Red pill me on the differences between whites and negros

>>136808580
>Arent we all humans after all?

No

>>136808815
why?

Races are separated by thousands of years of reproductive isolation. It is a known fact that if you take two groups of any species and put them in different environments at a distance, long enough to not interbreed, there will be selective pressure (natural selection) to weed out bad genes in order to adapt to the said environment.

According to Darwin, even birds that lived on different islands had different kinds of beaks that helped them feed off that specific local islands vegetation. But somehow, despite over 40,000 years of reproductive isolation, every group is equal in every ability. To think these are the same people that push for evolution to be taught in schools when they outright deny reality themselves while mocking creationists.

Leftists don't get offended (and sometimes even outright accept) when a comment is made regarding the superior athletic ability of blacks or their prowess in social situations. They don't have an issue accepting these as having a genetic origin. But even remotely mention that whites might be more intelligent than blacks and suddenly you get called a racist and get told everyone is the same (If antifa doesn't lynch you on the spot).

James Watson, one of the biologists you probably learned about in school (helped discover the structure of DNA and was the Nobel Prize recipient) said this:

In an interview with the Sunday Times in October 2007, Professor Watson is quoted as saying he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”.

He was utterly and completely ridiculed and ostracized by the public and the media. There was never anyone who tried to disprove his claim or do anything other than label him a racist. Makes you wonder how pro-science and open minded leftists are on this.

File: mmh1.png (53KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 256x256px

>arent we all humans

Nope we're all homo sapiens. Our species, like any other, has different sub-species in it.

>>136808580
We have a lot in common, but the differences are important.
One way to know someone is shilling/parroting leftist ideology instead of actually arguing from a position based on science and reason is when they propose that the only difference between races is "the color of their skin".
Whites, blacks and Asians all have many distinct traits. Asians and blacks all have brown hair/eyes. Blacks all have coarse curly hair on their heads. Asians all have straight hair. Asians are much shorter on average. Eye shape, nose shape, mouth shape, skull shape, the shape of the calf muscles, etc all vary between races.
So if there are so many clearly identifiable outward variations between races, wouldn't it make sense that there are some internal variations as well?
And we know this because we see different abilities between the races to do things like metabolize ethanol, we see different rates of certain cancers, we see different proportions of fast twitch/slow twitch muscle fibers, different preference for where the body likes to store fat, etc.
So if the bodies all evolved to be so different, why would it be such a leap to assume the mind also evolved differently? The answer is "it wouldn't" in fact the only reasonable assumption is that there are cognitive and innate behavioral differences that evolved between the races. This should not be a controversial idea.