Physical Removal

>>137620340
Only if they violate the NAP

>>137620340
>In an anarcho-capitalist, would Nazis be physically removed?
nobody would be removed because that would violate the NAP

>inb4 he's a newfag that circlejerks around Hoppe the closet-fascist
Hoppe is probably the ideological cuck out there atm
the man is despiratly tryingt to uncuck libertarianism/ancaps without realising he's turned into a closet-authoritarian

>>137620340
Of course National Socialists would be removed. They aren't "pro-west", they're pro Germany 1938.

being a natsoc is the declaration of intent of committing aggression against blacks, jews, gyppos or whatever, and just like being a commie is a declaration of intent to violate property rights and thus would be removed, being a nazi warrants the same reaction

Seeing as you'd have freedom of speech in an ancap society I'd imagine that no one could be physically removed for holding any specific worldview. It would violate the NAP to physically remove someone without them first enacting unprovoked violence. If Nazis were to enact unprovoked violence, they would have violated the NAP. thus warranting their physical removal. As it stands though, by just being Nazis. why would that warrant their physical removal had they not already enacted unprovoked physical violence.?

>>137620877
Hoppe libertarians are good allies, also hoppe is a pretty good read for every fascist.
You should come to the /lrg/ when it is up.

File: 695d5c49-6c7f-4fdf-a67f-1dd1da500945.png (603KB, 709x945px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 709x945px

>>137624207
Most people grow out of fascism and embrace Hoppe, not the other way around

>>137624671
>Most people grow out of fascism and embrace Hoppe, not the other way around
Same with me, but I would still consider myself a fascist since I am not interested in the material aspect of fascism.
and if I wouldn't have known that hoppe is a libertarian I would have count him also to fascism.

>>137623966
Because being a Nazi is a declaration of intent to initiate aggression should the opportunity present itself

>>137626652
You could say that about any belief system in order to shut it down. That's why the NAP is so cut-and-dry about letting people speak freely.

>>137627000
That could very well be the case. But a Nazi is more likely to attack a jew or a nigger if the opportunity presents itself than a jew is likely to attack me for eating a bacon cheeseburguer. The reason for the physical removal of Nazis is the same that justifies the reason for the physical removal of Muslims. My commie comparison wasn't as accurate, if I'm being honest.

And agreed, freedom of speech is of utmost importance. But a declaration of intent to violate the NAP, i.e. a threat, is a violation of the NAP in itself.

>>137626652
It is not about that indicates agression because of race, but given that most of them are white welfare whores they will sooner or later try to steal from you, like every communist community, even if they are voluntarily in it,
this will violate the property rights of others in which case they will be shot and the whole group would be chased out of town buy righteous people there.
so yes natsocs would be removed but for different reasons.

>>137620340

Removing communists for being communists is a violation of the NAP.

>>137621149
>being this retarded
The political/economic ideology of the Nazi Party was National Socialism. Just as any nation can be Fascist, Anarcho-Capitalist, Libertarian, Liberal, Socialist, any nation can be National Socialist.
The Nazi Party was a political party in 1930's Germany. National Socialism is an ideology that is not bound by an era or geographical border.
Dumb fuq

>>137620877
Property rights my dude. Enforcing property rights ain't authoritarian

>>137628584
the NAP has to die desu
it is just how normal people handled savages based on european conservative values over thousand of years, but nowadays it is overthought to the point where it is dead.

File: 1493796004954.jpg (405KB, 954x1600px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 954x1600px

>>137622489
You don't know much about anarcho-capitalism do you...

>>137628977
property rights are the most authoritarian thing you can have.

>>137629218
proto-commie

>>137629389
No that's a good thing, how should hierarchies form without authority over your property.

>>137629622
>hierarchies
>authority over your property
>that's a good thing,

you must be jew here

>>137629791
are you some kind of egalitarian leftist?
Or are you just afraid of the endgame of your ideology?
You think a CEO shouldn't have full authority over his company, or that a land owner should have full authority over his land?
How will you ever produce something complex without hierarchies?
how will you prevent a class war without clear hierarchies?

>>137620340
Ancaps can't even build roads, how the hell are they going to remove anyone, let alone nazis?

>>137630449
let people trade

>>137630986
yeah and people will make good deals while degenerates will make bad deals, and the sum of all human actions will lead to hierarchies.
then u have two ways
1. you accept the grown hierarchies, because those families always made good decisions and you respect them or
2. you cry for a big government who tax the shit out of them and redristibutes it to you, or you go full commie and just take it from them because you think you deserve their property just for existing.

>>137620340
If you want to live as a slave with no rights be my guest I would not want violence done to others but if you are for violence then so am I.

>>137630986
the market can build driveways, which are pretty much just smaller roads.

>>137629087
>in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance towards those habitually promoting life-styles incompatible with this goal
He is talking about particular covenants built with that purpose. A different covenant could have a different purpose and those who would suffer physical removal would be a different group.

> will have to be physically removed, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order
IN THAT COVENANT not ALL covenants

>>137631828
Nsdap here, I dont see how workers not being organized is good for them.

Did NSDAP Germany force workers to have more benefits rights qnd pay?
They were free to travel and fuck off if they wanted lesss pay in US of Poors.

File: National_Fascist_Party_logo.svg.png (15KB, 175x248px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 175x248px

Ancap is just anarchism, which is retarded. You need law and order and someone or something to push civilization forward.