Hello /pol/,
I'm thinking more and more that if we can't change society and stop it from running into a wall, maybe what we should do is find/establish our own place.
If you remember, we had not too long ago a thread about "which government most closely match your political view". It seems that there were a lot of people identifying with a very small "country" (if you can call it that way) called "Liberland".
Is it a possible place where we could fit and develop our own society?
Can something be done?
And for those who just heard about that place, what do you think about it?
>>137428584
Weird, I have a Liberland flag on my wall, Anon.
>thoughts on it
I think it's a form of political protest for Vit, similar to the Sealand protest, declaring a principality and planning to broadcast from it as a "fuck you" to BBC regulations. The problem is, for some weird reason, it attracts autists and nerds who can't see past the quirkiness to understand it's not really meant to be taken literally (I doubt Vit actually believes it'll be the next Monacao, it floods half the year) - it's symbolic.
There is a new place, I think, opening up in Norway (?) called Liberstad, which is a large area of property where people are set to live on libertarian principles. But the problem is that the land was bought from the government, so if they wanted to they could come a-knocking -- you can't own guns, have new drug regulations, etc. This was tried by some millionaire in the Pacific ocean, and looked promising, he even made his own island, but the Tongan authorities arrested him and claimed the island as their own because it was in their historic fishing territory. Other countries will always grab land, because large masses of politicians are always autistic children.
The best plan is Free State Project or State of Jefferson.
>likeminded people move to XYZ
>stage peaceful protests and acts of civil disobedience
>campaign for your ideas
>get elected
>educate yourself and vote your bros in
>before you know it, you have a libertarian state