Is this accurate?
you're implying /pol/ is all attractive, fit men.
>>137954271
No it's not lmao. Theres so many Attractive people who are Liberal as fuck, and some ugly /pol/ acks
>>137954271
Of course it's accurate!
See picture for details.
>>137954271
>occupy democrats
Whatever it says (don't know, I'm not going to read it), the opposite is true.
>>137954699
compare the most ugly cringe people in the alt right with those crazy commies and you'll see that all the ugliest people are commies
>>137954271
Old Communists stood for something. These new communists are worst larpers than the nazis.
They crave to be edgy, but also want to appeal to women.
The only thing they're really hoping is to redistribute a salvageable girl to fuck them.
>>137954271
Not really, but yeah most alpha guys aren't cucks or just aren't concerned with politics.
>>137955405
that fucking ID jesus christ
>>137954271
Yes, although the point about high test doesn't mean that everyone who's racist is attractive. High-test individuals flourish where there is a more traditional/ tribal lifestyle, and racism is product of that.
Its completely true that weaker individuals favor redistribution. Its how the left operates. Its a huge agglomeration of people who would be stamped out of the gene pool without the social safety net
>>137954669
you're implying /pol/ is all white nationalists
>>137954271
what's with that typeface?