull and plain, typical and there's nothing new to it usually, only stereotypes, they are too submissive and you can't have a conversation with them. Furthermore, they want the man to be strong and don't accept tending to his weaknesses and mental issues such as anxiety or depression, they perceive neither arguments nor feelings.
On the other hand, activist left wing/feminist women are too entitled and have a feeling of superiority, in the same time tending to the weaknesses of the man but with the cost of him getting belittled all the time and treated as the inferior person in the relationship.
A relationship has to be based on equality, and while traditional women look good on paper, when I have actually started to know women I have got to the conclusions that they are way too overrated and I should stick to egalitarian/ moderately feminist women who are not braindead. All the females I have fallen in love to have been moderate feminists, I can't stand the submissive "traditional" women.
>>
Yeah I agree I want a smart woman who respects herself but doesn't think she's superior for her gender.
>>
>>138032823
what about sexually depraved submissive sluts who are deathly loyal to you and will be your sexual slave but can also entertain you intellectually by talking about high brow concepts like truth and justice?
>>
>>138032919
The slavish mentality is for fools who have accepted their place. I don't want a sheep of a woman by my side, because once she has come to terms with her subservience she will surely be unable to come up with anything thoughtful.
Do people who support traditional and submissive women feel content with a slave by their side? Can that woman emotionally support them? Maybe I am impaired by my sensitive and weak personality in my judgment.
>>138033094
I am not talking about the sex life, but the life overall which involves the position in society and in the relationship/marriage. For the record, I wouldn't like a woman who is into fetishes and BDSM, this makes her less pure.
>>
I want a woman who actually behaves like a woman, not some self-hating cunt who desperately tries to be a man.
>>
>>138033623
A woman who behaves like a woman and has no problems with that is a woman who supports moderate feminism/equality. A woman doesn't treasure her womanliness when she thinks she has to be dumber and weaker than the man in a relationship from the start.
>>
File: YouCantChangeTheChannelNow.png (557KB, 600x399px) Image search:
[Google]
557KB, 600x399px
>>138032823
FEMINISM is bad, period.
It was a mistake to allow women to vote, It was a mistake to allow women to become politicians, and it was fucking mistake to grant them all the benefits that society fucking licks their feet.
Women having sex with underaged boys? no fucking problemo and maybe fucking 200 hours community (((work)))
But when a man gets busted for PEDOPHILIA then it's several years if not over a decade, which is what one would expect but women get off WAAAAAAAAAAAAY too fucking easy.
Today's society don't believe that women can be just as EVIL as a man can be if not even more so.
Fuck feminism, it has not only ruined the women of our time but also ruined western civilization as feminists in guv'ment has been more than cooperative with the jews and invite on in the dark hordes of the 3rd world.
Feminism has even managed to make some women today just outright fucking reject it as it's literally MAN. HATING. in our timeline.
All feminists deserves to be gangraped by the dark horde right until they fucking choke to death on some muzzy rat/nigger dick.
>>
>>138033786
Please define "moderate feminism".
>>
>>138032823
To some extent I do feel what you mean. Its more fun to talk to a woman who actually has some intelligence and can talk about how society is doing, and such women usually tend to be a bit feminist.
Anyhow, in the current stage love should not be the goal; rather it should be reproduction
>>
>>138033791
I think like you when it comes to an outlook on the wider society. Women are indeed malevolent and more powerful within an egalitarian society, but let's think a bit. Giving people the vote was a mistake - democracy is a flawed system because the sheep decide over the intelligent people.
On paper women are better when not free, but from a personal point of view I prefer intelligent and emotionally strong women, in a relationship I don't seek a cooking and sex robot as a machine, I want to have some sort of onee-chan in fact. Thus I prefer equality to traditionalism from a personal point of view. I am dazzled, that's why I came to /pol/ for help.
>>138034266
Egalitarianism
>>138034269
Reproduction should be the purpose for the weak, to have 3-5 children, I am fine with having one or maximum two to a loving and intelligent woman.
>>
>>138034427
>Egalitarianism
Also called delusion.
Some drug addict constantly draining resources from society will never be on the same level as someone who actually contributes and does their best.
The reasonable alternative to it is meritocracy.
>>
>>138034548
I am talking about the equality between man and woman. Otherwise I am totally against socialism and a die-hard capitalist.
>>
>>138032823
My gf is a self-proclaimed feminist but hates muslims and niggers with a passion.
>>
I doubt anyone in this thread has the balls to even talk to a girl, let alone pick and choose.
>>
>>138033094
What about free energy?
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2