NUKES ARE FUCKING WEAK

>>137066556
Radiation kills asvvell

>>137066656
Not if airburst. And airburst is the way to go to destroy more. Map can show fallout, too. Go check it out.

What truly makes damage is not the explosion itself, but everything that follows.

>>137066556
RADIATED BURGERS

>>137066556
Nice

File: 20170810_053749_HDR.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

Get educated

>1 bomb kills 100.000 people
>weak

Ok

>>137067491
>california
>people

kek

>>137067491
Like I said: many casualties but far from wiping a city.

>>137067375
looks like they used exactly the tool in OP

>>137066556
Nukes are just bombs. Powerful in terms of energy density, but fundamentally a bomb like any other. Most people who think past the veneer or fear mongering realize this.
We retool our nuclear arsenal from large bombs into much smaller tactical warheads because we realized their value was extremely limited.

nuking LA would be an improvement

>>137066556
>few thousand people vanish in a flash of light
>city falls into chaos
>more people die

>nuking LA would do literally nothing guise

>>137067491
The pop of l.a. is 3.976 million (2016)

Where as rome is 2 million. You don't know shit about per capita

File: 1501561232599.jpg (247KB, 591x559px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 591x559px

The only "nuke" going off is the one Mossad is planning.

>>137067867
>population goes from 3.976 million to 3.850 million in a few seconds from a single bomb

mmmm yeah not a big deal who cares

>>137068134
Obviously never sat in traffic for over an hour in your life.

Go drink more vodka vlad