https://archive.is/tvlqH

>It was argued to me this week that the Google memo failed to constitute hostile behavior because it cited peer-reviewed articles that suggest women have different brains. The well-known scientist who made this comment to me is both a woman and someone who knows quite well that “peer-reviewed” and “correct” are not interchangeable terms. This brings us to the question that many have grappled with this week. It’s 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man’s intellect above a woman’s.

Women can ignore facts in CURRENT YEAR

File: 1498543180294.jpg (37KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 300x300px

>>136761966
>Science is only absolute truth when it serves our interests
This is getting tiresome.

File: 892a7078945cb1595582bf20694ae5d3040ad7f0966524063e6eea8c4772b85e.png (102KB, 1287x1861px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1287x1861px

It gets better. She's a gay nigger jew

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-09 at 5.05.51 PM.png (53KB, 585x203px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 585x203px

Rabbi approved

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-09 at 5.10.21 PM.png (214KB, 584x460px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 584x460px

Literally the only people unironically sharing this are traps and jews

>>136761966
By minorities harmed she just means niggers and poos that cheated to get there.

File: 1498181140726.png (241KB, 748x1036px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 748x1036px

>>136761966
Are we forcing (((them))) to be science deniers now?

File: 1491346683202.jpg (305KB, 992x1104px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 992x1104px

>>136761966
>>136761966
>It’s 2017

>>136764040
They have been that way for a while with the exception of their pseudoscience studies meant to push their narrative.

>>136761966
Here we fucking go lads. It's only a matter of time until they start burning books.

>>136761966

>stein

every fucking time!

>>136764040
hahaha saved

File: 1481083368302.gif (3MB, 414x382px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 414x382px

>>136761966
>>136762198

File: 1498002022099.jpg (47KB, 457x469px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 457x469px

>>136761966
>"TRUMP VOTERS HATE SCIENCE!"
>Harvard grad posts science
>"FIRE HIM! THAT SCIENCE ISN'T REAL!"

What did xhe mean by this?

>>136764060
It was really hard to get past the 2nd word of this screed. It's concentrated ground-up blue pill ready for snorting

>>136761966

psychology is not a "hard" science. It's a social science... not real science. It's subjective and heavily influence by social/cultural bias.

Evolutionary psychology doesn't deal with quantifiable facts.

God damn liberals.

Science is truth and it is fact... when it comes to the hard sciences.

>>136761966
Science is is truth though. Almost to a religious point. The scientific method is literally a step by step process to determine said truth.

I'm only a young man to most people but I've lived long enough to see the Left become the shrill, unreasonable, close-minded science-deniers, instead of the Right.

>>136761966
The internet is a myth.

Known fact.

>>136764341
DESU there are two major branches of "psychology" only one of which bothers to test their theories with field studies, but yeah

>muh science

>>136761966
Honest she is right. """""Scientists""""" are just a bunch of cucks who are getting paid by corperations to say what the corperations want.

File: ifuckinglovescience.jpg (98KB, 1316x1400px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1316x1400px

>>136761966
I fucking love Science!

>>136761966
Sounds exaclty like christians now doesn't it?

>>136761966
psychology doesn't use scientific method

>>136764341
>muh soft vs hard science virtue signalling
Yes we get it you took some physics undergrad courses and you're so much smarter than the dreck taking anthro 101.

However personality psychology is legitimate science, it is rigorous, and you need to sort yourself out.

>>136764341
>Evolutionary psychology doesn't deal with quantifiable facts.

Biohistory. Read it.

>>136764397
science only makes falsifiable predictions on natural matters, it's not truth. i'm just being pedantic, though

>psychology
>science

Well there's the problem

File: 1984_goldstein_book_cover_notebooks-r68cfe19d4ac4477b82d3d6678af45a35_ambg4_8byvr_630 - Copy.jpg (98KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1200x630px

>>136761966
"TRUTH"
truth is a construct

>>136764564
*creationists

>>136764985
which means all of them.

>>136761966
It's our best idea of what's true based on empirical study and the process of conjecture and refutation.

PhD Philosopher of Science

>>136763039
retard, the scientific method can only help you determine was is not true. It's just a process of positing hypothesis, then experimenting to see if it is falsifiable and if so in what way. It's a process of elimination. Science can tell you that the universe is not any younger than 13billion years, but it can't tell you that the universe is 13 billion years old. Scientific facts are nothing but propositions which have yet to be discredited and/or refined.

WTF I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE NOW

Inevitably leftists will become broadly known as anti-science.

>>136764502
Haha, Bazinga!

>>136765308
They have been since Popper showed Marxism to be meaningless pseudoscience

>>136764341

>Science is truth and it is fact... when it comes to the hard sciences.

no it isn't.

Science is a methodology. Virtually all scientific philosophers have pointed out that there is no such thing as truth or facts or objectivity in Science. That is merely the goal, not the result. Science produces data. Sometimes it's good, sometimes it isn't. Hard Science, as you call it, deals with empirical subjects that can be tested repeatedly. Psychology, in any of its forms, is not science. It isn't science b/c you cannot use the scientific method with psychology. You can get consistent results, great results, very important results in psychology, but that doesn't make it science. Nor does it need to be. It's unfortunate OP's article does not address the real issues with this topic, just feminist bullshit.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity/

>wow what the fuck you don't think your country should cripple itself to be more environmentally conscious?
>are you some kind of science denying conspiracy theorist who thinks climate change isn't real at all?

fucking jews man

>>136761966
Fug is this all it takes for liberals to turn on MUH SCIENCE?

>Truth: Holocaust did happen
>Science: Holocaust did not happen
Oy vey

File: 430809-202625.png (288KB, 535x678px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 535x678px

>>136764315
Posted less than 24 hours earlier

>>136765084
Ah the good old pessimistic meta-induction principle.

As an actively researching scientist, it's obvious that science does not equate truth in the philosophical sense.

The rest is garbage, though.

Especially the closing bit

>It’s time to turn the tables on this debate. Rather than leaning in and trying endlessly to prove our humanity and value, people like him should have to prove that our inferiority is the problem. Eliminate structural biases in education, health care, housing, and salaries that favor white men and see if we fail.

How about you do that rather than asking someone else to do it?

>>136762198
>scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man’s intellect above a woman’s
>literally facts and evidence are misogynistic
And this is where the camel's back breaks, im fucking done with this bullshit forever. No more sympathy to Liberal scum.

>>136765482
We track truth through predictive capacity in the empirical sciences. GR is truer than Newtonian Mechanics is truer than Aristotlian Physics. Truth is only approximate due to the uncertainty implicit with inductive reasoning not to mention the problem of perceptions.

We get actual truth in Mathematics since it's not based empirical observation.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-09 at 5.35.59 PM.png (260KB, 659x632px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 659x632px

Man, they're really going for it
http://archive.is/JPNew

>>136763195

>Received the LGBT+ Physicist award

So is that like the Nobel prize but braver?

>>136766067
I think they would mostly just bash them in the head if they got lippy for most of human history.

>SJWs turning on science

Ruh roh.

>>136766024
>We get actual truth in Mathematics since it's not based empirical observation.
All observations are empirical :^)

>>136765765
care to elaborate? I'm not familiar with that concept. A quick google led me to a guy named Laudan but not much depth to the wiki article.

>>136765482
You obviously can have psych theories that have predictive capacity cf it IS science

File: economicmigrants.png (362KB, 536x622px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 536x622px

>>136761966

EVERY FUCKING TIME

>>136761966
Just another Ph'd fucker whos whole life is revolved around cold numbers and calculations, so that when racism pops up they are immediately against it because it is completely foreign to their being. Said example from the piece is a astrophysicist.

File: c58a2a3db9ee522b71b849fd5e248c539dbe4cd789c686c2d283609ca49e3113.png (975KB, 1497x1016px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 1497x1016px

>>136766082

>>136766200

Why do you think deductive proofs (which constitutes mathematics) are based on observation?

>>136764040
Nah they're trying to get us to be science deniers. Hoping to throw us into another dark age.

>/pol/ denies climate change despite overwhelming scientific evidence because daddy Trump says it's a hoax
>A woman on the internet says science is not necessarily truth, /pol/ rushes to point out she's wrong

>>136762198
>that suggest women have different brains.
They do. Men and women have different brains. This is not news. Why would we have the same brains? It makes no sense to claim we would.

>>136766377
I'm not sure what you're asserting? Do you simply perceive the numbers?

>>136766024

you get proof in mathematics, which is different than truth.

truth requires an objective reality to test against and we have no idea how to observe something from that perspective, if it is a perspective.

yes, you can certainly quibble with what I said, but you cannot disagree. For example,

is there a difference between these numbers:

>0.0000000000000000000000000000001
>0.00000000000000000000000000000001

the answer should be yes and no. both are practically 0. its almost irrelevant to make a distinction unless you're working with something that requires that absurd level of precision, but to the normal person or the architect, you aren't really going to ever need to be that precise. but there is a big difference between precision and truth, especially since we don't really know what truth is.

>>136764603
!!!

>>136766206

We've been proved wrong every time before why think we are right now?

PS the pessimistic meta induction fails through the problem of induction a la Hume. It is not a proof!

File: 1397516215858.jpg (153KB, 1773x840px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1773x840px

>>136762198
Also
>leftists have to attack the concepts of peer-review to ignore this Google memo's points
>leftists simultaneously say CLIMATE SCIENCE IS SETTLED, and 93% OF SCIENTISTS AGREE ABOUT SOMETHING SO IT'S TRUE

>>136766548
K

>>136764341
>It's subjective and heavily influence by social/cultural bias.
And then very good statistical models are applied to make its findings reliable, accurate, and trustworthy. It's not all just whims and feelings.

the universities are in very real danger of becoming intellectual wastelands because of 'activists' like this cunt.

posthumanism a guide for the perplexed is a book that touches on a lot of these issues. pretty good read.

>>136766422
>/pol/ denies climate change despite overwhelming scientific evidence
What was average Co2 ppm in past 2 million years?
What is it today?

>>136761966
March for science, w-wait no science is mean.

>>136766227

prediction is not science, i've read this hundreds of times before and it is simply not true. it's so prevalant in "science" that it's often called "Non-Operational Science" but that is a clever attempt to mask the broader demarcation of science.

Either you follow the scientific method to achieve data or you do not. bypassing repeatability by prediction might be great for coming closer to some historical data or series of events, but it should never be conflated with science.

Where is a full copy of the memo?

>>136766548
What a windbag...

>>136762198
wtf just because men and womens brains are different doesnt mean their IQ is lower because of it.

In fact I would say there tend to be more prenatal testosterone anomalies regarding males since they have a lower tipping point of being born on the autism spectrum(more exposure to testosterone), therefor more males tend to have an abnormally higher IQ. I'm not sure the statistics are about IQ in men vs women though.

In the memo he did mention that IQ etc differs among races and genders, but didnt specifically get into it as I assume that leads down the path of race realism which is waaaay too hardcore to send out to sjw at google

>>136766952
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf

>>136766942
This

File: APOCALYPTO (2006) Poster Wallpaper Beyond Horror Design.jpg (2MB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x1024px

The more politicized an area of academia becomes, the less I trust its emerging 'consensus'.

As soon as a science or humanities become political, run back to the old books as quickly as you can, before they're removed from academic circulation forever.

I'm not saying old books always 100% right on (obviously many aren't), but efforts to conceal/replace knowledge should be noticed by everyone.

>>136767071
She's a left wing ideologue in academia. Pathetic.

>>136761966
Liberals love science... unless they are looking at gender difference or racial differences. Or showing that GMOs aren't unhealthy.

>>136765084
>scientific method can only help you determine was is not true.
>It's just a process of positing hypothesis, then experimenting to see if it is falsifiable
>It's a process of elimination
>Scientific facts are nothing but propositions which have yet to be discredited and/or refined
Did you learn that from your Imam at Islamic philosophy class or was it the gender studies course?

>>136766067

I always preferred to use violence. Where my /wifebeaters/ at?

>>136765786
>As an actively researching scientist, it's obvious that science does not equate truth in the philosophical sense.
Can you help me understand... If I do this and it does that, and I do this that causes that every time, then this does that is true.

File: sacred_tits.gif (486KB, 230x306px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 230x306px

>>136761966

Was listening to NPR the other day. They mentioned that Eugenics has been debunked for years. Later that day I looked for evidence of their claim and found absolutely nothing other than ethical objections.
Liberals love science as much as it agrees with their point of view and no further than that.

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE! 97% OF SCIENTISTS AGREE

>>136761966
he's right.. science is just another jewish trick that obscures the true nature and meaning of our experience.

>>136767368
>Was listening to NPR the other day. They mentioned that Eugenics has been debunked for years.
I thought Trump was defunding that leftist propaganda.

>>136764040
The only "science" they believe in is >muh global warming gib carbon credit shekels

>>136766556
Maybe I'm being retarded but I don't understand why Hume's induction problem would disprove "pessimistic meta induction". Doesn't Hume posits a similar thing? That you can never quite prove X is true but that X is LIKELY to be true.

>>136767368
You're cruelty matches that of Stalin and Mao

File: just-so-you-know-the-same-people-who-are-telling-19653697.png (87KB, 500x666px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x666px

Hmmm really gets the ol' noggin joggin

>>136767272
You're extrapolating. You've formed a good pattern but have no way of being 100% sure that the next time you do this it will still do that.

File: 6d6d302e03ff889727863d519896d00c--politics-liberal-neo-liberal.jpg (57KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 640x640px

Wow powerful stuff

>>136766942

Read conjectures and refutations and get back to me kiddo.

Prediction is the demarcation between a theory being a candidate for having some truth in it. Next step test, then corroborate, if it has more empirical content (predictive capacity) than its competitors then you should believe it for now.

This is basic stuff. Are you a philosophy autodidact?

>>136767228
t. brainlet


scientific method
noun
noun: scientific method; plural noun: scientific methods

a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

>>136762198
>PEER-REVIEWED DOESN'T MEAN CORRECT
>How dare you quote the Bell Curve! Don't you know it wasn't PEER-REVIEWED?!

Goddamnit this world is pissing me off so fucking much these days

>>136767572
Not saying that I agree with killing people based on genetic characteristics. Just saying that I've seen no evidence suggesting that selective breeding wouldn't work in human populations. If we could find the genes responsible for intelligence we could start experimenting with altering those particular genes with CRISPR.

File: think screensaver.gif (2MB, 460x259px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 460x259px

>>136767588
>>136767639
damn... that sure got my synapses firing

>>136762198
>WE LOVE SCIENCE
>... unless it disagrees with our political view

>>136767559

Hume says induction can only be argued for by question begging. Meaning there is NO argument for induction.

PMI is induction about theory replacement.

Essentially we have reason to think our theories might be replaced but we don't know they will

>>136767141
she's full on.
and that schnoz. christ.

File: 1489005627638.jpg (164KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 960x720px

>>136761966
Why are you faggots getting butt hurt? Science, just like every other field, can be done with biases. If a scientific study showed that black men are better sex partners than white men, would you accept it as fact or so additional research on the study?

>>136766082

means she got a C in Physics 102

>>136767526
He should defund it. The government finances a left wing propaganda network because it sometimes does biographies on Venezuelan violinists who became refugees.

I listen to it only because other talk radio has commercials every 5 seconds.

File: Chanda Prescod-Weinstein.png (271KB, 451x421px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 451x421px

>>136761966
The (((author))), Chanda Prescod-Weinstein

>>136767639
>liberalism is anchored in science and facts
lmao, Locke's premise for the state of nature is literally the bible

File: 1489659672029.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>136765308

>>136764060
According to scientific evidence, your mom is a whore. (:
T. Black person

>>136768110
damn... the nose really does know

>>136768110
Holy moly
Wowzers

>>136767974

That study wouldnt matter because the quality of a partner in bed does not effect the quality of offspring, which is inherently inferior if not white.

why do people keep saying everything is "debunked" without actually making any efforts to debunk it?

>>136767071
WEW

>>136761966
>Science isn't truth
>But Global Warming is true, 99% of scientists say so!

>>136768110
That nose tho...

>>136761966

Qualitative sciences are poisoned, he's right on that. But science is always and will always be truth. We are no morons.

>>136767071
that fucking nose.

>>136767933
Fair enough a point, I guess. So what you're saying is because PMI has observed that theories get replaced and hypothesizes that the same will happen again, therefore it is begging the question in its testing and thus is wrong? Wouldn't that mean that making any sort of observation and wanting to test it out is an induction fallacy? How can anyone propose an hypothesis if you can't use individual data to formulate one? Sorry lad, it's been a while since I've looked into Hume. I kinda remember the gist of it but it's a bit hazy.

>>136761966
This is what happens is a post absolute moral truth World secularists. If you do not have something beyond the material, then the shadow of consciousness that material casts, becomes the truth above the material itself.

>>136768110
nigger Jews, you lose!

We are better than women. Certain things. And they are better with other things. Beautiful right? The differences, the diversity? Holy fuck. This is so tiring.

File: IMG_3539.jpg (115KB, 960x678px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 960x678px

>>136767368
>Was listening to NPR the other day
They're fake news. Pic related.

>>136766422
what was the study you read that convinced you it was real?

>>136767933
nvm, reading over your comment and I think I get what you mean. It's more a question of degree. You're basically saying that PMI is not inherently wrong, it's just the level of confidence with which it asserts that we can definitely predict future theories WILL be proven wrong.

>>136768844
Yup. All induction is suspect. That's where the claim science isn't true comes from. It is inherently uncertain but it gets at truth. Einstein is truer than newton because Einstein has more empirical content. It predicts more and you can do more with it.

>>136767731
So you're suggesting there's a plausible alternative explanation for why theres a laundry list of criteria different in men and women and it's not due to biology? And I'm assuming you're also the type to look for these unlikely alternative explanations in areas such as:
global warming
evolution
age of the earth

File: deebly.jpg (33KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 600x500px

>>136767071
She's like cancer incarnate.

>>136761966

>Irvine, California

Its slowly making more and more sense.
Kim, if you're reading this, aim here.

File: surprised.png (205KB, 470x248px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 470x248px

>>136767071

>>136767071
Even look at that top image. She's mimicking the halo of light.

>>136769420
No, I say that what we have deduced through proper empirical testing is probably the closest thing we have to truth, but approximation is not "Truth" in and of itself. It's just the best guess/case humanity has made on the subject. Basically what >>136769362 has expressed in much clearer terms than I.

>>136766556
^This

>>136770040
I was just wondering whether you were a shill or pedantic

>>136762198
IT'S
CURRENT
YEAR

File: black hitler .jpg (23KB, 700x420px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 700x420px

>>136768159
Holy shit is that you Black hitler ?

>>136768110
after you beat the rothschilds this is the final boss

WTF is this shit
>This document offers ideas and suggestions for talking about unconscious bias and arming employees with the vocabulary and skills to interrupt situations of unconscious bias
https://rework.withgoogle.com/guides/unbiasing-hold-everyone-accountable/steps/give-your-own-unbiasing-workshop/

>>136767071
Golly gosh I bet she'd be fun in the bedroom, not so much in the kitchen

>>136768110
think of how many refugees you could hide up that nose!

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-09 at 6.22.38 PM.png (109KB, 887x499px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 887x499px

>>136770330

Stardusk is going to be right. This ever-growing cognitive dissonance clusterfuck is going to erupt into a frenzied bloodbath

>>136770040
And this is where probability comes in.

>>136770092
Neither really, I was being a devil's advocate if anything. Naturally people say "truth" when they mean "something we can be certain of 99.99999999% of the time" and when you're talking about astrophysicists, these are the sort of people who think in that assburger sort of way. If we try to be 100% absolutely honest, then we can't say for absolutely sure that we know the sun will rise up tomorrow but we know it's almost a certainty in itself that it will happen we might as well consider it to be a truth.

Women are men are the same, and it's obvious. Women are just unlucky and keep not being born with penises.

File: 1489029640506.gif (4MB, 387x194px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 387x194px

>>136765675
DENIALISM
DENIALISM
DENIALISM

So fucking *glad* I have another ISM! I was wearing all the others out.

File: 1494628696082.gif (900KB, 2970x2400px) Image search: [Google]

900KB, 2970x2400px

>>136765675
>t-trump will stop data!

We just had 8 years of progressive removal of federal crime stats.

>>136761966
>the entire point of the scientific method is to find the absolute truth
wew fucking lad

>>136766422
>Pol is a person

>>136770902
Probability arguments are great for practical matter but when it comes to subjects like the absolute, god or truth then they become shit-tier. That's why fedora-lords like Harris and Hitchens used to get absolutely BTFO and asshurt by any philosopher with a bit of rigor because claiming "I am more likely to be right than you" is not proof of being right at all. It's a false dichotomy.

We should push a campaign promoting women and minorities as martyrs and accept lower pay to have "the moral high ground." If they accept higher pay, they'll end up like "the white male."

200 IQ points Peter Coffin weighs in:
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=6e7JPI9h25Y

>>136767368
If you back down a leftist, who can at times seem to be rational, he/she will almost always claim that if racial differences were widely accepted again, that PoC would be likely Eugenics'd out of the world.

>>136761966
Whenever ideology has usurped reason blood flows liberally.

You've been warned pol. If these people win there will be rivers of blood.

File: chanda+PSC+taiwan.jpg (119KB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1500x844px

>>136768110

>>136771236
unless you are a bayesian

File: weinstein.png (1MB, 1080x932px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x932px

>>136771479

File: weinstein3.jpg (66KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 720x540px

>>136771512

File: weinsteinn.jpg (3MB, 1633x7737px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1633x7737px

>>136771528

>>136771479
Shouldn't the fact that there are more Americans who have been in space than their have been female physics PhDs indicate that men and women don't choose the same careers naturally?

File: white tent.png (1MB, 903x2280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 903x2280px

>>136771546

File: 1497869684393.jpg (116KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1024x768px

>>136761966
But climate change is Science. Don't you believe in Science you troglodytes?

>>136764164
They've already started on that. See YouTube's new policies about right wing content and look at Jewgle's search results.

>>136761966
>“peer-reviewed” and “correct” are not interchangeable terms
I told you niggers. I said the day it happened that this was the mistake. Science is modernist or enlightenment, but these scum are post-modernist so they don't believe in science. But this is what they say, so the question then is, what is an interchangeable term with correct?
>It's "how much do my peers agree with me."

>>136771053
So what happens that day?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (27KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1440x1080px

>>136771528
Are we supposed to believe she is black and not a jew?

apparently she has a linkedin:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/chandaprescodweinstein

>>136771908
Jewish when convenient. Black when not.

>>136771908
transracial

>>136768970
LOL
>we don't want to be called out for our bullshit, its bad when the internet have a memory of what we have said and done

>>136771708
Christ she's so fucking full of herself.

>>136762198
I'd push this bitch off a cliff

>>136771053
That's fucking amazing.

Did they delete it?

>>136771479
anyone know her grades/score? How is it if you take away her affirmative action points?

File: 1475615292844.jpg (97KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 900x600px

>>136761966
>>136764040
The left have always been science deniers. They just convinced people that Science!™ is only about climate change, never about biological race and sex.

Now they're trying to take over the social sciences and life sciences to make them ideologically convergent.

>people like him should have to prove that our inferiority is the problem

A real quote from the end of the article. How can we prove that inferiority is a problem?

File: 164987247.jpg (75KB, 764x706px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 764x706px

>>136767071
>decolonialize everything!!!!!!
>reeeee

File: adriarichards380.jpg (25KB, 380x285px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 380x285px

She's Adria Richards ascended form.

>>136771053
Took me a while

>>136762198
tactical scientific nihilism

>>136766450
all transgenderism relies on that assumption. claiming male and female brains are the same is transphobic.

>>136771528
She looks like a cross between a tree frog, a toucan, and a brillo pad

>>136767071
look at the size of that thing!

File: 1490759136268.png (287KB, 429x445px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 429x445px

>>136772795
what thing?

>>136771479
>affirmative action'd to Ph.D
>hurr, this schooling iz oppresev n raycizt n it is soch bigotry white patriarchy pro-rape anti-female supremacy

>>136772704
no, the scientific real exploration of transgender is related to that, the left says its just about how you feel, they actively try to discredit and fight against any biological evidence because then you can test for trans and their whole platform will crumble

>>136763195
>>136767071
>>136771546

Does she even work in the physics field, or is she a writer?

So she most likely got her brains from her non-black half and encourages black women into STEM, where most of them would fail. Nice. Probably qualified for every affirmative action program that ever existed, too

>>136767071
Wow she's like the final boss in a vidya about SJW takeover of America

What was the name of the Black Mathematician maried to the white guy. Her PHD was copied and pasted from random Wikipedia articles and made no sense whatsoever? It was big deal on /pol/ for a few days.

>>136765084
retard, we throw falsification tests on the hypothesis and assume that what passes the tests is true. Otherwise nothing can ever be assumed to be true and we would be reduced to: false vs uncertain. That's why scientific hypotheses have to be falsifiable, otherwise they are not scientific.
BTW, what we certainly can do is FALSIFY leftist claims, e.g. null hypothesis of IQmen = IQwomen

>>136768970
wow

Didn't Orwell call this the 'memory hole'?

>>136765065
fucking remarkable input doctor. really activated my almonds

File: 11490852788024.png (665KB, 1595x745px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 1595x745px

>>136773203

>>136764341
Evolutionary Psychology is not the "psychology" you're thinking of.

They actually do measurements on brain patterns and DNA tests and shit

>>136773203
>>136773394
Holy shit, this is news to me. Time to search the archives.

>>136774342
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/8924248#p8924248

>>136771908
She's transjew, you bigot. Why do you think a woke WOC can't be kike if she was born in the wrong body?

>>136774474
Jesus christ. This garbage is acceptable now? I went from being amused to being disgusted.

>>136771708
I threw up reading that cancer

File: Al Gore An Incontinent Truth.jpg (61KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x600px

Science if only unquestionable if it furthers progressive political movements.

>>136770317
Thanks for spoiling dark souls 6^000000 faggot

>>136773413
Even behavioral psychology is more zoology and biology than straight up psychology.

>>136762198
Simpsons rightly took the piss
Next:
>Femistry
>Galgebra

>>136774749
you missed this whole shit show. alot was dug up on this. She was basicaly forced through the advisory board after she pitched a fit about misogyn and racism for the SEVEN years she worked on her thesis. Also her husband an actual mathematician did all the work for her.

>>136767000
I believe women's IQ's come in just a slight bit lower than men on average, but they cluster closer around the mean, so there's more really stupid and more really smart men than women. This is average per race (which differs from aboriginal Australian up to Ashkenazi/Asian) and also means that more men are better suited to bottom-tier menial and top-tier professional careers.

>>136767071
Who hires these people?

>>136775393
I'm not sure how I missed this. I guess I'll spend the next few hours raging while reading this. Thanks anon.

>>136772307
>>136773257
They went full retard.

File: fuck.png (586KB, 1220x830px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1220x830px

>>136765675
>>136766067

>>136771908
Her nose is so big, I think it might be a Jew all on its own.
She's black with a Jew attached to her face.

>>136761966
The assertion is that science cannot be trusted because, as the past has shown us, a white patriarchy is able to skew results.

If that is the case with the studies cited by Damore, you need to actually be able to demonstrate where that bias exists, rather than being an omnipresent ephemeral.

>>136763567
Trannies =/= Traps you dumb cunt

File: DG1EdsJXcAABdP5.jpg (31KB, 480x513px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x513px

>>136764040
Yeah it's pretty great

>>136762198
Leftists are hypocrites, this isn't news. They're more than happy to pick and chose which bits of science to believe and it's usually all soft (((science))) bullshit they swallow without question.

>>136766067
Meh, I prefer the "five across the eyes" method myself.

File: 1495915291151.jpg (38KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 400x400px

>>136770040
So in other words: atheists BTFO because science is wrong anyway so it can't disprove God. Checkmate

Excellent video on how Google is manipulating you and why
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrKs_vduiKU

File: 895.jpg (36KB, 600x475px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x475px

>>136761966

Does this work for climate change too?

>>136773394
How would you define a Pfaffian?
There's only so many ways to describe it. She didnt' plagiarize it. Her thesis is probably 100 pages long, the fact wikipedia and her thesis include the three most trivial examples of the Pfaffian isn't so weird.

>>136780528
Do you want to read her fucking thesis? Do you want to read it? Enjoy the rage.
http://www.theliberatedmathematician.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/PiperThesisPostPrint.pdf

File: 1495315366300.png (2MB, 2598x1228px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2598x1228px

>>136780528
>her thesis is probably 100 pages long
>she didnt plagerize it

oh youre in for a treat

http://www.theliberatedmathematician.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/PiperThesisPostPrint.pdf

File: 1502235361088.jpg (83KB, 480x598px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 480x598px

>>136767071
Every single time

>>136771053
Can someone please explain this to me? Pretend I'm a brainlet

File: hehe.png (471KB, 680x453px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 680x453px

>>136780926
nice tranny

>>136780993
Never mind, lol Im retarded

>>136763387

Beyond disgusting.

>>136765084
Yeah this post really made me want to spend billions of tax dollars on generic climate change funding good job

File: 4c3c1adf-4c99-4d0c-b3dd-0d92d9d6dc6a-620x372.jpg (161KB, 860x516px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 860x516px

>>136780716
>>136780730
Oh yeah I remember seeing this on /pol/ a while ago.

It reminds me of Godel Escher Bach or Winning Ways for your Mathematical Plays. Its filled with whimsey but also lots of serious math. John Conway's office at Princeton (where she got her degree) is filled with similar sorts of whimsical stuff, but you'd probably not dogpile on him.

You all are just racist.

t. a mathematics phd student

File: 13585886.jpg (79KB, 1024x852px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x852px

science is real
and so is climate change
libs are humans they love to pervert the shit they love just like you faggots

>>136761966
I think you mean (((Weinstein)))

>>136780730
FFFFFUCK

>>136781465
I'm sure none of his papers are as moronic as the one I just read.

From science agrees too fuck science in three days. Their houses are falling apart. End of the year lefties will go full muslim again.

>>136764040
They've been like this since the sixties, when racial egalitarians and other post modernist and neo Marxists began to infiltrate academia and the media.