What would change?

>>137330930
10 percent of the population dead. Millions of refugees heading east. Global recession.

>>137330930

America would be over.

Your new job would be stacking bodies, burying bodies, and burning bodies.

You'd have iodine for breakfast, lunch, and dinner

You'd probably never have children.

Very likely you'd be murdered or die of disease before age 50.

If you didn't you would not live long enough to see things get rebuilt, let alone be great again.

America is a country that rely on consuming.

>>137330930
>California gets nuked
>massive population loss
>state loses electoral votes because of lower population
>california becomes a flyover state

I see nothing wrong with this.

File: nuclear.png (550KB, 620x820px) Image search: [Google]

550KB, 620x820px

>>137330930
North Korea. There can't be a worker revolution to overthrow a dictator if the workers and the dictator are dead.
>>137331133
The capitalist class just loves cheap, disenfranchized labour.
>>137333023
Nukes are not that bad. Korean nukes are especially not that bad.

>>137331133
>>137333023
Maybe the possible nuclear strike on America is why the govenment was stockpiling all those cheap plastic coffins during the Bush/Obama presidency. This nuclear war has been planned years in advance.

>>137337357

This message brought to you by Reynolds tin foil wrap!

i hope they target LA, SF, Portland, or Seattle

>>137330930

Wouldn't only mexicans be affected?

As I understand it California is mostly Mexican.

So why not let Best Korea help clean up?

>>137338159
All of California needs to nuked off the map.