BTFO SHILLS! IT WAS A LEAK: CONFIRMED

File: 1501785609213.jpg (41KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 420x420px

>>136884149
>When the narrative is leaking in the liberal sphere on Berkeley's KPFA
>Flashpoints "It's a leak and why it's not a hack"
https://kpfa.org/player/?audio=265741

>people familiar with the thinking of the NSAs AI

Bump for real thread

His name was Seth Rich.

>>136884285
My liberal family listens to this. I'll be sure to forward this link to redpill them. Kek

File: 101010101010.png (284KB, 539x539px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 539x539px

>>136884492
Saber Rattling Threads are real threads goy.

Bump for Seth Rich

File: 1501370733263.gif (3MB, 359x329px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 359x329px

>>136884786
Of course!

>>136884786
I guess Jews really don't tip. I've been searching for about ten minutes trying to find a Jew tipping his stupid fedora hat.

File: 1501785589649.jpg (147KB, 696x800px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 696x800px

>>136884963

Don't we want the real link as well when we like the news?
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

>There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

>>136885464
>Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

>>136885464
BUT MUH RUSSIANS

File: 1502215430100.jpg (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>>136885597
>tfw Russian narrative blows up in DNC's face

>>136884149
Faux Opinion & Specultion Channel (sans Hannity) lets the "Russian inteference" and "Trump collusion with Russia" statements-as-facts go uncontested countess times a day. They won't even mention this, the Awans, or Judicial Watch's Benghazi email news, but go on & on about muh Russia. Hannity needs a new home so he's not gagged anymore. He's the ONLY one you may have a shot of hearing from about this - IF he's allowed to go that far.

>>136884149
Interesting but I'd like to see the source. Remember people: fact check things that fit your bias because nothing trolls the left more than facts.