Anti-white bias in image search results

File: 50s American family.jpg (35KB, 376x436px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 376x436px

>>137678893
For reference, this was the widely-accepted and demographically accurate image of what it meant to be a white couple and white family just a few decades ago.

File: war on whites is a myth.png (1MB, 932x909px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 932x909px

>>137678893

>>137679447
"No, goyim - we're not stealing from you!"

That the Amazon Post claims something is almost proof of its opposite. Hilarious that their picture of "there's no war on whites!" has almost no white people in it.

File: Innocent Cat.jpg (54KB, 500x320px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x320px

>>137679447

well that's pretty scary

File: DDG "white women and white children".jpg (317KB, 1121x795px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1121x795px

DuckDuckGo results for "white women and white children"

>>137678893
Wow. Black couple and Asian couple work just fine. I am tired of Googles shit. Fuck them.

>>137682560
I wouldn't say it's only Google (though of course Google will distort search results to suit their cultural agenda all the time).

I think that we see this effect at most major search engines indicates there's a top-down push to indoctrinate/program white women - and white women specifically - into believing that having a reproductive relationship means a black man.

This is actually far more sinister and serious than simply Google et al twisting the search results.

Women are targeted because they're more easily influenced than men, white women are targeted because it's the white race that needs to be bred out of existence first if the plan to enslave humanity is to succeed.

File: Yahoo search for "white women" (with quotes).jpg (227KB, 1142x720px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1142x720px

Here's Yahoo's result for what it means to be one of "white women."

Notice one is either a white woman, or a white woman with a black man.

Search engine results are the mirror with which much of humanity sees itself. By subtly subverting the image in the mirror so white women are programmed to believe that what it means to be a "white woman" is to "be in a reproductive relationship with a black man," the white race will be bred out of existence.

For style points, note especially that the black men are paired with the fairest white women - pale skin, blonde hair.

This reproductive subversion is a parallel attack front to the reproductive-rate and immigration strategies being deployed in Europe.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-14 at 4.15.49 AM.png (710KB, 2504x810px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 2504x810px

exact same search in spanish

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-14 at 4.14.20 AM.png (870KB, 2496x816px) Image search: [Google]

870KB, 2496x816px

>>137684456
exact same search in spanish

>>137684488
Wasn't that one an incredible fuck you? The first light-skinned result is two gay guys - sacrificing their race to raise a black baby.

File: DuckDuckGo search for "white children".jpg (292KB, 1122x790px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1122x790px

Here's what DuckDuckGo says "white children" are supposed to look like.

>>137678893
What the actual fuck it's the exact same on yahoo, this is some next level jewish subversion

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-16 at 1.00.37 AM.png (3MB, 2160x1156px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2160x1156px

compare to spanish search results and it's a mega wtf

>>137684488
>Poor Little Brown Boy

>>137685254
As I said earlier, I don't think the explanation is simply collusion between the search engines (though of course I wouldn't rule that out, either).

I think what the search results are exposing a systemic attempt by those who control the media (which includes web pages, not just casts) to re-define what white women believe it means to be a white woman - and specifically, what it means to be a white woman in a reproductive relationship (which is the thing to change if one wants to change the breeding characteristics).

So the subversion is far wider and far more serious than just collusion between search engines.

That doesn't rule out collusion. And since Google is the big dog in the search space, all Google - proud supporters of the globalist-Zionist plans - has to do is change their results, and the other search engines will be forced to return results that are similar to Google's.

>>137685690
He'd be confused enough having even *one* daddy - he'll be overwhelmed with two?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-16 at 1.04.59 AM.png (3MB, 2160x1158px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2160x1158px

>>137685169

spanish

>>137685729

Yes. Duckdudckgo leverages google for results, so if google changes algo, it affects duckduckgo.

File: download.jpg (7KB, 234x215px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 234x215px

>>137678893
Google images first result for swede

>>137678893
The reason this is a thing is BECAUSE of /pol/ and similar websites. Look at the results, all butthurt stormfags crying about white women dating black guys.

The same way that BLACKED.com probably gets a huge amount of traffic from /pol/.

/pol/ is actually contributing to the BMWF fetish lol.

File: DuckDuckGo results for european couple.jpg (129KB, 700x482px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 700x482px

>>137686052
It's clear the search engines have an opinion of the future of whites in Europe...

>>137685169

DuckDuckGo is owned by a kike.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-16 at 1.11.53 AM.png (3MB, 2160x1151px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2160x1151px

>>137686340

espanich

what I find very strange is the deliberate overrepresentation of blacks in english search results compared to spanish...

Could it be SJW blogs bumping the seo?

>>137686796

Because George Washington Carver? Scientist AND Inventor? SOO significant he belongs on the first page?
> gtfo

busy bump

>>137686796
Because whites speak English.

Maybe the search results are skewed because people on this high traffic board have been spamming interracial threads for like 5 years.

>>137678893
>one of the bmwf photos of a Nigger that killed her
>wmaf couple has a load of cash due to high IQ
>Trump cucking Bill
What are you complaining about? this is accurate.

File: googleconspiracy3.png (2MB, 2050x1368px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2050x1368px

Other than the gay shit, this doesn't look too bad.

>>137689229
Oh yes, this Mongolian basket weaving forum has more influence on search results than the entire rest of the internet.

>>137680403
That cat reminds me of that dog thing from the black cauldron yawmsayin

Again, the specific target - not just of the search engines, of the forces who control not just the search engines but the media - is white women.

That's why it's searches that ostensibly reflect what it means to be a white woman, and especially a white woman raising white children, are the ones that are so race-mixed.

Because other races have historically been more easily conquered and enslaved, there's less reason to remove them from humanity. It's the ability of whites to defend their cultures against other races that those who would enslave humanity want to eliminate.

If white women are programmed by media to believe they should breed with black men, then it doesn't matter who the white men want to breed with, since there won't be any white women for them.

File: 1496259445974.jpg (170KB, 650x900px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 650x900px

>>137683202
Correct, this appears to be the case, brainwashing to cause genocide, literally.

File: Diamonds and women.jpg (169KB, 1004x766px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1004x766px

White women are being programmed to believe they need and want black men as their reproductive partners just like how women were programmed to believe they need and want diamonds as a sign of love.

Diamonds are common rocks. They used to be "mined" by having lines of blacks with tin cans around their necks crawl across the ground and pick them up. And yet through a subversive and absolutely intentional decades-long media campaign women now associate these glorified pieces of gravel with romance and intimacy - and see them as an *expected* part of a reproductive relationship.

The tiny cult that controls most of the world's money is simply doing what was done with diamonds with black men.

And unless those forces are stopped one day soon white women will expect and want their reproductive relationship to be with a black man just as much as they want a diamond ring.

>"Black Men Are A Girl's Best Friend"

>>137692840
There's a great documentary that show exactly how the DeBeers diamond cartel both monopolized the world's supply of diamonds and programmed western women to believe diamonds are a requirement for romance and reproduction.

Frontline: The Diamond Empire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr760mRwek4

This is exactly what the rulers of society are doing by targeting white women with the marketing strategy to reproduce with black men.

This is coordinated with the globalist controlled government that then provides child support for single mothers. So white men are still required to provide for children, but instead of being able to provide for their own white offspring they are taxed and that support is distributed to women who have bred with black men.

File: Bing search for "women and children".jpg (323KB, 1116x801px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1116x801px

We need a search engine for the search engine results - try to find the white woman amidst "women and children"

Search engine results are a mirror. And white women are being trained to not just expect, but because women are social animals to *want* to see these images when they look in the mirror.

File: European People History.jpg (187KB, 1517x681px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1517x681px

European People History:

>>137678893
>>137682024
>>137684371
>>137685169
>>137689888
>>137695487
>>137695566

Its because when you mention "white" you are distinguishing skin color for a reason, which can be because the other spouse is not white. Its like searching "abled body person" and you get 40% pictures of paraplegics and amputees. When you emphasis something its to make a contrast with something else.

>>137695566
We Wuz Swedes

>>137685579
WTF joogle

>>137685729
racism by and large is always about wombs and who gets access to them. the kikes know this deep down. They are getting at us through our tribe's wombs. They also enjoy polluting our women's wombs with all the degeneracy and porn they push. White genocide is not a meme.

File: Google "white bird".jpg (199KB, 1039x735px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1039x735px

>>137695674
The problem with that claim is it then becomes impossible to find white people. The results "woman" don't show whites (exclusively, they're mixed in), and specific, quoted searches for "white woman" don't show whites either.

Of course, not showing white people is also the goal.

And image searches for "white <object>" have no problem providing uniform results. It's only white women, in reproductive situations, that most suffer this bias.

Again, I'm not saying this is only because of distortions at the search engines - though the search engines are now proudly announcing how they fully intend to distort search results to fit their social agenda.

A program of cultural subversion is like embezzling. It's not a bank robbery. It's supposed to be undetectable. But the cultural effect, as reflected in the mirror of search results, is imo undeniable.

>>137678893
That's because "white" is a buzzword. Look up "caucasian couple" instead.

>>137696841
>It's only white women, in reproductive situations
yep it is only about wombs. They want us gone but they want our women's wombs to be used by others - the ultimate humiliation. Just think how much they must hate us to be pushing for us to go out like that.

>>137695674
when you type in black couple , only black couples show up

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>137678893
dipshit

File: DHOqObWXgAIabka.jpg (241KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 900x1200px

>>137696291
The useful thing about what the globalists thought was their honeypot trap of the "alt-right" and Charlottesville is it will allow - because the left will now not stop talking about it - open discussion of these ideas.

I saw stuff on Twitter tonight that I wouldn't believe people would feel safe openly saying just a month ago, just random people talking about how it's clear the MSM is pushing for the destruction of the white race.

And over here now the history of slavery is being brought into it, since some of the angry black Antifa destroyed a Civil War statue (which was, fittingly enough, dedicated to the Confederate conscripts who were killed - in other words, slaves).

So the lancing of this festering white genocide boil will in the end be good.

File: IMG_2046.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>137678893
That's odd the black couples one are all black couples

>>137697395
Oh, yeah, that's why the MSM is full of talk of "caucasian supremacists."

Hey, here's a great song for you - it's Michael Jackson's "Black or Caucasian."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RuAlyNclck

>>137678893
"white couple -black"

File: Google "asian children".jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>137697911
Yep, all the asian children are also exactly as one would semantically expect - asian.

File: 1224677.gif (990KB, 500x253px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 500x253px

>>137682024
>greyscale photos of the actual white children, symbolizing death or things of the past

>>137697467
>just random people talking about how it's clear the MSM is pushing for the destruction of the white rac

that is good news anon. I dont hesitate to tell people re white genocide and many people are starting to agree with me. We got to make sure as many people are talking about it as possible.

>>137697395
noone searches for Caucasian in search terms people you dumb cunt.

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1582x1058px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1582x1058px

>>137678893

Because what kind of weirdo looks up "white couple" ? Change the search terms a bit and you end up with just two examples of racemixing (the two types that /pol/ is most likely to engage in) and one explicitly non-American couple.

>>137679253
This is rarer than a nigger family today....

>>137698431
The point of this thread isn't search engine syntax.

The point of this thread is the effect that standard, semantically sensible, and thoroughly dominant syntax has on the image the white race has of itself - especially wrt to reproduction.

File: Man what a story.png (1MB, 1332x625px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1332x625px

Equality in the works

>>137698850
Another person who either doesn't understand the issue or is intentionally obfuscating it.

Your "just change the search terms until you get the answer you expect" is precisely backwards.

It's that by presenting people with a certain set of results - ones that are subtly skewed so as to change expectation over time - people will expect to see in the world the images their semantically sensible search engine results give them.

In particular, think of white girls who are as they grow up exposed to a saturation of images of white women with black men. When those girls reach reproductive age those girls will expect to have their reproductive partners look like the ones they were shown.

It's even less likely for people to have any suspicion their search results are wrong when every other query structured the same way works exactly as one would expect.

>>137699830

Well just make sure that your kids don't learn about the world based on google image searches I guess

File: happy family.png (3MB, 1888x948px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1888x948px

>>137678893
Everything seems to be checking out on my end

File: blacked?LOLiThinkNot.jpg (3MB, 1664x6340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1664x6340px

>>137678893

File: Peter_der-Grosse_1838.jpg (235KB, 894x1200px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 894x1200px

>>137696690
> top right
I never understood these. It's a Western problem, it's not a thing in any Russian speaking country. Is Russia trying to LARP as a Western country again?

>>137700263
It's not everywhere, but that it's all these places is a tell, a giveaway like the repeated black cat in "The Matrix."

These effects aren't even supposed to be noticed at all. They're supposed to seem natural, spontaneous, like women suddenly deciding diamonds were a sign of love.

We mustn't wait until the effects are so socially widespread they can't be reversed before we work to stop it.

File: TOPKEK.png (2MB, 1905x926px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1905x926px

>>137678893
i dont know what to think about duckduckgo anymore

File: 1309889932373.jpg (19KB, 493x387px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 493x387px

>>137678893
>Trump and Hillary

>>137678893
lol @ hillary and trump being a top result

File: 123.jpg (571KB, 1902x885px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1902x885px

Whites are the default race.
When you search "white couple" you are distinguishing race and you're more likely to get results relating to a topic or article about race which results in interracial couples instead.

File: First search result for "white woman".jpg (55KB, 692x693px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 692x693px

We seem to have reached the time of night when 4chan submission takes so long to update it's hard to tell if they've worked, so I'm going to head out.

I hope anyone reading this thread understands the issue here isn't merely Google distorting search results to push their globalist social agenda (though they do that all the time).

The crucial idea is these search results reveal there is a program, pushed from the top of society down by the people who control media and communication, to by showing highly impressionable white women and white children a distorted picture of what it means to be "white," change the internal image of what is the expected reproductive partner from white man to black man.

And by programming women to expect to have children with black men instead of white men - cultural subversion at the reproductive level - this program is intended to lead to the elimination of the white race.

That is why it must be stopped.

I'll leave you with the #1 result returned at Yahoo for the search "white woman."

Just tested this, It's accurate.

If you type in Black couple the entire page is niggers.

If you type in Hispanic couple the entire page is beans.

Fuck right off Google.

File: 1484165378598.jpg (152KB, 1334x697px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1334x697px

>>137679447
>"war on whites" is a myth
>post a picture with a bunch of non-whites.

real activates my almonds.

File: 4d285050b35c947417257bf24d5fe456.jpg (486KB, 1215x714px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1215x714px

>>137701042
also try white only family

Okay lazy niggers. This is how you defeat the globalists.
You play the long game. You abandoned all their platforms and use sites like Gab and stay here
We fund and start our own search engine
We start producing our own content that is advertiser friendly
We keep all the money we make in our inner circle while slowly extracting money out of their circle.
This is what China is doing to us now
They are pushing this Race war and funding it BTS to keep you all occupied with some BS war for Muh White Race

>>137701488
Notice my Digs. Hitler speaks through me. Now stop bitching and start doing

If you just type "couple" You'll still get mostly white people. No need to type "white" anything.

Then what search would you guys recommend? If DuckDuckGo and Google are out of the question, what are other good, objective search engines that don't try to shove an agenda down your throat?

>>137678893
>looks up Faroese family
>then American family
fucking kek

>>137701488
1488