I remember last year /pol/ used to say that a vote for Hillary was a vote for WWIII. Now, most /pol/acks seem happy that Trump is willing to start WWIII...
So I don't get it: do you guys are shilling for a thermonuclear war? because, this is not a game, this is fucking serious.
Its all satire
>>136732883
Embrace the cleansing nuclear fire.
>>136732883
Because it really probably won't be WW3 at all.
The conflict with North Korea is arising from nuclear weapons and may involve some going off if it does go hot but it won't be WW3.
>>136732883
Speaking for all of /pol/, we were only ever in it for the chaos. Now the chaos is real. The fire rises.
>believing anything Trump shills say
>>136732883
Lets hope that just a couple of tiny nukes hit the us and a lot of burgers die in the process.
>>136732883
NK will not cause fucking WW3
/pol/ really is thick.
>>136732883
>limited nuclear war with NK
>this is the same as MAD with Russia
>>136733485
/pol/ claiming it's happening is what's preventing it from happening.
>>136732883
The nukes that north Korea have are the equivalent of Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Our MOAB does the same damage without nuclear fallout.
Having said that, the use of another nuclear weapon is overdue. I'm surprised that one hasn't been used in war since ww2.
It's not about trumps willingness to start ww3. It's about his willingness to protect America from a state that teaches it's children to hate america. The problem with north Korea has been around since Bill Clonton. He pushed it to bush, to obama, and now trump is dealing with it
>>136733132
>>136733237
>>136733256
Literally retarded.
>>136733702
/pol/ saves the world again
>>136733702
That's not how Keks work.
>>136732883
Im not defending Trump but Nuclear war with NK is not World War
China and Russia wont stand by them
But yea, many people will die. But i don't see any other solution.
I was hoping China takes care of the Kim dynasty but it's not happening.
>>136734721
Everything was OK before him, the issue here is that Trump can't into international diplomacy.
>>136732883
one eye on the bomby
one eye on the kim
>>136735581
It sounds like you would rather have hillary as commander in chief. Or maybe bernie? Could you even imagine how they would react to a situation like this?
Thank god, I dont have to
>>136732883
>Imminent nuclear warfare
K...keep me posted
norks have less force projection than fucking latvia
>>136736539
hi kelly
>>136733327
>>136733820
>>136734689
>>136734721
>>136735581
>>136736415
These posts are shill bots. They will argue and blabber semi-related nonsense to push this slide thread.
/pol/ is being slid eternally by bots. Enjoy it while it lasts, sage bot threads, report bot threads, BROWSE THE CATALOG
>>136735581
dude relax if NK launches a nuclear warheads the whole world would bomb them them fuck out.
there is no chance in hell Kim would commit suicide when he has it so good going there.
>>136732883
>the US utterly glassing NK is "WWIII"
get out
>>136732883
Can't fucking wait.
Can't fucking wait.
>>136736863
I'm a bot? Fist time I've heard that, faggot.
1 post by this id
>>136732883
>serious business are those nukes
>not the stuff of clowns
>no matter how you step and juke
>as seven-coiler you'll be flushed down
>>136732883
At this point no one cares. It would seem we where fucked either way. Hillary wouldn't have prevented anything. The whole of 4Chan would have "committed Clintoncide" by now.
>>136732883
Kim likes Western hookers, the NBA, movies from Hollywood, and CNN way too much to fuck with that hegemony.
This is all China's doing, stirring the shit and forcing Kim to "pay the toll".
>>136736863
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4lFrk4PbVg
explain this shill?
>>136733820
No, you are retarded. I bet you're a jew too.
>>136732883
>libshits take over and ruin all the cities in America
>based Kim nukes libshit cities
>?????
>profit
Fugg :DD
>>136732883
Hillary wanted war with Russia who has thousands of nukes. North Korea is picking a fight with us, who has exactly one nuke. Its not the same thing.
>>136732883
The glory of Atom must not be infected with h*llary's filth
hail atom
>>136733619
The koala got it right. Sage
>>136732883
North Korea has nuclear weapons
if you believe that then your a faggot
>can't produce aircraft
>can't produce an automobile
>main export is cheap clothing
>cant produce enough food to feed their population
but somehow they have nukes... if they have nukes, then they were given nukes.
repeating digital symbols and nukes starting this month.
The problem here is that it's becoming less about if it's going to happen, but more about when and who ever fires first is the loser.
>>136732883
Because Hillary would have started an UNNECCESARY war with Russia, whereas we MUST do something against NK.
we are the children of KEK. enough said.
>>136732883
Hillary talks to dead people an thinks she is a medium for minerva. That is reason enough to prefer WWIII started by Trump over Hillary.
No one gives a shit about NK. China and Russia want to run a pipeline through NK to SK. It isn't feasible to do under kim jong un. As long as we don't try to occupy NK after we user bunker buster nukes the world community isn't going to fight over it. If clinton was president she would have invaded Syria already to oust assad and both Iran and Russia would have retaliated since they cannot allow Syria to fall.
Supposing wwIII started from the NK shit anway... I would much rather have it start from the emergence of a new power structure such as Trump.
>>136732883
>Now, most /pol/acks seem happy that Trump is willing to start WWIII...
Hes not trying to start a war, he is trying to converse with fat kim in his own hyperbolic language
“Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra.”
>>136732883
I will survive and reproduce fine noshing on radioactive fish in my cozy geothermal plastic bubble. My brilliant strategy of not threatening to annihilate everyone for no good reason worked perfectly!
>dubya dubya 3
>caused by nuking the norks
Yeah, nah.
Even China will probably lend a hand. China are seriously getting annoyed with them.
>>136732883
Conservatives seem to be blind to this threat from what i have observed.
>>136732883
Look, you hair-braiding, flower-smoking, work-shy, peace-nick, november juliet lovin', leftist, transphile, fedora-tipped, shit lord;
As long as the US and Europe suffer a little to regain their souls, and all the Norks, Poo-in-loos, Pajeets, Chinks, Desert Niggers and Kikes get glassed, then the game is won (We can just starve out the African Niggers long-term).
>>136732883
>do you guys are
>thermonuclear
lol
>>136740983
Shaka, when the walls fell
>>136733727
The MOAB has the same blast radius has the bombs used in WWII but apparently the nuclear bombs were 1000 times more powerful. I'm not sure how destructive the blast is on the MOAB.
https://www.inverse.com/article/30306-moab-mother-of-all-bombs-compare-nuclear-atomic-bomb-hiroshima-nagasaki