Are women allowed to vote in your idea of society? Why or why not?

>>136846812

SNIFFFFFF

>Are women allowed to vote in your idea of society?
no
>Why or why not?
because look how well that turned out

File: service_guarantees_citizenship-starship-troopers.jpg (180KB, 485x750px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 485x750px

>>136846812
Only citizens get to vote

>>136846812
No. Nobody would be allowed to vote.

>>136846812
>Are women allowed to vote in your idea of society?
NO
>Why or why not?
it wouldn't be a democracy.

yes because they make up 50% of society and i've met and known about women who are smarter than a lot of men.

>>136846812
>Are women allowed to vote in your idea of society?
In my perfect society, """""democracy""""" is recognized for what it really is, so there's no voting.

>>136846812
>as usual asks retarded open ended question as an excuse to post his equally retarded fetish
So what thread is making you feel most threatened shill?

File: 1501951739508.png (110KB, 500x566px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 500x566px

>>136847044
>t. cali fag

>>136846812
No one will vote.

An advanced AI will make all policy decisions based on a constant feed of data and meta data.

>>136846812
>allowed
"Mate" women wouldn't want to vote were it not for shalom sandniggers rinsing their brains.
We cleanse the shalom sandnigger influence on our girls and everything is fine.

in my idea of society, there are no votes.

>>136846812
In my idea of society? Sure, but only the vat grown designer genes super women.

>>136846812
*licks feet*
hmm yes VERY delectable my dear

>>136846812
No.

Why?

Because women make terrible decisions based on emotion, They lack responsible decision making.

I've been thinking, pol
If Italy, Spain, Britain, Portugal, France, Slovenia, Croatia, Romania, Greece, Macedonia, Hungary, and Ireland formed as one county, and formed a huge fuck off army, would you support it?

I'm talking something patriotic here, unlike the EU. You know, something with decent traditional gender roles too. Germany and Scandinavian countries can fuck off with their feminism. Anglos, French, Meds, Huns and south Slavs only

>>136847600
>implying men don't

>>136846812
fuck off, Ahmed

>>136846812
Only married men with children can vote. The basic building block of my society is the family, not the individual, so the man votes for the best interest of his family.

Only if they own land. Also in my ideal society marriage is a purely religious institution so being married to a landowner wouldn't count as owning land.

>>136846812
This >>136846898

Also, democracy is bad in general.
>>136847638
A multiethnic superstate is a bad idea for everyone involved. We'd be much better off cooperating as independent peoples.

>>136846812
No for five reasons
1. Look at how things have turned out since countries gave them the right to vote
2. They almost never study the issues nor care about them. They are more likely to vote based on a candidates looks
3. If they do care about an issue it's something retarded like abortion, not the economy or national security
4. Women are emotional creatures who can't be trusted to make a conscious decision based on logic particularly when the decision is important
5. I don't trust something that bleeds for five days straight and doesn't die.

File: 43343434.png (127KB, 345x337px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 345x337px

>>136847600
Whats up with all these bitter virgins who never interacted with women copy pasting the same sentance?

Sorry, my ideal society doesn't codone slavery

Go live in saudi arabia, faggot

You are the worst poster Nigel. I know it was you earlier who posted that Arabic thread with the Islam flag. You never give a fuck about the subject you post about. You post gross feet so you can talk about your fetish with other fat cunts. You need to be banned.

>>136847834
America is multi ethnic

>>136846812
Only if they are land holders.

File: 645.gif (259KB, 350x622px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 350x622px

>>136846812
>vote.

Way to cuck your society to shit.

No
Women are not capable of rational or logical thinking. They are controlled by their emotions.

>People with a year of service to their country
>Landowners

The only two types of people I can ever think would be allowed to vote in my ideal society.

>>136847102

Look how democracy turned euros to fags, we are good, democracy is a bullshit

>>136847187
FUN FACT: Did you know that the black bull meme only came about because of confusion over which actor was the bull in early cuck porn?

When cuck porn was first produced it was in Eastern Europe. The main problem was audience confusion, sorting out who was the bull and who was the cuck. They tried older bulls and younger bulls but the audience didn't respond well the demographic included both older men and younger men.
They tried a rich cuck-poor bull dynamic but it reeked of the laughable 70's-style porn in which the pool boy or pizza delivery man was the male star. There was even an attempt at signifying bulls with moustaches.
Eventually one production company tried a black actor and suddenly it was very easy to tell who was who. When cuck porn started gaining traction in the American market this worked very well because of their pre-occupation with racial differences.
The rest is history.

>>136846977
this

Ideal society has 3 classes: Civilians (plebs, atheists, dregs, no guns), Citizens(guns, honorable, serves the nation, isn't a dreg) and Mothers, the only female that matters.

>>136848761
Why should mercenaries be allowed to steer the country? If they're really important they'll own property, if not they're just meat shields.

>>136846812
>Are women allowed to vote in your idea of society?
No.
>Why
Cunts aren't people.

>>136847044
But overall women are not as intelligent as men. They fucking watch the Kardashians for fucks sake.

>>136846812
*SNNNNIIIIFFFF*

>>136847958
>t. Female

No. Women are incapable of looking ahead to the dangers their actions will cause. They do not anticipate threat of problems. They live only in the now.

They have no morals or strongly held beliefs. They simply take the form of whatever purpose is presented to them as altruistic. They avoid confrontation, never making a firm hard decision.

>>136849912
sounds like me

>>136846812
Technically, yes, but rather man or woman wouldn't get the vote - simply the "household".

How exactly this would work out is an aside, but idea a state that sufficiently supports male/female reproducing households such that society broadly would seek marriage and children over anything approaching a less/indiscriminate hookup mememe culture.

In this way, women would have a "say", although they personally wouldn't have a vote personally - in a sense, neither would the male.

Think of it like Electoral College. STATES vote, but within the states smaller constituent parts vote as individuals. I think that breakdown is too rapid, if not state -> county, then certainly state -> household. Families weigh their collective interests, and vote together. STATES, in less direct manner, thus weight their interests, and vote together. Difference being it is informal at the household level, if only because 2 parties can not tie break, so someone has to wear the pants. Who is that? Up to the household.

>>136849028
that flag
that answer
no surprise

>>136848119
Yes, and it's been shit.
Don't pretend that whites are equal to niggers. This country was alright back when it was a VOLUNTARY association of different Europeans. And they had to assimilate to the Anglo culture.

>>136846812
If they pass an obligatory test on logics, economics and math required to get voting rights for a decade - why not?

>>136848062
>Sweden

>>136848960
>mercenaries

I meant citizens who have done service to their country for a certain time. Military, even domestic duties such as cleaning, disaster relief, etc. It would be a good way to instill duty and make people believe they have to earn their right to vote. But the landowner route seems more likely to go, it's less messy. Millennials would try their best to block it, as they are hardcore leftists.

Yes in a way, there should be 1 vote per couple.

>>136846977
No, because only citizens get to vote.

>>136846812
Only if they are mothers
>when the sole purpose of your being is fulfilled you get to vote

>>136848849
>t. cuckold porn aficionado
neck urself fagit

>>136846812
One vote per family

>>136846812
No.
They're children.

>>136846812
>voting
>in my ideal society
there has never been something so detrimental to society as suffrage. this goes for men and women.

>>136846812
Stop foot posting you degenerate

In my society there would be a family vote, only married couples, born in my country are to vote. 1 per family, done by the men.

>>136846812
voting would be mandatory for all citizens.

>>136846812
>based footbro
They'd be allowed to vote on the condition of being married or having 1 year stable income.

ONLY WOMAN WITH CHILD CAN VOTE!!!
Final solution

No, a vote should come from a family unit, i.e the man of the house i.e property owning males.

>>136849180
men watch wrestling.

>>136851233
>>136851715
do you even have your own families?

>>136848849
Thanks for the lesson in cuck history, professor

>be into feet and have gf who knows
>she has gross feet and constantly puts them in my face and mouth
>constantly wears sandals and tries to give me feet bjs
>realize this is a shit tier fetish

Now I make masturbation to lactating

>>136846812
No women shouldn't vote, but I support a hereditary oligarchy... So nobody would really vote.

File: jhfff.jpg (10KB, 194x206px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 194x206px

>>136846812
>file deleted
it was the only reason i opened this thread

>>136846812
only if they have either a job, are in school, serve in army or are married and have atleast one child

same rule for men

What was the image?

>>136846812
All people should be able to vote. But women are objects, so no, they can't.

>>136854394

feet