WW3 when?

>>136694072
SOON ANON. JUST GET PREPARED

CAN SOMEBODY ALREADY NUKE SOMETHING, I WANT A HAPPENING !!!. IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR ? JUST ONE, SMALL EXTINCTIONLEVEL HAPPENING, NOTHING MORE. AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRCCCCCCHHH !!!!!!!!!

Never. Not unless ((())) can profit/benefit from it.

The only reason we haven't had a nuclear war is because ((())) would have centuries of work subverting entire nations and the power and influence that comes from that wiped out. None of their power or influence will be worth anything if America, Europe, and everything else is radioactive ash. Their wealth goes poof, their power becomes meaningless, and they lose everything. This is why there will never be a nuclear war started by a country they control.

The only time they will ever resort to nukes is if they ever come at risk of being exposed globally with the majority of people knowing who ((())) is, what they've done, and have started purging their influence from society again and exiling them like Europeans did in the past. When they're cornered and lost all their power and money, that's when they'll resort to nukes to make it a zero sum game. 'If we can't have it, no one can'.

The only wars you will see are ones in which they can profit from and will not risk their larger power structure or the status quo, like the Iraq/Afghanistan conflicts.

>>136694970
>global cabal that controls everything prevents nuclear war from destroying us all
>implying this is a bad thing
How could anyone be this stupid?

>>136695038
They are only preventing it because nuclear war would wipe them out as well. as I just said, none of their power or influence or wealth matters when every country on earth is reduced to glowing craters. Their total control means nothing when all of what they controlled is gone.

They aren't stopping the nukes from falling because they're benevolent, they're stopping the nukes from falling so they get to remain in power over entire nations from behind the scenes and you get to remain under their boot, prisoner of their influence from the second you are born till the second you die, and the same goes for your children.

>>136695438
>they're not really saving us, it's just a coincidence, they're actually being evil
Even in your insane hypothetical argument you make no sense. You might be actually insane. Get help.

>>136694072
Never.
And certainly not with these irrelevant gooks.
Stop fantasizing.

>>136694072
>globe earth
gtfo jesuit shill

>>136695600
Learn to fucking read, jesus christ.

Globalist cabal, normal day to day:
>owns all the wealth
>owns all the governments
>owns all the people
>is the indisputable ruler of an entire planet, entire nations live and die at their command

Globalist cabal, after nuclear war wipes out everything:
>control of wealth is worthless, global economy no longer exists
>control of governments is worthless, most or all have collapsed, capitals, facilities, and personnel (including your own inside men and bought politicians/lawmakers) likely vaporized in nuclear exchange
>control of people is worthless, most of the population is dead, and those that survive have experienced the mother of all redpills, and will shun everything that they believe led to this outcome, including your subversion and rule (and they would be right to), They will not be controlled and will likely lynch known globalists/accomplices if they ever find them
>is now the indisputable ruler of rubble, ashes, and ruins, reviled by all, has lost everything they worked for

Can you maybe perhaps understand now why it would not be in their interests to allow nukes to be used, and that their aversion to nukes has nothing to do with some common good, but is done for entirely self serving purposes?