Are western women officially obsolete?
Not really, but they are collectively shit testing men. Issue with shittests at this magnitude is if you don't reject and leave them, then she'll assume you're a weak push over who can be shittested and leave you for it.
There's actually no win condition. Shit tests are designed to make you fuck off, that or to establish control, but at this stage women can't handle controlling men. They can't respect controllable men.
So yes, western women are obsolete because you can't actually date them. You can feed them alcohol and fuck them, but you can't actually romantically connect to establish something like a good sibling relationship with sex, as in marriage material.
>>137479019
>because you can't actually date them
Sad!
>>137479019
>establish something like a good sibling relationship with sex, as in marriage material.
Seek professional help
>>137480262
Lol that's a troll.
Whereas what I'm describing is the root of western female sexual frustration, or rather romantic frustration. They can't realise that the way they've designed their social skills is better at repelling men, especially attractive men (because imposter syndrome) than gaining rapport with a reliable, high quality man.
Western women can't be considered attractive unless you admit it's purely physical and even then all the fat positivity throws that into question. If you want to be thicc, you need a female body builders body. This is as difficult as being a cardio bunny.
>>137480834
I understand how that looks, but if you can live with your sister harmoniously, instead of devolving into sibling rivalry or tiny, stupid fights, chances are you can live with a woman who periodically thinks you'll never leave.
By sibling, I mean a family like relationship. Unless you're a degenerate, marrying someone means accepting them into your family. She becomes your father's daughter, you become her mother's son.
>>137481625
>Lol that's a troll.
kek I hope you're right.