Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: Stop_Discussing_MSM.png (173KB, 1080x576px)
173KB, 1080x576px
You realize there is literally no reason to give a fuck about what CNN/MSNBC/FOX, etc. says, right? Honestly, if you’re on /pol/, there is no way you should be watching or paying attention to any of those networks anyways. Most MSM networks are complete (((leftist shills))), and the ones that do lean to the right (e.g., Fox, HLN, etc.), don’t go far enough right, and in any case, they are totally controlled opposition.
So why the fuck do people here post or talk about MSM? When a MSM network says something that is overtly anti-white or anti-nationalist, they go against what people on /pol/ stand for, so we shouldn’t talk about them. On the other hand, when a MSM network says something that is pro-white or pro-nationalism, they are just trying to ride the wave of Trump’s populism to make money in the process. In either case, to even discuss them on /pol/ only has the result of free advertising for them and giving them more money from increased web traffic. If anyone on /pol/ posts about anything said by the MSM, they are most likely a shill and/or are paid advertisers from that organization.
>>
File: Stop_Discussing_Ecelebs.png (353KB, 1080x576px)
353KB, 1080x576px
Take a deep breath, and realize the stupidity of the argument I just made. Like it or not, hundreds of millions of people watch and get their views from MSM, so it’s ridiculous to completely avoid discussing them or ever trying to influence them. Calling MSM out on its bullshit, which requires /pol/ discussing the MSM, will help viewers see the side of the argument that MSM is not presenting them. Promoting those very limited instances of the MSM doing it right (e.g., in limited cases, Tucker or Hannity) will spread awareness and incentivize that MSM network to similar content in the future.
Now, go through and replace every instance of “MSM” with so-called “e-celebs.” It is ridiculous that some people freak out whenever someone who makes youtube videos is posted on here. The same logic that applies to MSM in the paragraph right before this applies equally to “e-celebs.” In fact, there’s an even stronger argument for caring about “e-celebs” because (1) they are watched primarily by people who have already stepped outside the mainstream political/cultural dialogue, (2) they are watched primarily by people who are younger (who matter more for the future and can be influenced more easily than boomers), and (3) you can actually comment or up/downvote their content, which has a direct influence on the type of content they are incentivized to make in the future.
>>
File: 1502401039832.gif (315KB, 234x159px)
315KB, 234x159px
your daily reminder to sage all shill threads
>>
Nice thread mate :)
>>
>>136871112
This kinda seems like what op is talking about. Just screaming sage/shill without actually taking the time to understand or consider what is being discussed/
>>
>>136871112
This kinda seems like what op is talking about. Just screaming sage/shill without actually taking the time to understand or consider what is being discussed/
>>
>>136872121
>>136872158
Shills detected.
>>
>taking /pol/ seriously
>>
>>136872880
it is serious new fag.
This kinda seems like what op is talking about. Just screaming sage/shill without actually taking the time to understand or consider what is being discussed/
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3