>Local coffee shop starts adding a 12% surcharge for being male
>sircharge.kek
>annoyed, have angry words with some friends
>one of them usually gets his coffee there, now he just makes his female assistant buy it for him
>surcharge is raising funds to battle the gender pay gap
>ironic
pic relate
>>137859209
Just don't hire women desu senpai
>>137859209
Boycott
>>137859396
The effort...
Most of country is right on board with this shite and it getting alot of support
finna kms myself
>>137859209
illegal?
>>137859209
Honestly, this is a pretty good idea. There's a cafe close to me that does this too. It's a good way of doing consciousness raising.
>i identify as a woman
Checkmate
>>137859571
Apparently its not enforced but the little sjw cucks who run the place get pissy if you dont pay
>>137859788
had the boys all ready to do this
>>137859786
raising consciousness for something that doesn't exist
no thanks
>>137859971
Women get paid less than men. They get promoted less given equal qualifications. They get discriminated against around family issues. They get harassed and raped much more. Honestly, I think this extra cost is pretty fair and it draws attention to one of the big issues that Western societies haven't learned to fix yet.
>>137860280
Men work more. They work fare more dangerous jobs, ect. You're cherry picking. If women did the same work but cost less, all companies would only hire women.
>>137860280
>promoted less given equal qualification
There is literally no instance where you can prove a man and woman have equal qualifications and are offered different salaries and opportunities by the same employer.
>Full time year round workers
women take more leave, less overtime and take on jobs that are payed less because they require less effort than men
>discriminated against regarding family issues
have you seen custody rates in divorces? its a fucking joke
>big issue
women belong in the kitchen, lower wage encourages their natural role
>>137859209
>the gender pay gap
??? no such thing, not in any western country anyway.
>>137860811
exactly my point
>>137859209
So paying more is paying the same? What? And how would this work if a man decided to identify as a female when entering the shop?
>>137860892
its a shitty money grab
article details their autism
https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/food-wine/food-news/95801384/nelson-cafe-charges-men-more-than-women-to-raise-gender-pay-gap-awareness
>>137859824
Please someone go and film their hissyfit.
>>137860892
I do wish some shitlord would start a "we're all trannys" pseudo science movement and just crash their little club.
>>137859209
Free market, faggots. All you have to do is boycott it if you are male and the strong empowered womyn will go out of business.
>>137861223
Half of nz is cucked into thinking this is progressive and cutting edge thinking, hence the news lapping it up and shitheads supporting it
I thought about that whole scenario
> go on date
> coffee cheaper for women
> women start buying coffee for men
> roles reverse and men get spoiled
>>137861378
like every fad this will pass. and some weeks down the line people will start asking themselves if they really should be paying too much for coffee. and they will stop going there.
>>137859209
Holy fuck that's some faggy shit
>>137860280
>get paid less than men for equal qualification
Why the fuck would you stay there if you don't agree with your employer stance ?
Protip: work for the Governement, they dosen't care for the gender, you're all numbers anyways
>>137859209
how can we make feminist aids rates increase? we need to get on this.
>>137860280
that's what you get for your seat in a sinking ship and dodging drafts.
>>137859209
Isn't that basically sex-based discrimination? There ought to be a law that prevents this from happening.
>>137859571
>gender doesn't limit my athletic abilities
>track and field
But it absolutely does and there is 100% documented proof--look at the official men's and women's world records for track and field events.
Pay your little sister the same as a married with two kids mister?
I don't think so.
>>137861621
sarcasmposting m'lady
>>137860280
False.
In the UK women and men under 40 earn the same.
Over 40 is a different story, but is mostly explained by a higher proportion of part time female workers.
>>137860280
aussie trolling is always a wonder to behold. so honed. so perfect in execution and sincerity.
>>137860280
And which industry or industries does that chart cover?
If it covers all then it would have the financial effect of jobs that only can men do or men predominantly do.
>>137860280
>They get harassed and raped much more
Except males don't report that shit because of the stigma, faggot.
>>137859571
Let me see her spread asshole.
>>137861621
not sure what they mean by this aside using kindergarten insults to justify an ad for ladies but yeah, biology and things like that
>>137860280
>>137861736
>In the UK women and men under 40 earn the same.
You're wrong though, women between ages 20-35 earn more than men
>Private company complaining about gender wage gap
If their women are paid less then I can see a far easier solution.
>>137861621
REEEEEE muh stronk womun ideal REEEEE
I hope they virtue signal themselves right out of business.
>Women are supposedly paid 25% less than men
>Companies don't just hire women exclusively
I don't get it. If I could reduce my labor cost by 25% flat out, why would I hire a man? Oh right, because reality and shit.
it is apparent where pol stands upon this matter
>>137861992
True, not by much though. Isn't it like a 5% deficit?
>>137859209
Shouldn't the best performing companies be all women then? Labour is a significant cost in a companies budget
>>137860280
in Australia it is illeagal to pay 1 gender more/less than another.
your graph..what country?
your rape stats tho...