Removing Google as a verb.

>>136781288
>What are effective alternatives to stop this phenomenon?
i dont know man, try googling it

>>136781288
whenever you fucker stop calling facial tissues (((Kleenex))) or carbonated drink (((coke))) then we can talk about this
fuck off Bing employee

>>136781288
>Then once the best verb(s) is discovered
We will never know unless we Google it.

>>136781692
Nobody says 'Bing it' or ever will, it doesn't need to be search engine specific. It just simply needs to remove the power Google has gained as being the majority share phrase when being told to research something.

>>136781485
> You still use Google, anon?
Ridicule their support of corporate fascism.

"read several primary sources which you may find by sifting through citations" oh wait thats more work than reading some internet articles on websites that already support your view

>>136781288
When is 4chan going to stop using jewgle captcha tracking?

We are switching the word Google with Nigger. "It's all true my Google, Nigger it.

Google wants it to stop being a verb, idiot. If it falls too far into common usage, the government can rule that the word has outgrown them and anyone is free to use the verb. It happened to Refrigerator brand cooling units.

>>136782919
False, they won that case against them.

>http://ripl.jmls.edu/2017/07/20/a-final-victory-for-google-verb-use-does-not-signify-trademark-genericide/

>>136781288
Jewgle it.

File: 1456072696550.png (11KB, 420x420px)

11KB, 420x420px

>>136781288
Do the same thing we did with Pepe.
Turn google into our next Alt-right (hate symbol).
Make the word google and their logo so toxic that the left turns on it.

>>136783191
The case ruled that the word still referred to Google more often than it didn't, so Google was able to keep it. It will probably be retried again eventually to see if the circumstances have changed. Lego has had to defend their brand name many, many times.

>>136784288
Which could be in how many years and lobbying makes this so unlikely to transpire. Isn't our goal to shrivel their numbers and then give rise to alternatives?

I don't like the idea of banking on something that may or may not happen, opposed to something we may have more control over. With this method if successful, it could lead to others telling someone to use 'this' instead of google and then to not say google it. Then they tell 1 person, they tell 1 person and so on.

>>136784239
Do you have any proposition on how to do this, are you proposing images of beheaded people and google over their faces telling them to silence themselves or what's in mind?

"Educate yourself shitlord"

>>136784966
/pol/ had a shortlived thing a while back where we called black people Googles in hopes that people would turn against the word. It never really took off, but we got some laughs when news outlets reported on it.

>>136781992
I say bing it all the time. I get a kick out of it because no one knows what I mean.. then I explain it and we laugh and t becomes a joke. So now I have my coworkers saying "lets bing it!" And unironically using bing.

>>136781692
no one uses 'coke' as a general term like that

>>136781288 (checked)
>What are effective alternatives to stop this phenomenon?
Call out every faggot you see shilling for it. They should be mocked and made an example of for shilling a company as disgusting as (((Jewgle))). This was a marketing ploy from the early 2000s. End it.

>>136781288
Google usually has the most accurate results. Bing is gay, and Yahoo is only good for porn.

just replace google with nigger?

>"How long do I microwave the egg to hardboil it?"
>"I don't know, did you Nigger™ it?"

>>136781288
"search it" "internet it" "look it up"

>>136785359
>t. yankee

>>136784966
No. We don't want to give the impression that we hate google. We want people to think that we and other bigots identify with google.

Start making memes celebrating nazis and white power and use the google logo to replace the swastika.

Or better yet use google as the new symbol of discrimination against women. Capitalize on the latest controversy, fan the flames. Make it seem like google really does discriminate against women and minorities and the alt-right loves it and praises google for it.

>>136785439

It only worked doing it on the way around.

>>136781288
I already say "search for it online" instead.

Don't use g**gle their captcha service is used on the hatespeech factory of the internet!

>>136781288
I call it Schmoogle

>>136784288
The reason Google isn't a genericized verb is because people only use it to refer to Google.

Nobody says "I googled it on bing" or shit like that.

>>136785431
You make a great point, you need to call them out and shame them whenever someone says 'google it' as they are giving power to a corrupt entity that doesn't believe in freedom of information and sells your private information with regularity.

>>136781288
I have started evaluating myself before I go to sleep based on how many times I used google instead of the alternatives
to be fair most of the time the other search engines are good enough

"Search it", "Look it up", whatever you say
DO NOT SAY
"Google it"

Whenever you hear someone say "Google it" it is your duty to correct them as they are feeding an entity that sells your private information[1] and doesn't believe in freedom of information[2].

[1][2] sources pointing at it occurring, numerous times on a large scale.

Then somewhere on the image showing search engines that do not violate the same wrongs google perpetuates.

----

Rough draft of what I think the image should look like, thanks for the help brainstorming guys.

>>136781288
I don't think this is a real problem. Maybe in some years we will say "just Firefox it" instead of "just Google it"; is that really a problem?

>>136784288
Lego my eggo motherfuckers

>>136781288
There's already a thread for this.
>>136758508
Check the catalog before making duplicate threads.

>>136788947
Nice attempt shill.

This thread covers a completely separate issue at hand compared to that thread. I strongly advise you review both threads and recognize that while they have the same interests, are not the same topic and discussion being held.

>>136785357
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GM4Lt5k24s

I am in tech. We do go out, we do go to bars, have dinner with friends, do physical activity. In fact, we do it in style.
I don't LARP, I don't watch anime or read comics. I do play some online games on my PC, with my wife. I am nearly 50 and me wife is in late 20's, former model now techie. Finncially secure, I own a maserati among 3 other cars. Multiple vacationa a year, dozens of concerts including meeting the talent. I can have tats, wear shorts to the office (which I usually work at home save a day or two I go in for meetings). I can speak freely and curse/swear in meetings. I get all kinds of silly perks like office going to new movie releases or an entire day the whole office goes to volunteer at a food bank. We have a cyclist club for people that cycle into work or do competitive practice at lunch. I don't have set hours. Food regularly paid for, at minimum on wed and Firday. Mandatory 2 trips a year to go to conventions and training (Usually LA/LAs Vegas/New York) - and I get to pick which ones I personally want - all expenses paid (bring wife along). No I'm not a neckbeard and I am not the exception either. When I was single I was never without a date when I wanted

>>136785438
bing is best for porn
t.nofapper

>>136781288
You need to make it a funny insult. Change the meaning to "small dick" or "the act of splashing piss on yourself when you shake off at the urinal."

>>136789668
ever considered writing a blog?

>>136789668
Tldr for cheesy pasta

i always say just "Look online"

>>136781288

"duck it"

>>136781288
crawl it
is so asks, have spoken pasta on web search ready

>>136786419
its called goolag now, grandpa

File: rural and suburban retards.png (385KB, 1920x966px)

385KB, 1920x966px

>>136785780
>t.nobody

>>136788607
yes, it is exactly the problem.
think harder.

>>136790673
>t.cuck

>>136781485
Kek. FPBP.
Removing google as a verb is tottaly out of reach. There's gotta be another way of fighting back against google.

File: 1494865088743.jpg (78KB, 1024x576px)

78KB, 1024x576px

I remember I was giving a presentation at some anime con and someone from the crowd stopped me to coplain thay I used Google as a verb.


>>136781692
>Coke
>not Dr. Pepper

>>136790385
>i always say just "Look online"
this. and laugh at spergs using the name of a brand as verb and call them capitalists if they are commies and SJWs when they are right

>>136781288
The only meaningful attack against Google would be if Russian and/or Chinese search engines became more user friendly.

We have to give our personal data to someone. It's better to split up who receives each part of it.

>>136781288
It doesn't matter.
'Google it' may as well be part of the English language now. It just means search the web for it.
Changing peoples default search engine is key. They can still 'google it' using startpage.
If a normie used my comp they'd be joogle free and wouldn't even know it

>>136792049
This. We need to pressure browsers to actively degoogle as a default as well.

The most promising dev team for this would be Brave. Another would be Firefox, but Mozilla is pretty cucked so you'd have to propose it as a privacy initiative.

I personally think that DuckDuckGo has the most potential to replace google. It's good enough as a search engine and has enough name recognition to viably replace Google as the industry standard. Plus it has the "does not track" you rhetoric already in place so you can poise it as more privacy conscious.

Yandex is another good one. It's Russian and has webmail services like gmail as well. The Russian thing is a downside for most people after all this Russian hacker shit though.

Thoughts? I'd like to hear suggestions.

File: 4531933fb39c9da0f1a701d9b42b7e1d307d5101_hq.jpg (47KB, 850x477px)

47KB, 850x477px

>>136785282
definitely that is a good idea. we could easily make this a thing now, we have momentum and more genius level autism brain power. i would venture into replacing "Jew" with Goog, or Google. the Googles are out to destroy the world. You mean Google? no I mean Jews. replace usage of word Jew with Google, it's run by Jews anyway.

I definitely like the idea of tarnishing the actual name of "Google" that will do wonders. In both exposing the Googles designs, and in destroying Google.

>>136792769
If I read Brave as the (((best))) ever again, I will start using chrome again. Fucking shill devs, shilling their half baked shit

File: sasuke_sketch_by_nathalie08s-d5xen1n.jpg (77KB, 900x674px)

77KB, 900x674px

>>136785357
yea i have switched all over now to Bing only. i was using ddgo, but thats owned by a Goog so have to use Bing. i tried searme but the image search is shit. it only shows 200x200 thumbs, and you have to click into the original to get actual size. thats a bitch.

I think Bing is the choice now. Bing it sounds WAY better and easier than DDGo it. fuck DDgo. Bing it Bitch. lets Bing these (((Googs))) down

File: verb.png (52KB, 1440x1440px)

52KB, 1440x1440px

Rough draft, I'm not the greatest image creator, but suggestions?

In the blank space I intend to add approved search engines and then sources.

>>136781288
They actually don't want people to use the phrase google it or googling. They want people to say Google search.

>>136792769
The nice thing about fox is the ease of transition from chrome. Think of it as a stepping stone.
I feel startpage is the best search. It's privacy focused above all else and it uses joogles results.
The main problem I had when I ditched joogle as a search engine was crappy search results.
Startpage fixes this beautifully.

Guys should also look at weening of joutube.
All your favorite channels are already uploading to 'vidme'. I'm liking it so far.

File: 1502163207961.jpg (90KB, 575x913px)

90KB, 575x913px

>>136793719
Startpage literally has a label right beside the Search box that says "Enhanced by GOOGLE"....this search should NOT be adopted whatsoever imo. it's just Google Light. we want as far away from GOOGLE as we can be. and I read that Bing's owner kills Africans with vaccines or something so. theres that

>>136781288
Book-look it.

>>136793956
yes it uses googles results by proxy, it's currently the best solution

>>136781288
We need a competitive search engine. Hell, I don't even care if it's a search engine company, is there ANY company in the US that has figured out how to get away with the opposite angle of the kind of SJW bullshit firing that all these other companies somehow manage to? Could that even be considered a win, since it's still bullshit firing?

>>136784239
Google = nigger

We did it a few months ago

I propose the word "poo".

>how do I make a fruitcake, anon?
>"I don't know, did you try pooing it?"

File: 106.jpg (3KB, 125x121px)

3KB, 125x121px

>>136794561
>poo
>India
>pooing it

>>136781288
>88
>Noice
Make "bing" the new verb, just because bing is so fucking awful and it will be hilarious.

>>136781288
FUCKDUCKGO IT!

File: man let.png (395KB, 1183x917px)

395KB, 1183x917px

>>136794390
fuck off

>>136794561
boy did you shat out a surprise

To "google" something means to infect it with Marxism and forced diversity. Make sense? I don't think there's an equivalent word except maybe "poz"

>>136781288
"Look it up"

I wish we wouldn't conflate censorship by force with censorship by contract. Governments are fundamentally different from businesses.

File: 1457725525774.png (102KB, 625x626px)

102KB, 625x626px

>>136795483
10/10

>>136795547
>ancap doesn't wholeheartedly agree with a distinction between aggressive policy and voluntary contract

>>136781288
>How do I make Nazi Salutes?
Google it. Maybe find as many negative search results as possible? Although, at this point it may be harder to do since they're already fudging search results.
>I say 'look it up' instead of 'jewgle it'

>>136795838
Better?

>>136790999
This...this isn't too bad.

File: brave.png (82KB, 1226x552px)

82KB, 1226x552px

Friendly reminder that if you're a person who respects their individual privacy and freedom, there is no reason to be using the products created by the botnet that is the Google company.
There is a plethora of options available for you to replace your Google apps that are lighter, faster and better in general, including respect for freedom and privacy.
>search engine?
SearX, DuckDuckGo, Yandex (Soviet Botnet)
>browser?
Brave, IceCat, various Firefox forks, Opera, Lightning for mobile
>email?
Self Host, cock.li, Proton Mail, Hotmail (Still Botnet) Yandex (Soviet Botnet)
>cloud storage?
Syncthing, ownCloud, Nextcloud
app store?
F-Droid, Yalp for Play Store front end
>YouTube?
NewPipe for mobile, not signing in on desktop
>SMS/Hangouts?
XMPP, Signal.
>calendar?
Nextcloud, ownCloud, RadiCAL,
>keep?
NextCloud, keep it in your emails.
>news?
RSS client, Librenews
List of Software you can Self-Host
https://github.com/Kickball/awesome-selfhosted
NextCloud Providers
https://nextcloud.com/providers/
OwnCloud Providers,
https://owncloud.org/providers/
WebMail Comparison
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_webmail_providers

>>136790999
thank you based bimodal doodle bot

File: v3.png (130KB, 1440x1440px)

130KB, 1440x1440px

Near final draft, any revision suggestions

>>136798649
Tasty. I'll repost this when possible after you fix the bottom left.

Maybe put a border around the top half to contain all the empty white space.

>>136796423
You need to add a good mobile browser like Dolphin

File: file.png (592KB, 600x800px)

592KB, 600x800px

>>136781288

>People actually think DuckDuckGo is a good alternative

Next you're gonna tell me GoDaddy is okay?

>>136800001
bing?

>>136800093
What do you approve then.

>>136800163
Every other alternative listed was fine. Shit, even Firefox is better. DuckDuckGo originally advertised on 4chan to be "one of us" like a Jew saying he's one of the goys.

Remove DuckDuckGo from the list and you're fine.

>>136800337
Do you have hard evidence or just speculative evidence.

I just know ddg would be good on there due to it's more known than the others and would be more likely for people to adopt.

File: Front_entrance_to_Axel_Springer_headquarters_in1977_West_Berlin.jpg (189KB, 1280x853px)

189KB, 1280x853px

>>136800596
I had evidence before. Here's some information for Qwant.

>From 2011 to 2014 Qwant acquired a total funding of €3.5 million, part of it a loan. It was aided in its operation by special tax breaks form the French Government. In 2014 it received additional funding, including a €6 million investment from Axel Springer Digital Ventures in return for a 20% stake in the company

Here's the front of Alex Springer office. Notice something?

File: atlanta_creative_digitalbulletin_consumer_duckduckgo_860x586.jpg (220KB, 860x586px)

220KB, 860x586px

>>136800799
The fact that DuckDuckGo openly advertises that they supposedly don't track people like google is fishy enough. It's kind of a Trojan horse tactic.

File: 20690351_477049182675821_4193053233221029299_o.jpg (108KB, 1024x704px)

108KB, 1024x704px

Y-you mad ?

File: maxresdefault (10).jpg (150KB, 1920x1080px)

150KB, 1920x1080px

>>136801082
>2008: DuckDuckGo was founded[15] by Gabriel Weinberg

(((Weinberg)))

>>136781288
bumping an important thread.

File: verb.png (111KB, 1440x1440px)

111KB, 1440x1440px

>>136800799
Final

>>136785810
This is an underrated post. The useful idiots will jump on whatever band wagon they think will allow for the easiest virtue signalling

File: tumblr_lnz2j2SY911qedhpm.gif (441KB, 500x281px)

441KB, 500x281px

>>136801556
brilliant. or dare i say BINGiant

>>136801266
duck duck go has the faggiest logo also. when you see this guys face you cant stomach using it.

>>136781692
Dumpster, velcro, jet ski, insulin.

There are better examples.

>>136801556
I hate to say this, but take Brave off of there until further notice. The founders are very Jewish. On the other hand, they're into educating people about coding and how things work. I'm on the fence about them.

>>136787025
I work on an it helpdesk. They do.

Bing is the default search engine for for our installations of ie10.

>>136781288
nigger it
dindu it
nufin it

File: blur->bitmap method.png (76KB, 1000x1000px)

76KB, 1000x1000px

post OC before I snooze

File: think.png (837KB, 1077x974px)

837KB, 1077x974px

'nother

redefine "Google" to mean "lying", "spying", "gaslighting", "fabricating".

E.g. "Stop googling to me and tell me the truth!".

>>136781288
No. Keep using it. Genericise their trade mark. All people which google they use to google? Tell them you prefer to use bing to google things. If google becomes a term used for all search engines it could make them lose the trademark.

>>136803945
Came up earlier
>>136783191
>>136784966
>>136787025

>>136784239
Pepe the frog was arguably more 'toxic' before /pol/ ever took ownership.

Don't you remember Poo Poo Pee Pee?

File: 0522746259.jpg (356KB, 1200x1800px)

356KB, 1200x1800px

>>136781485
>i dont know man, try googling it
i don't know man, try netsearching it

>>136781288
Replace 'google' with 'habeeb' maybe?

>>136801556
remove Brave from there because not only is the sole point of that browser to make the devs profit out of your usage, but also normal people would never bother installing it

Put Firefox instead. Yeah, I know, SJW and what not but we don't have any better choices since normies did use it once and its also getting better than Chrome with recent versions of Nightly

File: masturbategoogone.png (162KB, 477x434px)

162KB, 477x434px

>>136781288
>there needs to be propaganda

>>136805931
Jokes on google, I jerk off in public so everyone watches me.