What would happen if NATO members fought eachother?

>>137398332
we would have ww3, then a guy in montana would invent warp drive which would attract the attention of the vulcans. this would usher in a new era of peace and prosperity for mankind

>>137398332
If (((they))) want to force Poland to take immigrants, then they'll likely false flag human rights violations and "restore peace". Same as in Ukraine.

>>137398332
if a nato member attacks other nato member, the whole alliance is forced to defend against the initial attacker, meaning RIP who ever fires a first shot.

>>137398332

All depends on who you (US) sides with, since the rest of the NATO excepting maybe France is very grossly underfunded.

Driving all the way to Berlin would be a walk in the park.

>>137399597
Thanks, this was along the lines I was wondering. Basically what the legal groundwork of it was if it was defense a member nation against initial attack or some kind of paradox that would threaten the alliance.

>>137398332
Trump wrestles EU traitors to the ground

USA officials coup the whole damn thing
Nato is now officially American empire
5 eyes and japan/SK added

>>137400019
also
OTAN>NATO

they either defend the country that got attacked like they're supposed to, or do nothing like when Greece and Turkey fought over Cyprus

>>137398332

the attacking part is thrown out of the alliance and then the rest piles on them and remove their government from power, unless the attacker is USA, then the rest leave the alliance and scramble to make other protection pacts as USA is now considered insane and put under international isolation closing in to WW3

>>137400124

officially turkey fought cypris, that's not in NATO, however they got greek military aid, the situation was a mess but both were made to behave

whoever gets attacked by the instigator is who the U.S. will side with

File: shot0054.jpg (170KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1280x720px

>>137398332
>if, for instance, Germany and some other members who were NATO allies decided to try to strong arm Poland (also a NATO ally) over immigration?

Are you seriously retarded enough to think that military action against another EU member has any chance to happen at all?
That's like Texas invading California.
No one would be so stupid.

>>137400002
yeah, but if a few members, lets say Germany France and England attacks Poland, then RIP Poland. And no, USA wont do shit to defend Poland in that scenario.
Nato would dissolve and Poland would be a warzone.

>>137401072
This. International law is one thing. Reality is another. The outcome of international law revolves less around treaties than power.

The question isn't who whose at fault, but who will win

>>137398713

Because of communism :D

File: 1502605927919.png (94KB, 225x231px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 225x231px

>>137398332

Germany would ally with russia, overrun Eurasia and become the next superpower.

>>137401023
This, also we are already niggers working for germans. If germany tries to attack us it's like destroying your own cheap work force, they would never do that. That said they can fuck off with immigrants, there is no power on earth that would force us to take them. Worst case scenario they would try leftist coup in poland but polish society is adamant about it, we don't want shitskins within our border there would be fast revolution, we are not brainwashed.