Are you getting new from the biased side(s) of Media

>slate
>skews liberal

Any honest chart would have slate on the same level as Breitbart.

>>137001703
I've been watching so much porn, the first thing I saw was a bent over woman

>>137001896
To be on the same level as Breitbart and liberal you have to be saying shit like trans-age.

>>137001703
The Wall Street Journal is fucking awesome.
Mildly conservative, but not deniable by libtards

>>137002899
If you are using the word "libtard" or "Drumpft" supporter than you lose all creditability.

>>137001703
>CNN nonbiased

Bait thread.

>>137003088
The reason why they are not biased because they have 2 conservatives on tv.

>>137003067
>Making such an idiotic strawman of an argument
>Not aware of this board's demographics
Go back to watching CNN, faggot, you're clearly conditioned to that standard of content

>>137003067
>Not being able to differentiate between "then" and "than"
Looks like somebody else has lost all credibility as well, dumbass

>>137003479
Lol okay.

>>137003088
Judging from OP's other comments and failure to account for the bias of CNN and the New York Times, in addition to overrating the quality of MSNBC and the Huffington Post,
this is a pretty clear slide thread and OP is possibly using his flag to try to hide the fact that he's a fucking kike.

>>137001703
This chart is gibberish and your model of unbiased versus biased is unusable. Instead of wasting time over purity, worry about connection to reality, balance of guests, rejection of emotional language, time spent on topic, and rejection of anonymous sources. NPR and BBC radio indulges in emotional language, normally only talks to people they agree with, regard anonymous sources as divine revelation, and deal with topics as briefly as possible. Thus on purely non-ideological grounds BBC and NPR are objectively garbage.

>>137003857
Said by the person who read Breitbart.

>>137004118
Not mine.

>>137003857
Not mine and CNN is biased but they aren't regarded as bias because of the reason above. If I am gonna say MSNBC and Huffington Post have a lower quality I would have to say the same thing about Fox News.

>>137004832
But it is objectively true and not just ideological preference that the progressive ones are just awful.