Google Algorithm Shadow Bans on /POL/?

Nigger

>>136855294
autism speaks

>>136855294
I don't use the botnet

>>136855294
i refuse to believe a person can be this retarded. sage

OK' anything constructive. Just wondering if this is happening to anyone else.

Well thanks for the meaningless posts. It appears that I am correct to wonder /POL/ and who really controls it. Sad.

>>136855294
I started using firefox again and I do see more of our guys balancing out the shills

weird

>>136857733
Yea thanks, thats what I'm seeing.

>>136855294
You mean search engine right?

Which ones?

I've been using http://duckduckgo.com

Sometimes I use the Bing android app because that is also a browser.

>>136858263
I switched my browser and search engine

I'm comparing three different search engines now and I get see three different results.

>>136858263
This post is on Opera. I'm comparing to Google engine and the web browser on my phone.

>>136855294
I'll see it's I can get this to work on an old phone https://docs.ubuntu.com/phone/en/devices/installing-ubuntu-for-devices

Thanks /POL/ I think this needs some investigation. If we are being separated from one another we are dis-empowered.

For instance, I can't find this thread anywhere else. I don't know how you responded. You clearly must see this thread on your main page, correct? This thread is moving so slowly I've gotta figure few Anons can see this.

>>136860257
I found this thread on chrome if that's what you're asking

The more I look around the more I realize THIS IS REALLY HAPPENING.

>>136860786
What browser are you using?

>>136860719
Yes it is. I'm going to check Chrome now.

Are you fucking stupid? Google doesn't index threads, 4chan does.

>>136855294
Confirmation bias and shit.

>>136855294
>google algorithms
>on 4chan

>>136860866
I'm using Opera and observing Google and the web browser on my phone. I am about to look at Chrome.

>>136860986
I'm not sure what you mean by that. What I'm asking is do you see the same threads from search engine to search engine? I'm not crying conspiracy yet. I'm just trying to under stand what I'm seeing.

I am also saying that I can not find the thread you are reading and maybe posting to one any other device regardless of the search engine apparently. I began this thread question with Google algorithms but now I see this all over.

Are we being compartmentalized here as well? Worried.

Not that many can see this thread and maybe due to the subject. I am becoming more convinced this IS really happening.

It would mean there is censorship on /POL/ .

>>136863998
Are the threads just out of order?

>>136855294
I know sometimes Google censores the shit out of porn on google images

It might also mean the only people who can see this thread are chosen, maybe even specific observers. Could It be /POL/. Are you actually one person? The thing is it seems to be easily observable and likely verifiable. What going on /POL/. Loosing faith.

how is this fucking thread still up, OP you have autism, alert your carer you're on a naughty site

>>136864844
Maybe. I'm looking deeper. Do threads all ways come out in wild card order? I'm literally having a hard time finding the same threads regardless of the device or the engine I enter from. I still need to look deeper but I seem to be getting completely page each time. I've been looking at responses and fiddling at the same time.

>>136865456
Again not really sure what you mean. Have you actually tried this your self?

>>136866682
You show a basic misunderstanding of how the internet in general works.

It is ignorance on such a level the only conclusion is you are autistic.

>>136855294
There's like 150 active threads at any given time. They die when another thread is created and it is the least recently posted in thread. Google could block search results looking for /pol/ threads, but the browser doesn't literally block threads, don't be dense.

>>136866814
Well a brief explanation would be great, you could really save a sperg like me.

>>136867661
Strategically they got a non jewish man to say it.

What's the matter the lady PR was to jewish?

>>136867220
OK so not Google I did't frame this correctly. All the rest remains for me and I just don't understand why I see such a difference every where I look.

>>136868020
Because threads gradually get pushed back over time, to make room for new threads. Once a thread is pushed past the thread cap, it is either archived or deleted. You can check the archive to usually see like the last 2 weeks worth of deleted threads, otherwise check the catalog.

The order might change because of new threads being made, but old threads don't.

>>136867661
>I'M GONNA SHAME THE RIGHT FOR USING THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SHAME GOOGLE FOR USING THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT
>SELF AWARENESS WHAT IS THAT
>HYPOCRISY NEVER HEARD OF IT
t. Evan McMullin's negro doppelganger

>>136868279 Cool that does help. I'll just dig around a bit. Maybe this will become more clear to me. Thanks.

>>136855294
If I'm not mistaken they are probably just out of order. If you want to check this fast just do this
>find a thread you don't see on the other engine
>refresh both sites and push "Command + F" or "CMD + F"
>This will bring up a dialog box so you can type in words to find the direct thread
>this should confirm whether or not they are out of order or if they are different on the different engines

Alright. Thanks for stopping by. I gotta go do stuff. Later maybe.

>>136869243
Oh Thanks.

Good Idea.>>136869243

>>136855294
no fucking lair bating faggots

>>136869639
I really don't think you tried this. It is weird. It does make me wonder. That does not mean there isn't a good explanation.

>>136870034
i just did and /pol/ came up.

>>136870120
Right, but if you use two different devices at the same time do you get the same results? that is what I'm asking.

Just sayin take a look and I'm out gotta do stuff.