Study Finds That Men Who Attack Women Online Are, Literally, Losers

>>136781590
Archived https://archive.is/mYmhD

>>136781590
>time magazine
why are you reading trash?

>reaching this hard from a few games of Halo
Into the trash it goes

>>136781590
I respect women online and attack them physically in person.

>low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy

File: prod_4eab53ec-ccc0-4835-82fb-b29a09eae619.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>136781590
Just more white male shaming from the media. White men have given women more rights than any other society and time and time again women have proven that they will throw their men under the bus with the rights we gave them. Arabs, Asians and Indians dont have problems with their women because they know that letting women have rights will undermine their society.

>>136781861
This.

Women who attack men are literally fat feminazis. Literally the same quality of of statement.

File: 1501869997372.jpg (45KB, 500x506px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x506px

>>136781590
>time magazine

at some point you just start treating these shitrags like a random blog posts by retards, because they are

>>136782067
^this
It's to lure them in

File: ab3ffd50ac5b19f7b2eaa73dc87a74b93fc4cce79386ca27f441124ad3fa2bb2.png (315KB, 940x720px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 940x720px

>>136781590
Most "women" online are men with HRT pills and neon colored hair.

most women who attack men are feminists

>>136783354
only in the video game and weeb communities

>>136781590
we have nothing to lose, so we might as well tell the truth about these lunatic overly medicated bitches.

>>136781590


The study's (((leading researchers))) are literally Eastern European Jews.

(((time)))

Maya Rhodan
Jul 21, 2015

>A new study purports to show what we all could have guessed: Men who attack women online are actual losers.

>A pair of researchers examined interactions between players during 163 games of Halo 3 to determine when men were most likely to exhibit sexist, anti-social behavior toward their female peers.

>According to the study, which was recently published in the journal PLOS One, men who were worse players than their peers tended to hurl more nastiness at female gamers. On the other hand, men who knew their way around the console were nicer to male and female players.

>The researchers say the findings support an “evolutionary argument” that low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy.

>“As men often rely on aggression to maintain their dominant social status, the increase in hostility towards a woman by lower-status males may be an attempt to disregard a female’s performance and suppress her disturbance on the hierarchy to retain their social rank,” researchers write.

>The findings also support the growing body of anecdotal and research-based evidence that women face harsh blowback when they enter into and thrive in male-dominated corners of the Internet.

>As the Washington Post points out, however, the study does not offer any solutions on how to solve the issue.

>implying a study establishes fact
kek

>>136781590

Alpha Chads attack women IRL.

so, attacking a woman in person makes them winners then?

>>136784131
With there dicks though

File: 1362357227.gif (1MB, 240x314px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 240x314px

>>136781590
This is the state of the modern press. So confused about who their enemies are, so threatened by any little thing, that they are actually attacking kids play CoD who rage after getting killed.

>>136781590
End sexism. Fuck a loser.

File: ShigSchwing.jpg (63KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1280x720px

>>136781590
>time
>2015
>study looked at 143 games if Halo 3 and looked at when men would attack women
>people losing would attack women more than people winning, therefore all men that attack women are beta losers

Really makes you think

Third time this is posted in two days. Avoid shill threads.

>>136781590
>The researchers say the findings support an “evolutionary argument” that low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy.
what

also lol at evopsych being suddenly okay when it's used against men. stay consistent shitlibs

>>136781622
thanks norbro. good dubbles

>>136781590
this seems to indicate that the losers are the ones who are nicer to women, i.e. the people who are better at video games (the ones who sit at home playing them more and have more practice)

What a stupid article

>>136781590
>played a few rounds of halo with pre-selected losers
>some losers were bigger losers than others
>scientific proof
fuck this im going to bed