The black pill of transparasitism

I agree feminism is a glitch, even if it was deliberately caused, but the Soviets set that ball rolling and I'll be clicking off those miles.

I disagree with
>However lamentable it may be 3rd wave feminism is correct in that the number of healthy women in a group is directly correlated with it's survival odds.
We can and will go back to treating women as property if it turns out to be the only solution to social infertility. It's an evil lie that women actually deserve privilege because womb.

File: CN6WfZgU8AAq_aR.jpg (28KB, 400x250px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x250px

A+ shitpost anon-kun! Have a related meme for your troubles

File: quotethewomenssuffragemovementisonlythesmalledgeofthewedgeifweallowwomenwinstonchurchill813467.jpg (91KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 850x400px

>>136647452
Interesting stance, I may be old fashioned (inb4 fedora core) in that I believe that chivalry is not dead but badly wounded. Women's value/virtues are substantive but they are not compatible with politics or much of the workforce and certainly not the military.

I feel More value should be placed on traditional/oral history of ones ancestors and collective experiences.. this is where youths are cheated of their elders wisdom through a laundry list of social media. This has traditionally been a field where women have excelled because there is no country for old men. Be it the disposability of man.. When I am done throw me in the trash, haha.

>>136649208
>Interesting stance
It's the uncomfortable truth. There is no enemy we can simply destroy to make this go away, it's a ghost possessing our loved ones.

>Women's value/virtues are substantive but they are not compatible with politics or much of the workforce and certainly not the military.
I disagree, men have many parallel destructive emotions to neuroticism and self centredness, but are told to keep a lid on it. This is what's missing for women, they're told instead they're perfect.

I sometimes think this is to teach the greater group consciousness of women that consequences are important, but it would be supposing the intent is in some way supernatural. You simply can't make decisions based on supernatural forces.

>I feel More value should be placed on traditional/oral history of ones ancestors and collective experiences..
Postmodernism, the first art movement that women contributed to more than men, deliberately rejects this. Standards are oppressive, at first glance this seems like a collusion with art dealers and music reviewers to keep standards low so the art is reproducible, but actually it's just the personality that this art invites rejecting any criticism. Again, they dodge the consequences and the quality of their work suffers.

The next stage is either neoclassical or digital renaissance, I see philosophers like Stefan Molyneux, who has a deliberate interest in classical philosophers instead of modernist philosophers (like Nietzsche, who annoys Molyneux).

At this stage, there's no turning back, you'll simply be considered uneducated if you're not well read on the classics and claiming to be postmodern or beyond the classics will just seem arrogant.