Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: photo.jpg (26KB, 900x900px)
26KB, 900x900px
Want to see something suspicious? Go to google images and search "white couple"
Count how many mixed race images you get.
Now search black couple
>>
>open settings
>search engine
>set duckduckgo.com
easy
>>
File: shiet.jpg (97KB, 665x298px)
97KB, 665x298px
>>136766911
>Use bing
>search "white couple"
>see images of interracial lesbians, a gay white couple with a black baby, and many dindus.
This is bad, but i imagine google is worse.
>>
>>136767887
At least on bing they pay you to use it
>>
>OH NO BLACK PEOPLE WTF
Like can you /pol/tards just stop being sooo mad at people just because they are of a different color?
Also, that happens because most webpages with the words "white people" in it have interracial/LGBTQ couples, not because the "SJW" boogiemen is trying to stop you virgins from breeding.
>>
The reason is twofold when it comes to images. First, black and white pair in image is posted as "black and white couple" so the engine hits on the "white couple" string. Second, image posters are using meta tags to game the search engines specifically to get the result you see. It is not actually the search engine itself at fault *in this case*.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2