It's like every time someone tries to start a peaceful political rally, the extremists show up and fuck things up. Whenever the left tries a peaceful protest, the anarchists and communists show up and fuck it up.
Whenever the right tries a peaceful protest, the Nazis and white supremacists show up and fuck it up.
It is the same shit on a different day. This proves once again that the extremists on both sides need to be destroyed.
This is what happens when you don't regulate who comes into your protests. Why does no one get this right? Both sides need to learn this.
I guess it's back to centrism for me.
>Centrism: Where You Can Feel Superior To Everyone While Offering Solutions For No One!
>>137653789
Motherfucker, there is solutions. For an example, abolishing the two-party system and replacing it with a multi-party system.
>>137654501
>For an example, abolishing the two-party system and replacing it with a multi-party system.
Oh wow, somehow outlawing people's ability to vote for certain parties will totally fix a society dominated by wedge issues and sound bites! Got any more oversimplified platitudes you can bless us with? Maybe you can tell us how we can fix gun control by just outlawing sales to people with mental problems, or how we can just legalize and tax drugs.
Protesting is for stupid fucking marks.
>>137654936
>"somehow outlawing people's ability to vote for certain parties will totally fix a society dominated by wedge issues and sound bites!"
>outlawing
Are you this retarded? Whoever said a multi-party system would outlaw people's ability to vote for certain parties? It actually does the complete fucking opposite.
You are the worst autist ever.
>>137656036
>Whoever said a multi-party system would outlaw people's ability to vote for certain parties?
What are you going to do if the vast majority of people vote for one of two parties, as they do right now?
>>137655681
that's a stupid thing to say.
>>137656464
They won't, because there is more options for them to accommodate their political views, allowing for smaller parties to have a better chance.
>>137658101
>They won't, because there is more options for them to accommodate their political views, allowing for smaller parties to have a better chance.
That seems awfully presumptuous of you. What if the vast majority of people feel best represented by only two parties?
>>137658471
They won't.