nukes2017

>>136825584
The US would respond by bombing them with conventional explosives, thus triggering a war that would end in the dismantling of Kim Jong Un's regime.

That last part is the reason nothing will happen. Kim never crosses the red line when the US draws one.

>>136825584
show me your flag, leaf

>>136826105
what if he actually fires at Guam?

>>136826252
It would be the same response as the first one I stated.

What are you expecting? We would never nuke them, if that's what you want to hear.

>>136826549
do you think the US has enough morals not to use its nuclear arsenal?

>>136825584
Also remember, we don't even have to respond militarily if the missiles land in international waters

>>136826677
Yes, I do. We could do enough damage to that country with MOABs and other conventional bombs. There is no need to use nukes, especially on a country that small.

>>136826677
There is no morality in war, we use depleted uranium...gtfo here