OK I just made that up but I bet your balls tingled pretty hard there for a moment.
I don't WANT it to happen, but on a scale of wanting it to happen from 0 to 10, I'm definitely not a 0. I bet you aren't either.
Why are we such monsters that the prospect of a small-scale nuclear exchange, with all its horrors, is nonetheless undeniably exciting?
Most of us just gave up on life. I just want to watch other people suffer for my amusement.
>>137006709
why do you speak like we're in a tv show?
so i work pretty close to DC, if a nuke is the air, its mostly likely gonna be targeted at DC im just gonna be vaporized when it hits. im definitely a 0 on this one.
>>137008212
I don't think the Norks' missiles can reach DC yet, and even if they could, it would be a dumb target because the launch would be detected immediately and they would be annihilated before the missile landed - so they would not even be alive to know whether it hit, let alone revel in their spite. Not satisfying. Very unlikely they would do this.
It's actually quite a tossup as to what they'd nuke. I don't think the Norks have the stomach or motive to nuke their brothers and sisters in Seoul. I don't see them blowing their load on Japan or China either. And all the American targets are so far away that they'd never know if it worked.
Maybe there will be no happening after all.l
>I bet your balls tingled pretty hard there for a moment.
Not even remotely. Years of IT'S LE HAPPENING posts have desensitised me to sensationalist nonevents.
>>137008958
I know this feel too well