Was Nazi Germany really totalitarian by design or was it in response to the war?
>>137847065
there was no end game for the nazis
socialism cant work
this is why trump supporters who supp white nationalism arnet nazis
capitalism and love of everyone buddy
>>137847232
that fact that socialism doesnt work doesnt mean that national socialism had no end game.
>im not implying i know that end game
>>137847065
Totalitarian in the sense of the total removal of Jewery, degeneracy, marxists, capitalists, corruption, etc. from the German nation.
>>137847735
so what was the end game?
>>137848522
Presumably, after society had been cleansed and the next generation of leaders for the Reich had been established, the economy would have moved even further towards the free market, except for certain industries. Patrols and police presence was expected to be drastically reduced, because all the undesirables would have been gone and the pure German nation would have been a peaceful one. Open espousing of ideologies hostile to the Reich would still have been suppressed, of course, but as with general crime that was expected to move towards zero as the Reich became harmonious.
>>137848522
The end game of the war? Endsieg of course, and the obliteration of the Soviet union in Europe.
The end game of Hitler was establishing an everlasting Germanic Reich which would be the dominating force on the planet. At least that's my interpretation of it.
>>137847065
You know they literally had the Olympics there mid-Reich right? It was totalitarian in response to the war.
>>137849178
interesting. so it really was a pure reactionary movement
>>137849652
A reaction to the unfair treatment of Germany post-WW1 by the Allies, and also to the communist-marxists (jews) attempting revolution in Germany, yes
>>137850201
>tfw liking national socialism more and more everyday
>>137847232
> implying soc in natsoc is the marx soc
imagine my soc
>>137850448