Do you believe in the use of violence to achieve political goals?

File: detroit_race_riots.gif (136KB, 640x405px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 640x405px

I've noticed a strong procurement to violence on this board lately when it comes to goal achievement. For awhile I thought it was just an outlier but I've noticed its becoming more mainstream.

I'm starting to worry that if it goes any further the mods might begin cracking down or worse, the party van might come a knockin'. So I got curious as to how much the advocacy of violence on /pol/ is dark humor, how much is try hard teenagers, and how much is just plain fucking real.

So the question is as above. Do YOU personally believe in the use of violence to achieve political goals. If so, do you have any limits or standards as to how far your willing to go? And please try and be honest with yourselves, I know a lot of you my want to respond with "I'd murder nigger babies with a hatchet on the drop of a hat" but please be honest with yourself for the sake of the thread.

My own personal answer? I believe in the use of infrastructural terrorism when faced with oppressive governments or social movements. This is the use of bombings or arson on targets that present low casualty numbers such as power plants, electrical transformers, or railways. Operation should also be carried on at night as to lessen the amount of casualties.