LONDON NO! Paki still need sexual emergency privilege

Over the course of four trials, 20 young women gave evidence covering a period from 2011 to 2014.

'Racial hostility'

However, some politicians have questioned why their offences were not seen as being racially aggravated in the courts.

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, Mr Buckland said tougher prison sentences should be given when it was established that sexual abuse was racially aggravated.

"The law does not discriminate," he told the newspaper.

"When it talks about sentencing increases for racial aggravation it doesn't cut one way, it cuts all ways.

"Where there is a racial element in sexual abuse cases the law is clear that courts can apply a sentencing uplift.

"Racial aggravation should be front and centre in cases where there is evidence or racial hostility or motivation."

The trials in Newcastle followed a number of similar cases - including in Rotherham and Oxford.

Mr Buckland expressed concern that fears of being accused of racism might have deterred the authorities from adopting a tougher approach.

"There has been an institutional reticence when it comes to Asian gangs that groom and abuse white girls," he said.

"Some people have been more concerned about being labelled racist than dealing with child safeguarding."

'Work together'

Speaking on Wednesday, Home Secretary Amber Rudd said sexual predators were "not restricted to any single ethnic group, religion or community".

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40909065

It will only be deemed "racist" if white people are doing it to non-whites.

the only cure for this is fathers becoming the legitimate head of the household again. deport all the Pakis you want, you'll still have adolescent girls slutting it up around town while drunk and on drugs. Rotherham and now Newcastle are the fault of western civilisation, and that's what needs to be fixed.

Literal rape gangs are roaming the streets and the governments biggest concern is still the narrative

British police go to hell

>>137035853
Any law regarding this will be written as such that only white offenders (as if) would receive longer sentences. Instead "Asian" gangs would be given shorter, to the point of non-existing, sentences if they claim that their victim was behaving in a "culturally insensitive" way towards them, e.g. not wearing a burka.

No law in the west that takes into account racial bias will ever be used to punish non-whites harshly.

>>137035853

You are fucking up. This should be london yes u retard

>>137036095
>It will only be deemed "racist" if white people are doing it to non-whites.
Sorry but that is a US law. UK law says racism against whites is real now.

File: 1460139783757.jpg (44KB, 480x462px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x462px

>>137040592
>You are fucking up.

>>137043686
>hiding your flag
Coward :^)

File: 1500582619248.png (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>137043927
I use this flag because most Brits here are anti-white retards. Pic related.

(((They))) don't like this thread.

>>137035978
>Asian
They need to stop using that word as a euphemism for muslims.

>>137045535
Triggered Pajeet?

>>137045535
Don't worry. I won't tell anyone you voted Brexit to get rid of the Poles.

Meanwhile all other Britain related threads exist only to make you hate your country.

Never trust the flags. Enemies of Britain everywhere.

>>137036761
>thinks grooming is the same as rape
kill your self, feminist white knight cuck faggot

>>137044332
Supporting the EU is a serious violation of what /pol/ believes. You don't belong here. Off yourself.