1.Why are some groups who were historically considered non-white like the Jews and the Irish are where only then considered white when they achieved political power?
2. Was whiteness as a concept mainly a reaction to the growing identities of minority groups?
3. Should "white people" give up being white and go back to privileging there ancestor's national, cultural and religious backgrounds?
3.What group are the most white? Why did Hilter change it form the Brits to Germans?
4.What about white hispanics and the various admixtures form Europe?
Etc....
>>137266062
im a jew and i bring that up everytime people give me shit for being white
i mean its 2017 and we have never came close to having a jewish president
>>137266062
IRISH ARE WHITE
>>137266062
>>137266062
White still means Anglo-Saxon. The grouping of non-Anglos into the bag of white with Anglos--was only on the basis that those other groups would behave like anglos. Also, a lot of groups, like Italians and Irish participated in the wonderful pastime of niggerbashing--so as to win the affection of the Anglo.
>>137266305
Pic related
Every white person needs to die for progress to be made
Join me in commiting suicide tonight to disavow white terrorism!
>>137266062
I also believe, as queer as it may sound, that Anglo culture is based around the concept of familial Order. This order in the oikos produces power. So therefore, when Goldstein and Flanagan manage to obtain these--do Anglo is flattered.
>>137267623
IRISH ARE WHITE
Irish have always been white you racist.
Jews on the other hand are only white when it benefits them.
Interesting infographic on IQ distribution by white religious observance.
(((post-moderists))) should all be gassed