North Korea: a prediction

File: IMG_1573.jpg (164KB, 388x443px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 388x443px

Bump this shit

t. jidf
North Korea is one of the last countries NOT controlled by Rothschild banks, they are NOT communist, they are ULTRANATIONALIST and closer to Strasserism or National Socialism more than Communism.
KIM is /ourguy/ and anyone that will keep swallowing bluepills may as well be a kike themselves

Here's an article to read:
http://www.38north.org/2017/08/rcarlin080817/
Kim:
"[T]he DPRK would neither put its nukes and ballistic rockets on the table of negotiations in any case nor flinch even an inch from the road of bolstering the nuclear force chosen by itself unless the US hostile policy and nuclear threat to the DPRK are definitely terminated."

>>136642770
>we wouldn't even need nukes to end it

Just like we did in Vietnam amirite

>>136643323
It is projected that the USA can only take out 1% of NK artillery every hour. Seoul(Half of SK's population) would be devastated. NK has the capabilities to prevent US troops stationed in Japan from attacking for a while. Just adding to this

File: fine.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

I'm not worried honestly, with advanced interception missiles in South Korea, Alaska, Japan and here. NK is no threat.

>>136642922
Kek agrees with this guy

>>136642922
>leaf

>>136643832
>argument
oh wait none

File: 1502111983429.png (28KB, 838x170px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 838x170px

Grrrrrr we can't let any sovereign states threaten Israel.

>>136642770
I PREDICT THAT NOTHING WILL HAPPEN

SAGE

>>136643323
Vietnam was different. What happened there was you had air support clear an LZ, a squad(s) were then dropped off, they would then clear the area of any unfriendlies, call it quits, then get back in their choppers and fly away, only for survivors to regroup and do it all over again. What I'm thinking'll happen is it's just a giant push from one end to the other (could we see possible Blitzkrieg tactics?), possible Chinese wall to the north that blocks any form of escape.

>>136643458
Could be a long and brutal fight if what you say is true.

>>136642770
How do you propose that the C-130 carrying the MOAB can reach its target without being shot down as soon as it enters NK airspace?

>>136642922
Sounds pretty good, so why haven't you moved there yet?

>>136644906
They are ultranationalists and ensure racial purity. I'd be put to death if I were to mix with their blood.

>>136643458
Only a small percent of nork arty pieces can actually reach Seoul.

File: 1492611956203.png (939KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

939KB, 1000x1000px

>>136643323
Always a bong not understanding military capabilities, We did not lose the war militarily, we only lost it politically. Also, the norks do not have the backing of anyone like the USSR, so your comment is garbage.

>>136644987
Sterilize yourself and move there
If you can't taint their blood, they won't hate you, roit?

>>136642770
they could carpet down all artillery in minutes.
from the dmz to half way up the country would be
bulgogi

>>136645407
>sterilisation
I don't participate in the extinction of my race.

>>136644987
That's no excuse, you don't need to marry a nork to join their ranks and help spread nationalism. There were niggers that joined the nazis with that in mind in the '40s, I'm sorry but you're worse than literal niggers.

File: Kinetic_drop.jpg (7KB, 258x195px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 258x195px

>>136644635
What if it isn't a C-130 that drops it this time? Shit, it may not even be a MOAB at all that gets dropped, I have no idea. I'm quintessentially just throwin darts at a board blindfolded. Might even be B-2s in the cover of night... but that wouldn't be Trump's style. I'm thinking he wants his Mad Dog to do a drop in broad daylight, for all the world to see.

peep this plan friendos

>install giant fans in south korea
>aim them at north korea
>nuke nk until its a gaping hole in the ground
>turn on fans
>blow fallout into china
yeah

>>136645393
The objective wasn't achieved. Vietnam was a failure. Also China has a stronger economy than the USA

>>136645518
You're alone in this thinking

>>136645600
The nigs in the foreign legion joined to fight for independence and fight against the Soviets, not to live there. I'm not sure if NK allows foreign volunteers, and if they do, I have to learn their dialect of Korean which would take too long before a war starts

>>136645574
1. You're a leaf, I think you should.
2. Marry some french eskimo or whatever and bring her with then

>>136642922
digits confirm

>>136645849
>marry an eskimo
Kill yourself racemixing kike

>>136642922
Which is why every (((news))) outlet is shilling hard against war in Korea.

>>136643458
I always heard that North Korea don't actually have enough munition to fight a long war.
They have a stockpile around 70 days of munition, because they would rather have more guns than ammunition for those guns.

>>136645905
Hey, you're a leaf, you're statistically likely to be either an eskimo, a muslim, or french.
I'm just sayin it like it is.

>>136644466
It was all different because China. When yellow fewer strikes there is no antidote

>>136642770
>C130
>making it to the heart of Pyongyang before the way has been cleared

>>136642922
>a totalitarian dictatorship is redpilled
ok

>>136643458
This. That's why I believe if it comes to it, tactical nukes will be used. Probably B61's dialed back to a low setting. It's about the only way to neutralize the massive amounts of work artillery in a short amount of time.

>>136646422
>democracy is redpilled
off yourself

>>136646351
Once again m8, throwin darts at a board blindfolded. Just making guesses here.

>>136642770
Fuck off Jew. North Korea is one of the prime anti-ZOG countries and an ally of Assad, Iran and Venezuela.

>>136643758

(Literally) based Guam poster if that's not a VPN

>>136646643
Well, good thing 2 of those we're already using Cold War tactics warfare against, and the other is probably going to fall apart in a matter of months.

>>136646449
Go ahead. The DPRK has been nuilding underground infrastructure feverishly since they were bombed into rubble in the early 1950s. B61s might work on the first strike, but there are more artillery pieces below ground than above, and they will be on the surface five minutes after the planes leave. There are reasons for Kim's confidence.

>>136644635
fighter escorts.

>>136642922
this

File: 1475199577675.gif (387KB, 382x379px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 382x379px

>>136646422
a dictatorship trying to keep it's residents from being contaminated by degeneracy plaguing the world is okay in my book.

>>136647101
I wonder if they'll fight as stubbornly as the Japs the Pacific. You might get those underground Norks holding on for as long as it takes.

File: wormwood_cleanses_turpitude.jpg (129KB, 580x740px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 580x740px

M A K E
L O V E,
N O T
W A R

>>136647171
But that would violate the NAP and the norks would take Seoul out.

>>136643458
source this. smart bombs are incredible at taking out arty or better yet an ammo dump. USA will establish air dominance from the moment the war kicks off, and end this thing in a month.

>>136642770
>Thinking you can drop a bomb in NK
Plebe detected

>>136643458
>Seoul(Half of SK's population) would be devastated.
That is a price I am willing to pay.

>>136643323
"we" you keep you pansy people to yourselves...

>>136642922
Best Korea

>>136643458


This is bull.

Still there are several thosand. Obviously what would happen is that the US (and allies) would orechestrate an attack to take out as many as possible at once, with stealth aircraft, stealth missles, space weapons; knocking out command and control, etc, and hope than Patriot/thaad could stop the rest.

After that it would be raining hell on NK to achieve total air superiority, and then it would be over in two weeks.

>>136647783
>That is a price I am willing to pay.
Oy vey.

>>136642770
also maybe we hopefully get to see some sort of crazy black project finally revealed in the coming conflict. one can dream.

>>136645664
kinetic weapons wouldn't be used in this war. They are saving the Rod from God for China
>>136645733
We left Vietnam with a peace treaty, the south couldn't hold their own country. But look at that country now, they are buying weapons and signing trade deals with us. We won the war and we are still winning the long game
>>136647101
you know planes can loiter right? an AC 130 with a refueler close by can stay on target indefinitely, probably pulled off during day light and replaced with a drone. The arty underground are great at fighting morlocks, but they are going to have to pop their heads up some time, then its whack a mole.

File: dart.jpg (25KB, 624x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 624x360px

>>136647722

>>136646643
and not a single one of those "allies" will help him whatsoever. with friends like that huh?

>>136647101
its not like we dont have thousands and thousands of planes. and millions of bombs. not to mention being the largest arial operator on the planet. nah theyll be just fine, especially since we'll only do 1 air mission. not like we can do anymore than 1, i mean who does that right?

C-130 would get raped by AA fire.

You need a B-1 or a B-2 to do it.

Guys what if we take a nation
An ethno-state that doesn't let the jews control it
And then we bomb it and put a McDonalds there and legalize trans marriage

>>136642770
>In all honesty, even if, EVEN IF, North Korea were to launch a nuke on Guam,
What the hell are you talking about? The only one considering first strike is america.

>>136648455
none of that matters, N Korea is a nuclear capable state now that can hit NY, DC and LA
You'd "win" but your entire country will be covered in radiation with millions dead.
It would be the USA's last war.

>>136642922
>>136647326
and they would be fine if they didnt continuously threaten the largest military force on the planet known for doing what it wants, where it wants, when it wants.

>>136648728
not even close.

>retards on /pol/ defending North fucking Korea

Neck yourselves

>>136648816
t. brainlet

>>136648933
What's bad about North Korea?

>>136648620
Then why hasn't it happened yet? I know it takes a while for the military to mobilize, but we've been getting ready for something since Trump set foot in the Oval Office. Call Trump might say dumb things, but he's not stupid. If he's going to do this, he'll let Un try and hit first, since KJU has been rarin to do something.

>>136649167
You could say you've already done the first strike with the sanctions.

>>136649244
Can't deny that, but refusing trade because that guy's an asshole is different than throwing a punch.

Can't they just locate all the NK artillery/ammo dumps/HQs, get enough rockets and bombs near NK and then just bomb the shit out of everything at once if NK tries to do anything

>>136648933
t. jidf

>>136649167
There are two carriers in korean waters but not enough ground troops.

>>136647262
shut up
>go/Y

File: 1502219805108.jpg (428KB, 722x571px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 722x571px

>>136649017

File: 1491878491682.gif (327KB, 834x870px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 834x870px

>>136643758
stay /comfy/ Guam bro? Are you on base, or just a civvie?

File: jidf_shekels.webm (2MB, 636x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 636x360px

>>136647326

>>136648728
>NY
moron
Fucking commie leaf, GTFO