APOLOGISE

File: 1497525655628.jpg (303KB, 598x714px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 598x714px

>this guy

>>137902023
Guy on the rights isn't an underwear model though.

>>137903157
yet he has shoots with only underwear

>>137902023
Guy on the right taught undergrad students aka "adults"

The word, "literally" is not used literally at all in this context.

>>137902023
>not posting the teaching assistant's pics
Laaaaaame

>>137902023
The guy on the right became a model AFTER he was a teacher. While I agree that being fired because you used to be an underwear model is retarded, the situations are not comparable.

>>137904870
This, where them nudes?

>>137902023
>they're both not teachers anymore

what's the issue

>>137903849
>Is now an armani model
Well, it's almost like he's not a teacher anymore.

>This is literally sexism and misogyny
Correct, both pieces are designed to attract female readers. One shows an attractive female they can have feelings about, the other shows an attractive male they can have feelings about - preferably that they are not attractive enough and need to buy things, either to become more attractive or to escape feelings of unattractiveness.
please put more effort into your threads

File: AaOlj59-.jpg (142KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1252x1252px

>Was an model and now is a teacher
vs.
>was a teacher and now is a model
reading comprehension

>>137902023
>if a key opens lots of locks, it's a master key
>if a lock is opened by any key, it's a shitty lock