Is there a National Libertarianism sort of deal?

>>137030763
You can't be libertarian without borders to protect you from the hordes of savages and communists. Libertarianism is nationalist by nature. A nation refers to a land and its people. Not its government.

File: 1491413310-3.png (952KB, 1262x2094px) Image search: [Google]

952KB, 1262x2094px

read it

>>137031076
It's true. Libertarians are usually cryptoleftists. They may as well by antifa.

File: 1497131661718.png (236KB, 1283x760px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1283x760px

a shorter read

>>137030763
I don't think very many people within the right want a North Korea-esque totalitarian government, even if they claim to be national socialists. The right is pretty nebulous right now; we can worry about ideology later.

File: 1496083422442.png (717KB, 1097x900px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1097x900px

>>137030763
Paleolibertarianism is probably what you had in mind: traditional and with respect to people and culture, and yet all for freedom. These days people just call themselves Right-libertarians instead of the unironic left-libertarians that all get the helicopter.

>>137031076
Well, that definitely puts things into perspective. Saved. Thank you.

Got anymore?

File: 1502353298385.png (677KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1500x1000px

>>137032659
besides >>137031536
this and one more

File: washington.png (99KB, 768x722px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 768x722px

>>137032659
>>137033252
last one

>>137032296
>Paleolibertarianism
Just looked it up. This is exactly what I'm looking for. Love of our values of a civilization and telling people to fuck off because we're full. Thank you.

Wouldn't a "libertarian" form of national socialism just be a capitalistic form of nationalism... or, in other words, fascism?

Yea Libertarians are Nationalists.

We just dont side with the Fascists when they want to bring in Socialism.

But if they are going to stomp some Commie skulls in I will be their Ally.

>>137030763
>national
>libertarian
pick one and only one.

File: 1489063397341.png (2MB, 5000x7500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5000x7500px

>>137031536
yeah the whole open border nonsense are the left-libertarians doing. Nobody really takes that meme seriously in the right side of libertariansm and it's seen in the same strawman light as the whole "muh roads" argument.

Left-libertarians want open borders, right-libertarians want PRIVATE borders where you can be as tribalistic as you want within your own private property. And that means organizing with like-minded individuals to cover entire sides of the country while few lefty enclaves rot in peace (think if Cali gets no federal support, while the rest of the right-minded country has a no-trespassers/get-shot-on-will/survivors-will-be-shot-again policy). God, country (not state!), and community are not forgotten in Right-libertarianism, which is why we're usually mistaken for being far too "privately authoritarian" to most other libertarians.

>>137033566
No. Libertarians support a global free market, which explicitly goes against nationalism, which is protectionist.

File: 198384.jpg (11KB, 171x266px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 171x266px

You are looking for Techno-Commercial NRx: libertarianism plus race realism. Read Nick Land and Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

File: 1495303663732.jpg (44KB, 536x809px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 536x809px

>>137033461
no problem, I highly recommend you read into more Rothbard or even better, Hoppe, since they basically take the best elements of what you feel about and really clarify that down into a consistent platform. Mises and Hayek are top-tier in economics, but ultimately have their own minarchist inclinations and that's ok.

Cheers, always good to see more patriots around

File: 1502212794904.jpg (160KB, 889x960px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 889x960px

>>137033626
thanks, haven't seen that one before, saved

>>137033775
I see no conflicts with Nations and a free market, its called trade.

File: images.jpg (8KB, 198x255px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 198x255px

>>137030763
>the Founding Fathers warned us about.
The Founding Fathers were NatSoc as fuck. They just didn't have the technology.

Remember there is the militant "save Germany" version and then there is the "save and evolve" version.

File: jews founding father ben.jpg (107KB, 600x575px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 600x575px

>>137033789
ahahahahha

jews

no

>>137033775
global trade =/= globalism

It's just trade, not putting foreigners above your fellow man. In fact, you would be getting your homeland cheaper prices and more employment from all the resources now available, more industry and such etc. etc.

File: kNcOHfo.png (271KB, 900x500px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 900x500px

>>137031076

That moron is obviously unfamiliar with uncucked palaeolibertarianism: he (I presume?) is a mindless consumer good begging for physical removal.

>>137033775

Wrong: economic nationalism is protectionist. Ethnic nationalism can be any economic system as long as an ethnic dominance is ensured.

>>137034041

When government was private The Tribe was purged over and over again. Neocameral SovCorps will likely do so well.

>>137030763
See>>137031020

NatSoc and sneks must cooperate for now, as an all-white society is necessary for both of us.
Sneks must recognize that only whites can maintain the ideal of liberty, while NatSocs view the white ethnostate as the goal itself.

>>137035038
You guys are pretty much a cancer on the right.

>>137035311
>NazBol faggot
Go back to /leftypol/.
I'm NatSoc, and all I fucking want is a white country and a farm. Nonwhites and commies can get out or get a bullet.

File: tread.gif (1MB, 560x372px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 560x372px

>>137035471
I tread where I please queer.

File: Join or Die modern day.jpg (381KB, 960x730px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 960x730px

>>137035788
NO. STEP. ON. SNEK. You idiotic LARPer

>>137030763
The gagsden flag was given to the secretary of the navy by its creator to use a as a battle standard on his ship.
Stop associating it with libertarianism.

File: d53.jpg (66KB, 1065x800px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1065x800px

>>137035788

>>137030763
>I agree with the ideas of National Socialism
>I just don't want people to be reliant on the government
>Socialism
AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH
wow you're a fucking idiot.

>>137033775
they want to have the freedom to trade with who ever they want. what's wrong with that?

>>137034041
>Hans-Hermann Hoppe
>Jewish
fuck off man

>>137036437
It was designed in the American revolution, which was a fight for liberty, no? And the phrase "don't tread on me" is perfectly compatible with libertarianism

>>137033406
I'm really impressed by this guys comment. Someone please tell me what's wrong with it, and where I can get more.

>>137030763
Everyone seems more concenered with first principles than minute detail. Defend the borders protect demography secure freedoms. this is easy ground to meet on.