What makes a news site credible? Plenty of sites credit their

Pay rents, Salon. U r behind 300k on rent.

>>136881413
>Plenty of sites credit their sources and tell facts

People should really check the sources. A lot of the time a website source is another news organization.

>>136881637
Of course, but what if the cited source had the actual information?

>>136882071
I probably fine with it. I don't think there is a 100% credible news source anymore. I just judge an article on how much factual information vs opinion they push. It's why I believe some of the stuff WAPO post about Trump and Russia, but not all of it.

>>136881413
Nothing makes them credible, that's why they constantly have to tell you "We are the most trusted news" bla bla bla bla. I remember when Cnn began, nobody gave a fuck about it. After a few years of collecting ad revenue, they built up to be the propagandists they are now. All it takes is money. Speaking of money that fat greasy roach cenk just got a fat check, someone should be nice and fleece him of some shekels.

>>136882354
>I don't think there is a 100% credible news source anymore

Well, you're not wrong. I just find it odd that some sites are seen as credible and some are "fake news" when they both present facts and sources.

For instance, Breitbart will cover something like say, a right wing college speaker being forcefully kicked out of his engagement. They will present facts and sources on the matter, but liberals will call it fake news just based on the source.

Right wingers do this too, to some extent, with CNN and places like HuffPo.