Just your daily reminder that hate speech is not free speech.

>>137904123
daily reminder to kys

>>137904123
Yes it is.

Pictoline is AIDS

>>137904384
kek

>>137904384
Kek. Zyklon Ben does it again.

>>137904123
Everyone has some perfectly reasonable sounding argument why they get special cases to oppress people who threaten their power, and Popper was a moron who didn't understand Hegel or Marx.

>>137904384
Glad someone fixed it

File: minimalist.png (6KB, 208x243px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 208x243px

>>137904123
>Karl Popper
>Jew

>>137904123
It's a false paradox.
Whoever wrote this probably failed the logic classes of his philosophy major.

File: 1502852323292.gif (240KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 320x320px

>preserve tolerance by being intolerant towards tolerant people
I mean I know that Karl Popper was a liberal and thus an enemy of whoever made this image but still, if people aren't inciting violence, crime, or riot, they should be allowed to say whatever they want. The people attacking them are the ones inciting violence, crime, and rioting.

>>137904123
>we are tolerant
>except with "x" group
Mental gymnasium at full potential
Look at these idiots jump & flip
>DO A FLIP FAGGOT!!

>>137904123
nice filename faggot

This makes the assumption that a tolerant and open society is desirable.

File: ADL.jpg (389KB, 865x1762px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 865x1762px

>>137904123

Sucking up to the kikes is not an option.
We get it, you dense ameri-goy (pardon the pleonasm)

Nigger kike chink beaner faggot paki

>>137904123
It is in my country, leaf.
Sage for lack of content.

>>137904123
Just a daily reminder that it is.

>Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

>>137904123
>"What does your (((dad))) do for a living?"
>"He's a professional mental gymnast"

>1 post by this ID.
GTFO slide fag

fucking sage'd

>>137904123
Just a daily reminder that yes it is, unconstitutional Marxist traitor. If you disagree, leave the country before we throw you out.

Ignore this garbage bait/slide thread.

>>137905549

and why wouldn't it be?

File: you are the alt left.jpg (66KB, 1426x732px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1426x732px

>>137904123
So basically what you're saying is we have to stop tolerating the Alt-Left?

>>137904384
Nice.

>doublethink

>>137904123
>Just your daily reminder that hate speech is not free speech.
ok.. then the party in power gets to decide what hate speech is. You comfy with that?

>>137904123
>Being tolerant is self-destructive
Stop the presses.
This is what we tried to tell you guys the whole time.

>>137904123
Daily reminder of go back to leftypol

Unless you want Nazis. You must be Nazis.

No shit dunbfuxk. And The left worship this guy LMAO.

It's called Natural Law dumbfucks. In the state of nature it at the state level there is no law only violence.

The projection of personal morality into an actor within the sphere of natural law is always a mistake, but citizens demand it so that the state does not become the monster.

Aka these people are fascists

>>137904123
Thats correct but not in the way it thinks it is...

... the person that's violating free speech is the one oppressing the "nazi." There is nothing wrong with saying you're a Nazi or liberal fag or whatever, but the problem is when you *act* on it. THIS is the line the left always crosses. They confuse ideas with action.

They're the kind of people that punch you in the face because you said you'd *LIKE* to punch them in the face. So they reason out that they're punching you in the face to fight violence....

>>137905104
>>preserve tolerance by being intolerant towards (in)tolerant people

fix'd that for you, might help with the confusion

>>137910133
If they aren't engaging in violence, suppression, or refusal to discourse, they aren't intolerant. Doesn't matter what their beliefs are.

>>137904123
Yeah I don't want to tolerate commie bullshit.

>>137904123
So unless we police our beliefs and thoughts, humans naturally become literally hitler?

File: Popper.jpg (40KB, 640x878px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 640x878px

Popper drew the line when people start calling for murder and persecution of others. He didn't draw it at the speaking of intolerant thoughts.
>I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

>>137904123
>being tolerant requires doublethink

doubleplus good!

>>137904123
>To allow the intorelant take Power.
Yeah becuase if intorelant take Power by spreading their beliefs and gaining Power democraticly becuasse the people want them to.yeah thats wrong and that would that our opionen wouldnt rule.

>>137904123

There is no such thing as hate speech.

There is no such thing as free speech.

The strong say what they want.

The weak say what then can.

Popper's paradox is an admission that the sole governing factor of speech is strength.

The luxury of tolerance is only sustainable if coercion can be successfully applied to the intolerant.

>>137904384
>>137904384
>>137904384