Was Aristotle right?

>>136708753
Was Karl Marx left?

Indeed

>>136708753
yes. look at niggers and spics in the US (((democracy)))

>>136708753
Yup. Divide and conquer.

+democracy only works when every citizen can vote on every decission. Democracy doesn't work when citizens have to choose their representatives.

Pure democracy is a cancer to civilizations, which is why we're a republic

File: jews-opinions-on-whites.png (125KB, 500x387px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 500x387px

>>136708753
Obviously. Only a racially homogeneous society can be a healthy society.

>>136708753
he just destroyed multi culturalism, base greek childmolester

>>136709102
Go read Socrates views on the failure of Democracy and why representative republics are much better.

sources please

>>136708753

I'm more of a Platonist. Democracy is inherently the worst form of government, although I do agree that it is also one of the least harmful ones when there are few laws made.

>>136708753
No. There were city states with despots and others that were democracies. You can hardly call some of the more despotic city-states multi-ethnic, they were all Greeks and they knew it.

File: 0.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>>136708753

You don't need to keep this opinion based because there are studies of the effects of diversity out there. Aside from the feel good grad student level studies there are real, big studies and they all seem to show slight or major problems with multikulti.

People can only stand a small amount of diversity and past that point your society starts to balkanize. Which is why a white society with two black families works out alright and they integrate, whereas you take in more and you get a ghetto.

Study the demographic map of major cities, "diversity" cities like NY, and you find self-selected segregation. People don't mix in a fine blend, they have hard lines that go straight down blocks with one race on one side and another on the other side.

We end up with a similar problem to women's liberation. What if women choose to go into nursing more anyway. And in fact that is the case, the more liberated societies show a bigger gender discrepancy than less liberated ones (even within the west).

We're constantly clashing with the idealized ideological position of "all people are equal" and finding it not to be true, and not something people do in reality. But the drive to have it be an axiom is so large people refuse any other explanation. If reality doesn't fit the model, we need to keep pressuring reality to conform. More "incentives" to get to magical 50% barriers that reality doesn't want. And once there, what then? Do they expect it to continue on its own? Not to deviate from 50/50?

It's all madness. We've stopped looking for what WORKS in society and focused entirely on some kind of ideal superficial structure we want to exist.

File: brett-matt-furie-niggers.png (168KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 800x450px

>>136708753
Aristotle, like /pol/, is always right

File: why-we-fight-book.png (588KB, 585x893px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 585x893px

>>136709404
Would require a little bit more foundation, mostly just a claim on its face. Probably covered in the passage just prior to that.

>>136708753
oy vey, delete this goy