>george soros is a cultural marxist >billionaires >supporting

>>136690366
So which are you implying is false?
The fact that he's a billionaire or the fact that he funds far left radicals?

>>136690366
The rich benefit from government

Socialism ensures an economic overlord class that does not necessarily arise in capitalism. A capitalist society can be built on a broad entrepreneurial base; such a thing is literally illegal under socialist governance.
The wealthiest people alive are reliably socialistic because that is the political position which prevents their superior wealth from being eroded by upstart competitors.

Marxism is only meant to set up dictatorship, dummy. Utopia is a dream for the rubes

>>136690366
>marxism
>historically always ended up with 2 classes:
>the rich overlords
>the poor proletariat

>modern capitalism
>many different classes
>competition
>rich don't stay rich if they don't innovate

which one would a stagnating rich person prefer

>>136690366
We mean he's a henchman of the NWO, who uses every social, economical, biological, psychological and political weapon available to further (((their))) agenda.

>>136690366
You're thinking of paleomarxism, this is neomarxism

>>136690366
He funds idiots that will help him to destroy nations and getting richer.

Socially in terms of how liberals and marxists see race, ethnicity, gender, heritage and their views on pretty much everything but economy are identical.

They all see cultures are artificially constructed, all races as equal.. all gender roles to be evil and artificial and so forth..

They both believe in the concept of an "end of history" where soon we will at a utopia like situation where no new philosophies will ever be developed, no new wars will ever be fought, and world peace and a form of one world government will soon be formed.

For liberals like George Soros the endgame is the current capitalist system, for marxists its communism.

>>136690366

The results of their actions only benefit people like him, it only goes to show the value of those movements.

>rich people like socialism
what did retarded people mean by this?

>>136694123
>nobody's posting in my thread so I will bump it with baitposting
what did retarded OPs mean by this?