Was women's right a mistake?

>>137344996
Of course.

>>137344996
yep

a resounding yes

File: turdflingingmonkey.jpg (9KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x225px

>>137344996
Yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUXxLlVKLw

File: womencan'tcompete.jpg (78KB, 690x400px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 690x400px

>>137344996
Biocunts will soon be replaced with artificial wombs and sexbots

Women were a mistake

>>137344996
No, of course this is the non-meme answer. If you have a right to vote and you vote for who ever is the most attractive then whose fault it that you voted on ridiculous merits?

If you take away the make up, the fashion, celebrity gossip, and fringe nerd shit for the undesirable girls. You are left with decent women. Men are supposed to convince women to do things. its biological and keeps the human species alive but there has been a disconnect. Call it what you like. the (((jews))), the markets, beta cucks what ever we are left with women who only think 5 minutes ahead.

"Fuck yeah Tammy lets write slut on us and post pics" They don't know what they want anymore cause they read it from magazines and blogs. I'm not suggesting sharia law but you gotta subtly skim away the bullshit

>>137344996
Yes.
The real question is if we still can go back. Not to 1915, but to 1990.

no the right image is objectively superior

Women's art was a mistake, postmodernism I mean. Affirmative action was a mistake. Synthesising black culture and women's culture, feminism and tumblr, was a mistake. They all basically made it as low standard and as corrupted by nepotism as possible, someone connected can shit on a canvas but someone skilled would be relegated to a quiet place online. The standards here are so corrupt.

Letting women have a say in how their tax dollars are spent is simply right.

>>137344996
A resounding an cacophonous 'yes'.

>>137344996
yes, also contraception

>>137344996
yes.

File: 1501093812550.png (18KB, 637x588px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 637x588px

>>137346063
>no the right image is objectively superior

why

>>137346084
no. they will always vote for weakness. it is their nature

Y E S
E
S

>>137346847
Some women are fairly aggressive or see strength and don't mind their ginnies tingling from it, right wing women do exist.

BTW all your favourite female ecelebs are left wing. Even Ann Coulter, who's just left of center.

No, they just need to be taught to be independent and learn to have their own opinions.

But instead they sacrifice their individuality to appear better and to earn society points.
Only focus is on reputation and whatever is socialy accepted then they blame society for it when its all self inflicted. There are indipendent individuals out there who are intelligent and rational but they sure are rare these days.

>>137344996

"Not as opponent, but as advocate of women's real rights, I oppose the important and disastrous change in the law, contemplated by Woman Suffrage. I anticipate the social revolution, disruption of domestic ties, desecration of marriage, destruction of the household gods, dissolution of the family, which would result from the political enfranchisement of married women."

James McGrigor Allan (1827 - after 1890), British anthropologist and writer.

>>137345998
I literally cant make sense of your incoherent gibberish. KYS. Answer is YES.

>>137344996
What are you, gay? I'd fuck both of those retarded sluts. If my daughter acted like that? I'd slap the shit out of her then disown her until she changed out of necessity. That simple.

Faggots

>>137348301
And exactly this happened. It comes in my mind islam and their way of women right. I'd say they are not so stupid

>>137348686
You're just mad that not even the pathetic whores who write "slut" on their chest would bang you, and think a fixed marriage would fix all your problems.

Again, faggot.

>>137348506
You cant understand the womens mate.

>>137349015
Paco?

>>137349229
No, I'm not beans or rice. Just hate fuckin Muslims and that ultra degenerate society.

File: grandmother.jpg (84KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 700x700px

>>137344996
Yes.

>>137344996

How dare you guys automatically assume we are like the women on the right.

Lots of women have high morals. No wonder a lot of you can't get girlfriends

File: 1492458086002.jpg (375KB, 867x1000px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 867x1000px

Yes

File: 76577hjkhxm67.png (190KB, 483x368px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 483x368px

>>137349835
>we
post tits

>>137349656
Islam has nothing to do with our moral decadence

>>137344996
yes

>>137344996
No but allowing your disgusting misogyny definitely is.

Sincerely the biggest fag on Earth.

>>137349835
tits or gtfo you dumb slut

>>137350267

That's exactly it right there you shit head.

You say women should be ashamed of their behavior but the next minute you want us women to show tits.

WHICH TYPE OF WOMEN DO YOU ASSHOLES WANT?

>>137349775
The reason to why modern women don't leave anything for the marriage is because they have a deep-seated belief that they will never get married.

>>137350634
the kind that only shows me tits

Yes and no. As a woman I believe that we achieved equal rights when we gained the right to vote, be educated, own land, ect. Everything post first wave feminism is a farce. Sadly most women are easily swayed over to the left.

Women in the workforce have massively depressed wages for everyone across the board.

Women tend to not think logically or rationally and vote accordingly.

It was probably the biggest mistake of a generation

File: are women merely parasites because all they do is parasite.jpg (528KB, 1259x1080px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 1259x1080px

>>137344996
>Was women's right a mistake?

> was giving mental cripples rights over society a mistake ?

rhetorical question much. OFC it was idiocy.

------

Remember : the only way to make society humane again, is to physically remove all women over 35, since they are literally the source of 99.99% of all hate , spite and pure evil in our society. eveywhere they are the generate hate and intoxicate everything.hear me out :
did u ever notice, that the absolute majority of hate, retariation, lies and pure evil spewing ppl are old women ?
did u ever notice that the most toxic leftist are almost exclusively old women ?
did u ever notice that the (((press))) is almost exclusively women ?
did u ever notice that the communist , hypertoxic educationsystem is almost exlusively old women ?
and so on and so forth ...
and so on and so forth ...
and so on and so forth ...

Women who are unmarried and have no children are clearly teh worst.
some facts about women :
every woman is a net 250'000$ loss on the tax system per lifetime ( men are a PLUS for society ). In other words : only men pay taxes. without men the system would collapse tomorrow. In other words : women are a burden on society, especially old women, because they have ZERO to give for humanity.
let me explain :
women are utterly mentallly retarded. intellectually complete trash.
other than that, women only spread lies, garbage, vileness, hate, aggrression, injusticce and simply pure evil
physically women are also completely useless.
and so on and so forth ...
and so on and so forth ....
and so on and so forth ...

in short : since all non-mothers, non-wifes by the age of 35 shold and MUST be physicall removed from society, IF society wants to be positive, civil, constructive and humane.

------------
btw :


99% of all feminist leaders are lesbians.

thats why : DEFINITELY physically remove all lesbians asap.

File: 1502487685455.jpg (141KB, 576x543px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 576x543px

>>137350634
It was a test. Nice reflexes

>>137349835
>Lots of women have high morals.

try harder, shill.

> No wonder a lot of you can't get girlfriends
same ol same ol BS to make small retarded minds feel better about themselves.
women are like robots : 100% predictable. they all and always work the same way. they are 0% flexible.
u say something woman dont like to hear ( no safe space ), she will try to insult u and will lie about you.
100% everytime. 100% predictable. 100% always the same 4 or 5 preset responsetypes. 100% 0% intelligence or arguments.

>>137350267
My kids, yeah, in America you can spank your kids. Not beat your wife for showing her face you fuck

File: problem solution 3.png (1MB, 1281x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1281x720px

>>137344996


when will people stop listening to women ?
when will they finally realize - fundamentally - that women are mentally completely underevolved, nothing else than subhumans. their mental capability and nature is way way closer to chimps than to humans ( men ).
they have zero ability to think.
just ignore them and shut them up, remove them when they cannot contain and behave themselves.
also one thing we can learn from sharia even . women MUST be physically punished.
why ? because they have no evolved brain, that menas they cannot learn vrom words. EVER. they MUST be treated like animals ( they are btw ) and be hurt, so that they CAN learn somehing in the first place. it's the ONLY way females are able to learn ANYTHING. again : because they completely lack a (functioning) brain

File: cumul.jpg (44KB, 574x272px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 574x272px

>>137346084
>their tax dollars
What did he mean by this?

>>137351364
>t.virgin
or
>t.got cheated on by an ugly chick

Take your pick

File: 1457701291232.jpg (80KB, 600x534px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 600x534px

>>137350796
>As a woman I

A women in pol? By the way, yep most women choose the politican who has more carisma and shows himself cool, Not the substance.

>>137351350
That guy is talking about gays not womens

>>137351476
If you pay for something, you absolutely must get something in return, even if as a group you pay less.

First wave feminism is a libertarian issue as much as a feminist issue, we started to diverge when feminism didn't end after the SCUMM manifesto was released and the woman behind it kept teaching. This was when feminism became what it is, which is authoritarian Marxism.

>>137344996
White women voted for Trump. So they're not the problem.

>>137351271

The argument here is that it is foolish to say we in the end should not have had rights.

Women have contributed a lot to society in the last 100 years.

You men are not all that cracked up to be

>>137352221
Patriarchism it's an spook.

>>137352000
>If you pay for something, you absolutely must get something in return, even if as a group you pay less.
Do you have any idea what that graph means? What they pay is inconsequential. They are at the receiving end of the welfare system. The whole system's purpose is funneling money from men to women. Why would you give women the vote when that's the case?

>>137351934
Yep, very proud to be white despite the constant attempts at brainwashing by my U and society...so kinda ended up here, naturally.

Totally agreed, most women lack critical thinking and many shouldn't vote as a result. A basic IQ test to vote would be favorable imao.

>>137344996
Obviously yes.

>>137352983
That wasn't clear.

I agree, 4 wolves and 3 sheep cannot vote democratically on dinner. We still haven't figured out how go separate tribalism and sex supremacy from democracy without relying on high iq to accept deferral of gratification. Just because this exists doesn't mean women shouldn't vote.

Although Marxist feminism should be labelled as hate speech, as in speech designed to cause hatred or incite damages or aggression.

>>137344996
No but teaching you how to speak clearly was.

>>137344996
Yea

>>137344996
Yes, as were shitskin rights. Women and shitpeople almost always vote with the Jew.

>>137353536
>A basic IQ test to vote would be favorable imao.

That's where you are wrong. ''Democracy'' is wrong.

>>137353838
Sorry. I speak only 4 languages.

>>137354334
Fascism could work instead of democracy, at least I think. But that's just my opinion. Here I the USofA we're sort of stuck with it now, so at least that might be an improvement.