Wait so is North Korea now the good guys according to Liberals?

As soon as Trump took office, of course.

Pretty much.

>Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) said on Friday that North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un was acting "more responsible than" President Donald Trump.

File: 1502309840659.jpg (428KB, 722x571px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 722x571px

>>137008943
DPRK are the bad guys according to Trump and his (((masters)))

Yes. First they look to see what Conservative/republicans like or hate then they choose the opposite.

File: IMG_1996.jpg (57KB, 720x883px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 720x883px

I have a feeling even if NK attacks first teump will be blamed for ww3

>>137008943
If hitler came back to life, took over germany, and started opposing trump... liberals would back him

>>137009177
He'll be blamed no matter what happens. Part of the job.

>>137009067
>>137009038

I mean fuck I don't support a pre-emptive strike against North Korea but shit like this make them look bad. You can hate Trump all you want but Kim Jong-un is a fucking nutjob.

>>137009216
And Britbongs would say (((they))) are behind it.

>>137008943
>who is the /liberalsguy/
anyone who hates the West, God and/or wants to kill Trump

Anything trump dislikes,liberals will like

that's how child works lol,libs have daddy issues.

>>137008943
>Wait so is North Korea now the good guys according to Liberals

Who the fuck has ever implied this? Let alone said it?

North Korea is a shithole and should be China's problem as far as I'm concerned. China has come out and said if NK tries to pull shit with us they're on their fucking own.

You shills can go fuck yourselves if you think getting the US embroiled in a war while we're still reeling from the last one is a good idea. I though you shits were pissy about the oldschool warhawk neocons.

Now you think it's a fucking great idea to wage war with a shithole like NK? Apparently you dumbasses think so good you can double think too.

>>137008943
liberals are mentally ill, so probably.

>>137008943

Look, I'm a staunch Libertarian, and even though I disagree with Kim on his economic policies, I have to respect him for the sheer size of the balls it takes to face down Donald Trump's America with what amounts to a mob of untrained starving chinks and a handful of antiquated 50 year's outdated slav-shit mortars.

>>137009142
You're a very dumb cunt, aren't you?

File: 1502310157424.jpg (439KB, 732x560px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 732x560px

>>137010520
Trump is the dumb cunt if he thinks he is in the right here. If he attacks the DPRK, he is just proving that he is another aggressive neocon just like Bush Jr.

>>137010674
And if he wakes for them to attack first, what does that make him then?

>>137008943
Why do you guys think that blind public threats that happen every year is, like, totally going to lead to the end of the year this time?
>THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT
No it's not. It's really not. These ids habbiding and WW3 and Skyking threads all need to be deleted and banned.

>>137010997
>end of the year
World*
But stop thinking the world's ending because some nutjob is throwing another tantrum.

>>137008943
Yup. They hate America, and white people. Leftist scumbags support anything which hurts America and white people. Even if it hurts themselves. Because they are insane and hateful.

EAST KOREA IS BEST KOREA!

>>137008943
6 million shekels have been deposited to your bank account

>>137010520
>>137010967
you gotta call out Trump when he starts acting like a neocon because the whole press will pat him on the back and give him the good boy points he so desperately craves.
he's not a father figure for you, you fucking cuckolds

>>137008943

They are literal (((communists)))

File: 1502111983429.png (28KB, 838x170px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 838x170px

>>137008943
>Wait so is North Korea now the good guys according to Liberals?

Sounds just like "if you don't support the war, you support Saddam" bullshit.

>>137008943
>Liberals
If Trump was a Democrat, then Libs would be howling for a first-strike.

Nothing new
>Bush is killing iraqi kids!
>You're killing babies in vietnam!

File: 1483904505208.jpg (92KB, 620x412px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 620x412px

>>137011485
Buuuuut it's gonna be different this time anon, it will be over in a few weeks! We will be greeted as liberators. - Some dumb fuck on CSPAN

>>137009430

the issue is they had no daddies

Libs have done shit like this since the late 60's. From spitting on Vietnam Vets that only were over there in the first place because the poor SOB's were drafted and had to go. To Jane Fonda going to Hanoi in North Vietnam to protest the war while the VC ad, and were torturing American POW's. Even back in 2003 they protested.

>>137011608
yep JSOC changed the rules for nuke usage in 2005, they can now be used legally to stop WMD development or deployment

http://zfacts.com/metaPage/lib/zFacts_2005_03_15_Joint_Nuclear_Operations.pdf

>"This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff" "The guidance in this publication is authoritative

>"Responsible security planning requires preparation for threats that are possible, though perhaps unlikely today. The lessons of military history remain clear: unpredictable, irrational conflicts occur. Military forces must prepare to counter weapons and capabilities that exist or will exist in the near term even if no immediate likely scenarios for war are at hand. To maximize deterrence of WMD use, it is essential US forces prepare to use nuclear weapons effectively and that US forces are determined to employ nuclear weapons if necessary to prevent or retaliate against WMD use."

>"The United States will make clear that it reserves the right to respond with overwhelming force – including potentially nuclear weapons – to the use of [weapons of mass destruction] against the United States, our forces abroad, and friends and allies.”

As a centrist the Norks aren't the good guys but neither are the US.

>>137012180
VC were torturing*
Sorry guys, my shoulder has been killing me since I got off work and I'm drinking, therefore the spelling mistakes.

>>137008943

They are according to European media, as far as I can tell. Trump is depicted as the reincarnation of Hitler in every news story. Meanwhile Kim Jong Un is the poor victim.

I wish I was kidding, but our media has given their full support to NorK.

>>137009177
If nothing comes of it he'll be blamed for causing mass panic among the people. If this was Hillary they'd be praising how strong a woman she is for defying such a powerful dictator.

>>137008943
Yes. It's Communism so it's literally paradise. But I won't move there because... I have stuff going on..

>>137012180
>>137012494
Can you tell us some more stories? You seem like you have some, you old fucc.

>>137012775
I'm only 32 leaf. Read history!

>>137012881
What was the media coverage in the U.S. during the handover of Hong Kong back to China?

I'm 23. I lived in Hong Kong at the time but I was too young to be awared. I watch old documentaries and feel sad.

>>137013161
Cool! Weirdly I heard nothing at the time, other than it was handed over, and that was it. The US media kinda glossed over it for the most part.

>>137008943
serious question: if someone threatens to shoot me and I kill him, is that a crime here?

>>137010967
why would NK attack us?

>>137013659
On the drive to school every morning we'd pass the Prince of Wales Building, what was once the sort of garrison/headquarters of the British Marines in Hong Kong. By the time I was going to school it flew the flag of Communist China and was stocked full of PLA.

If you watch the changing of the flags at the ceremony in 1997, you can see the last Governor, Chris Patten, keeping it together until the British flag descends, when he hangs his head in despair.

I'm a Canadian, born to Canadian expatriates. I always wonder what it would have been like to grow up in Hong Kong when it was still part of our empire.

>>137012632
>It's Communism

NK is national socialist

Question lads.

Why are liberals so hell bent that something has to be done in Syria to their government, even if it means arming and working with rebels....

...that we should be itching to go to war against Russia...

Yet the idea of talking tough with a nuclear nation threatening to launch missiles at us, our allies, and our territories is somehow too much?

don't even need to look at the flag when discussion level is good guys vs bad guys.

>>137014464
>NK
*DPRK

>>137014330
That makes me sad as welI. I still wish Hong Kong hadn't been handed over. I believe even if you asked the Chinese that lived there under UK rule, if they could choose, they would still wish that it was a part of the Kingdom. I think they'd agree that their lives were way better back then, compared to how it is today.

>>137015667
More importantly, Hong Kong belonging to the UK would've given them more leverage over China and could help keep them in check so we don't actually see war.

>you're either with me or against me

>>137009142

DPRK will not bow to globalism and all the NWO shit. Of course they're being demonized and targeted.

>>137009317

>Kim Jong-un is a fucking nutjob

The propaganda is working, Herr Goebbels!

File: 1452746897906.png (9KB, 312x312px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 312x312px

>>137013951
>be 56% nigger ameriturd
>constantly flashing his gun's and hanging out with his gang members infront of Kims property
>Kim threatens to shoot niger ameriturd
>nigger ameriturd shoots Kim
>nigger ameriturd dindu nuffin.

>>137009038
This. They'd support war with North Korea in a second if a Democrat was in there. It's just rebellion against Trump. They'd be saying we must free the poor, oppressed and starving North Koreans from the evil fascist dictator even if millions of our own have to die. That's why they gave Obama a pass on Syria. They virtue signal depending on who's running the show.