Legitimate question here, what exactly is wrong with a single,

>>137201739
Sure. Unite under America.

>>137201739
No escape when Stalin 2.0 comes to power.

Also, read The Road to Serfdom. It explains the problems that socialism runs into as it attempts to be applied to larger communities of diverse peoples.

>>137201827
>united earth

>>137202053
Or you can just read the chapter dedicated to international socialism.

>>137201739
muslims would never allow it. thats why we'll never have world peace. muslims think everyone must be a muslim to ensure peace. and they'll fight othe rmuslims to the death that dont follow their specific version of islam. there will be no peace on earth, until islam is wiped out.

>>137201739
problem one: Authoritarianism.
Lets say you THINK you've come up with a better form of government. So what if it is? Good luck challenging the global hegemony

2. Anti-nationalism. The globalist authority cannot allow 'America' or 'England' or any other nation to keep its national identity. Its people must be made to allow all culture in, to usher a global utopia.

3. Entrenched nobility; Any global system will give to stagnancy.

4.Smaller government locally is better.

>>137201739
If it's a federal republic? Yes.
A socialist democracy? FUCK NO.

>>137202629
Look at America, federal republics are on a slippery slope to turn into socialist democracies. It's a matter of time.

>>137201827
This, especially if we restrict the vote to white men. Women are too emotional, Asians too easily misled into collectivism, and everyone else too dumb.

File: 1278110829151.jpg (91KB, 454x387px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 454x387px

>>137201739
>It would solve all our problems.
Because an oligarchy in Brussels is going to be more egalitarian and open to your calls for accountability?

>>137201739
>If the only reason for conflict is that people are all so different, why not just remove all differences and end all conflict?
T. Retarded globalist

>>137201739
>No more wars
Unless a group of ppl take issue with being ruled by a one world government and start a war against it?
>no more supremacists from any side.
Yeah, sure kid, that's how it's gonna work. That's definitely how it's working out within the EU and USA, right? Just up the scale massively.

Government is best when government is least. You want it to perform essential functions and then get the hell out of the way, not run every last detail of your life.

File: 1501128175074.png (217KB, 568x442px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 568x442px

>>137201739
It would give them all the more liberty and freedom to pump you full of estrogen and carcinogens while you slave away to rent only what a globalist consumer culture allows you to.

>>137201739
>It would solve all our problems.
And what are (((your))) problems that such a setup would solve? Not enough communism?

>>137201739
>No more wars.
Why do normal fags always cite this as the ultimate goal? Violence will always exist so long as people care about things enough to die for them. Do you really want to live in a world where the government is so controlling that peoples can't disagree with one another? -- or worse, a world where everyone is so indifferent that they never resort to violence?

>>137201739
Bureaucracy makes nothing better. Look at EU. It would just be an ever larger shit show of corruption.

Competition is at the core of human existence. We need it on ever level to thrive or atrophy.

>>137201739
Religion ensures that some people will never get along. History does the same. How do you allocate resources?

>>137201739
Fuck off dirty kike.
>1And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. 3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. 4And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? 5And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. 6And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.

>7And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 8And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. 9If any man have an ear, let him hear. 10He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.

>>137201739
Hindus would milk it for all it's worth.

Latinos would pour out Cocaine and Meth at everyone else. Chinks would dish out even more Fentanyl.

Muslims would get flooded with "corrputing" western influences. Jews would leer at them, stalk them to humiliate them. Someone would bomb mecca. The millions of foreign workers in arab gulf would get irate, while also bringing in many more of their kin. Arabs woult be completely irate about this.

Rainforests would get stepped all over. Poachers would fuck things up even faster.

England would export expensive mass surveilance everywhere. Trigger happy american, brazilian and columbian cops would want to operate all over the globe.

Africa would take in aids drugs, use them sloppily and breed resistant strains.

Cuba, Hawaii, Florida and Indonesia would get flooded with people, explode in development, then break down.

India would make all its completely unscrupulous medicine practices available to the whole world.

File: 14983074881966.png (2MB, 960x809px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 960x809px

>>137201739
>what would effectively amount to international socialism would solve all our problems

>>137201739
One single act of terror would fuck it all up. One country would still technically be responsible for that citizen, and that country would be instantly alienated by all the others. Religious fanatics and radicals from any group would dismanted it very quick.

>>137201739

Because there are too many conflicting races, ideologies, and religions.

Blacks are too dumb, muslims are too violent, latins are too corrupt, and so on.

>>137203067

Where the fuck is saint vincent and the grenadines?


DARE I SAY


R A R E S T

A

R

E

S

T

>>137201739

A judeo-despotic UN will treat every single nation like Israel treats gaza and the west bank. We know this because of two things:

a) Jews use war, genocide and terrorism to unify the world. So how can you expect them to noble once it is united?

b) Jewish supremacism has been responsable for unmeasurable destruction, death and oppression.

A UN run by whites without any jewish or marxist element whatsoever, would be genuine utopia. What we're going to get however well be hell on earth. De facto global slavery.

>>137201739
Superior people should not have to share borders, nukes or healthcare with inferior animals.

>>137208275
this

>>137201739
>everyone united under a single banner

Only way that's gonna happen is with an extraterrestrial invasion. Otherwise human nature would guarantee that it won't last long. Just look at what happened to Yugoslavia. Hell, look at what's happing right now in America!