Have Libtards always existed (i.e. people who follow goodfeel-but-destructive ideals)? Is their any evidence of them in antiquity, or is our understanding of social context from back then too vague?
Any discussion of pre-Obama Libtards is fine here. Not really a JQ thread.
>>137773820
not defending crazy liberals but to be fair, its how /pol/ reacts most of the time
>ignore facts
>Obamas fault
>SJW!
>>137773820
Leftism is the current status quo. There have always been retards who defend the status quo without question.
>>137773820
>>137773820
>Have Libtards always existed (i.e. people who follow goodfeel-but-destructive ideals)?
Yeah, they are the ones that gave us the right to vote, women the right to education and property, gave us 40 hour work weeks, eradicated feudalism/monarchies, enforced environmental standards, etc
Guess who fought them the whole way by claiming progress would destroy everything? Conservatives
>>137775958
libtard detected
>right to vote
true democracies are insane and don't work
>women the right to education and property
irrefutably a bad thing
>40 hour work weeks
don't stop there, you forgot unions and welfare
>enforced environmental standards
*china teleports behind you*
>>137773820
Liberalism in say the 1800s was a totally different beast than it is today. Sure some guys would have been fairly liberal by supporting democracy, but they would never have imagined all races being equal, trannies, and all the other horsecrap that goes on today.
The media they surround themselves with is subliminally persuading them that their degeneracy is natural and should be celebrated. It's all about normalizing this degeneracy to establish a global wide Soddom-Gomorrah culture. It is at this point the (((elites))) will seize all control and establish the (((New World Order))).
>>137775144
it typically goes more like this
>non-happenings
>conspiracy investigations that go nowhere
>shills causing chaos for hours at a time
at least our guys are on the offensive more often than not
>>137775144
this 100%
/pol/ needs to get back into the habit of thinking outside the talking points. You faggots have fallen into the same shit-pile as the people you vilify. Just look at the OP's post. There is no concrete discussion, only "hurr durr libtards".
Get it together.
>>137776987
>>137778144
>There is no concrete discussion, only "hurr durr libtards".
If you don't understand the context, you have no ground to criticize.
>>137778927
I understand the context, but I'm pointing out that YOU are one of those people.
>>137779242
This thread is meant to discuss a specific facet (historical significance) of what most of us here already understand (liberal degeneracy), not to justify something for you.
>>137773820
Yes they've always existed. They used to be called judeans or jews. Some of them still are.
>>137773820
Contrary to popular opinion, the KKK was leftist
>>137779523
Nice blog
>>137780135
Southern Italians, man, fucking subhumans
>>137773820
the movie pcu the show married with children the show all in the family.
>137777777
>>137773820
>Have Libtards always existed?
I doubt this vermin existed before the french revolution. Before then, some king would have made the process short with anyone that was this dangerously stupid.
>>137781500
And before European kings?