Stop using science to promote sexism.

By science they mean reality?

>>136765959
>Gizmodo
Gizmodo is gawker.
>"Screed"
Perhaps literally true, but it was a very calmly written memo. Even when he was dropping the red pill on how communism is retarded, immoral, and has failed everywhere it has been tried, he was calm. The memo also never claims that men are better than women. Near to the end here: if science says men are better than women, then men are better than women. Finally, notice the author's portrait is a young woman wearing barely any clothing - so probably not scientifically minded.

File: If only you knew you bad things really are.jpg (41KB, 550x512px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 550x512px

>"The data should be ignored if they hurt people's feelings."

This is honestly the most insidious attribute of the modern left. The antifa riots and the shrieking feminist picketers are all tertiary, it's this complete denial of objective fact, of reality, that bothers me.

The genuinely believe that emotion is greater than rational thought.

File: japanmario.gif (679KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 150x150px

>>136765959
>Science is Sexist so we shouldn't believe it!

Same woman:
>You don't believe in global warming because the conclusion isn't what you'd hoped

>>136765959
>men have always used logic and experiments to prove things about the universe
>it works very well for explaining pretty much everything
>should not be used to explain women because reasons

>>136767815
What a brilliant man. I hope he sent those bombs to the right people.

>>136766088
How do you mesure anxiety with real tools
1-0 for me macho

Last I checked men dominated women for tens of thousands of years and only stopped a few decades ago because they felt like it so there's that. I'm sure there are smarter women than me but I'm definitely smarter than your average women, as is the average man.

>>136765959
Why is it offensive to have scientific proof that women are more emotional than men?
>birth control itself makes women insane.

>>136765959
Yeah, I mean... why don't we just fucking kill ourselves?

FUCK WOMEN. FUCK THEM TILL DEATH

File: 1484722778579.jpg (88KB, 575x575px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 575x575px

>>136765959
If sexism is acknowledging that women are fundamentally different than men, then science COMPELS YOU to be a sexist.

Facts. Can't. Be. Sexist.

Stupid broad....

File: 20170810_021838.png (765KB, 1080x1839px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 1080x1839px

>>136766493
Very well said

Men are only "better" than women because our rampantly capitalist society favors a career and bringing in money to spend over all else. In a theoretical alternate society where nurture and motherhood is deified, having a job could be considered an act of servitude to support a family

It's all a matter of how you frame things, feminists got jewed because having to work and compete with others in the workforce is actually a burden

Are you rednecks so blind you can't see that the science field has been dominated over the years by white, straight, christian males? Of course it's going to be sexist, of course it's going to be racist and of course it's going to be homophobic. Only recently people of color, women and the LGBTQA community have been included and you fucking white assholes are trying to ruin it? Fuck you.

>>136770213
saved

>>136765959
B...but science is real.

>>136771736

im homophobic because of faggots like you

/yourself

>>136765959
>stop denying climate change
>men always using science against us

>>136771736
Ha ha

Tfw you owe everything to whitey, including scientific method, but are too proud to admit it.

>>136771736
I agree Xir we must destroy the heteronormative science community

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNibD14

>>136771736(You)

(You)

>>136765959
10 years ago or so a man named Lawrence Summers was the president of Harvard.
There was a conference to address the fact that men are much more likely to be professors at top educational institutions like Harvard. Top educators from around the country attended.
Summers (who was fairly liberal, and was even a candidate for Obama's federal reserve chief) said that one of the reasons men are more likely to be top professors is that men have a wider IQ distribution. IE, there are more men with very low IQs and more men with very high IQs.
Feminists bitched, some feminist professor from MIT or something who was at the meeting stormed out, and Harvard forced Summers to resign.
Summers was right BTW, there's a lot of evidence that men and women are equal on average but men have a wider distribution, more men at the top and bottom. They still canned him

The president of fucking harvard isn't even allowed to use science to explain gender gaps without losing his job. What hope do the rest of us have?

>>136770507
Shut the fuck up Friedrich Engels.

>>136772621
I actually agree with her. Science must be viewed from all perspectives and the diversity of race/sex/gender/culture is a must when it comes to it. Science, as it currently is, is too ethnocentric

File: IMG_0230.jpg (156KB, 610x396px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 610x396px

>>136765959
>tfw both right and left now deny science

>>136773155
Came here to comment about Larry Summers. I'm pretty liberal and usually don't go along with the /pol/ circle jerks, but Larry proved that even libs aren't safe from this SJW crap. Fired from his job for stating facts. At Harvard of all places

>>136773745
if it is ethnocentric, it's not science. that's pretty much by definition.

File: 1439842756463.jpg (22KB, 308x219px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 308x219px

>>136765959
>harvard
>mit
>back to harvard
>straight to google
>98 percentile at google
>filed to: pseudoscience

File: 1494975694339.jpg (123KB, 720x838px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 720x838px

>>136765959

k i will use rape. thx bro

File: No rape on College campus.jpg (195KB, 829x1017px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 829x1017px

>>136766493
Dude you're right. But you've only touched the surface...........