Google employment blacklists -- may be illegal in CA

>>136631353
I really hope kim nukes California

File: 2017-08-08_23-28-03.png (220KB, 621x672px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 621x672px

>>136631353
Here is what might be illegal: sharing such a blacklist with someone who is external to the company, with the explicit intention of denying someone future employment for their political beliefs. Even if this one doesn't meet the threshold of illegality, I'm sure there are other examples that do. This could really help out Damore's legal case if they're being so brazen.

>>136631353
Looks suspiciously like a systemic power structure.

>>136631615
Interesting. I'm gonna do a little looking into the law out of curiosity.

Do you know what Kelly's deal is? Is she still working at Google? Also do you know what her position at google was/is (was she in charge of hiring)?

>>136631615
Also
>some shitlib Google employees

Archive any of these that you see. I'm sure they will all start purging them as soon as any noise starts being made.

File: mike.jpg (27KB, 265x324px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 265x324px

>>136632209
That's what the screenshots are for anon

It does appear the leftists at Google have become so comfortable and arrogant in their belief they have the power to blacklist others and control their future career opportunities that they openly boast about it and thus violate labor law. Hopefully this case marks a cultural change

>>136632510
The point of archiving their shit is because it will give proof that the screenshot isn't photoshopped. Also that bitch blocked me I don't know why probably because i've been blacklisted too by a big tech company

File: blacklist2.jpg (67KB, 930x510px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 930x510px

You've all probably seen this one too (it's all over Twitter) but people aren't talking yet about how this could be against the law. More people need to be talking about this aspect imo.

Any lawyers on the board want to weight in?

>>136631353
have a bump. this is interesting

>>136631353

>Saying the bar is lowered

That's literally what they're fighting for/getting him sacked for

>>136633911
Jesus.

Imagine working with this prolapsed faggot.

>>136633911
This is extremely feminine behavior. Maybe Alex Jones is right about the gay frogs.

>>136632742

Real leftists support universal employment guarantees, these are shitlibs.

>when the left becomes so tolerant that they're intolerant of intolerance

File: ee5271b01704ff9a7f8b024a95425b76.jpg (66KB, 500x453px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 500x453px

>>136631353
have a bump

>>136632047

Kek.

It's so true about leftists and projection.

>>136634312
>Adam Felcher
Made you look

>>136633911
these people are fucking stupid LOL

social justice insanity makes them think they can get away with bragging about violating labor laws

File: 1481341830924.jpg (102KB, 486x960px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 486x960px

bump

>>136633911
Oh and one thing I didn't notice before is the date in that screenshot -- this has been going on for at least two years. Probably much longer from being enabled by lax enforcement during the Obama administration. There should be probable enough cause to subpoena all their internal emails. If they're being this incautious, there's probably all sorts of slimy discriminatory shit they're doing.

File: adamfblahblah.jpg (45KB, 693x431px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 693x431px

>>136633911
These cocksuckers are hiding now that they've been found out. Not so big and bold when people are looking.

Ding ding ding. Bingo.

Damore legal action should be looking at:

(1) Libel and Defamation claims (against individual Google employees highlighted in screen caps passing around), AND through doctrine of Respondeat superior (codified in California Labor Code Section 2295), which makes the employer liable for the torts of its employees, apply this to Google itself,

(2) Intentional and/or negligent Interference with Contractual Relations (for all attempts to prevent him from gainful employment post-termination),

(3) MAYBE some NLRB (labor law protection) violation, but since he wasn't making these comments in combination with attempts to organize a Union, he's got uphill battle here.

(4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (vs individual Google employees and Google itself)

(5) Breach of Contract (to the extent he can prove Google policies purport to protect his free speech rights)

>>136631353
That guy should sue google and enjoy the rest of his live as a millionaire

>>136631353
>Google hires people unethically
You don't say.

>>136631491
this

Also, Googlers pls obtain blacklist and leak.

>>136633911

I don't want it to be against the law.

In the U.S. wrongful termination laws do not prohibit you from firing people based on political beliefs.

In this instance, Google has fired an employee for complaining about gender discrimination. This opens the door to fire individuals for promoting feminism or diversity in the workplace.

>>136635229
We're not in a position to be firing anyone though, so it's in our interest for it to be illegal.

>>136634936
ARCHIVE EVERYTHING

>>136633911

Also - suprising this hasn't got him fired. Google has some incredibly lax standards. He's openly saying he will damage the business because of petty office politics.

>>136635014

Since he was talking about NRLB retaliation in his responses to the press, I assume he lawyered up days ago (if not before he wrote the memo). He also seems to have some PR help. Did he hatch the whole plan ahead of time, or did allies swoop in to help him when things got fraught?

>>136634936
Their side of the dialog has vanished from Twitter entirely. If you look at the @google response thread it is uninterrupted ridicule of google. Not one instance of defense. FB, on the otherhand is a nearly 100% Normiestorm os google bootlickers.

>>136634475

Ironically this standard was put to the test when a conservative boss fired a leftist from his workplace.

>>136631491
California would improve a lot if it was an irradiated nuclear wasteland a-la Fallout/Six-String Samurai. No joke California was meant to be a wasteland just ask Tupac.

>>136635229
>This opens the door to fire individuals for promoting feminism or diversity in the workplace.

No it doesn't. Big tech companies are thoroughly infected with globohomo ideology .. it seems to be a feature of any large organizations nowadays, be they public or private. The left EXCELS at infiltrating and subverting existing institutions, boomer CEOs don't know what's hitting them. Making it explicitly legal to fire people for political beliefs would hurt us, not them.

File: 86f0924b6ae4019c7d041bf79b78229c.jpg (15KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 236x236px

>>136631353

Paul Joseph Watson just ripped Google on Youtube. Watch it before it's taken down.

>>136631615
>denying someone future employment for their political beliefs.
political beliefs are only lightly protected by a few places, unlikely to go anywhere.
using or furnishing a blacklist against someone for any reason is what's mostly illegal in CA, it's difficult to enforce unless you're stupid enough to admit it. the goal is to prohibit people from selling lists on the open market I guess

>>136632510
>What is photoshop
Fucking mongoloid

>>136635459
>Did he hatch the whole plan ahead of time, or did allies swoop in to help him when things got fraught?

He's a Jew. I'd bet the farm he did the former.

>>136633911
>pushing people to the edge
>blacklisting from an entire industry
it's like they are asking for a guy to go postal jesus christ

how did we allow these people to be in charge of anything? using emotion to drive decisions that may even impact integrity of a project??? what the fuck man

>>136631353
Is there some place to send tips to the State of California?

File: 1502230484219.jpg (65KB, 465x625px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 465x625px

>>136631353
bump

>>136635229
The issue is the blacklisting of employees that limits or prevents their future employment with other companies. Assuming the CA statute posted above relating to blacklisting is accurate, these Google employees have broadcasted their liability.

>>136635014

The first one is the big bux, in this current climate.

Need to go screencap CNN twitter, unless it's gone already, in which they state he wrote a manifesto labeling women "biologically worthless".

That's straight up libel and defamation.

>>136631353
I guess everyone on /pol/ is fucked.

>>136634936
All I can think is some autistic cunt from here tipped him off.
I really do hate the autistic leftist lurkers, that somehow believe absolute free speech ends when you say something they disagree with.

>>136632510
she was also talking about the list on her twitch stream yesterday. it's still available to be archived.

>>136635459
I think he planned it ahead of time. I've been re-reading the document, and the more I do, the more I think it's a work of genius. It was the perfect mixture of totally innocent "look, here's what the data says" with uncomfortable conclusions, that seems DESIGNED to provoke precisely this shitlib outrage while being completely defensible to normies (and in court). He covered every angle, said nothing the slightest bit rude, and presented it as both a complaint about discriminatory practices (stick), and as a way to help the company (carrot).

Plus we know he put in a complaint with the relevant government authorities before being fired. Maybe not 4D chess, but 4D checkers at least.

>>136635451
THIS screenshot everything
they delete their tweets
@coda deleted some

>>136633911
Little obnoxious cuck isnt so tough now.

File: blacklist_archive_link.png (2KB, 466x50px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 466x50px

archive of the OP tweet thread (which archive services aren't blocked by the board again?)

File: pjw.jpg (90KB, 855x967px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 855x967px

>>136635638
>Paul Joseph Watson just ripped Google on Youtube.

https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=sGBM47Bg3Nc

>>136635969

Yup. Changed.

Still libellous since he never makes that claim.

>>136631491
Can Trump send a team to extract Jay Leno and all his cars before the nuke.
Literally the only valuable thing in California.

Honestly equality is off the table now. There's been too many slights, insults and even violence.

Either SJWs will win or we will. And if we win then woman's suffrage should be repealed.

They had equality and then some but they got greedy, now they're going to lose everything.

>>136631353
Someone should LARP as a lawyer and send her an email of an impending lawsuit with a six figure sum. Would be lulz

>>136636029

Think about it.

This is the ideological extremism they are happy to openly share.

Does anyone doubt leftists within google are currently busily stockpiling data on conservatives to dump in public?

There is going to be a huge doxxing issue in the near future with these sort of ideologically radical individuals working at google.

We've seen it already at the NSA.

This is going to greatly embolden them.

File: DGu4jzcUIAAecoR.jpg (69KB, 566x577px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 566x577px

>>136631353
Of course she posted that fucking stupid xkcd. I can't wait for the day that goon hangs from the streetlights

>>136636839
His cars not Leno himself

>>136635638
IMAHGINE MOI SHAWK

>50% of their work colleagues agree with them
>in an entrenched SJW-infected company
>in one of the most insane, leftist shitholes in the USA
how can these retards delude themselves into thinking they're the majority? they're barely the majority when every possible advantage is stacked in their favor

>>136635719
>how did we allow these people to be in charge of anything? using emotion to drive decisions that may even impact integrity of a project??? what the fuck man

Use what triggers them to destroy them.

Send it to breitbart and Joel Pollak lads

>>136636038
Either that or he was getting slammed in comments and instead of arguing his point, he shut it all down. Most of those screenshots of internal systems at Google where managers are threatening blacklists were published by news sites so everyone that was called out was probably notified by their friends.

>>136631353

Lock them up!

>>136637077
Leno too. Best host.

>>136632047
But only white male heterosexuals have power.

>>136637137
Breitbart is already on it.

>>136637257
Neato

>>136637054

>This applies to google

Too bad all their shilling for "net neutrality" edges them closer to a public utility than a private one.

Shame th CRA exists and specifically overrides a private businesses rights to determine whom it can and can't serve.

>>136635703
>"Th-this is fake! I never said this!"
>5 min phone call, warrant to Twatter
>guilty of lying under oath
>Twatter faces charges for obstruction if they hide evidence

There is literally no way this can end poorly.

>>136631353
what a insufferable cunt

>>136631353
>this cunt's entire fucking twitter
Holy shit, I haven't seen such an evil little cunthair since that blue-haired whale named Randy.

File: 1485569258601.png (243KB, 986x1356px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 986x1356px

>>136637386
>MFW Slack gets dragged in too and rolls over in 0.2 seconds

There's another aspect of this that we need to address, which is pushing back on the normie-conservative kneejerk "they're a private company so they can censor whoever they want". It's an unthinking ideological MUH FREE MARKET response that gets conservatives nowhere, and the left never sticks to it anyway (look at how they still whine about the Hollywood anti-communist blacklists, despite those being done by private entities).

There is in fact precedent for regulating private monopolies so that they respect Constitutional rights: Marsh v Alabama:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

>Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, notwithstanding the fact that the sidewalk where the distribution was taking place was part of a privately owned company town. The Court based its ruling on the provisions of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.

Basically if you have a de facto monopoly and it starts to take on quasi-government roles (which Google and Facebook are certainly doing now -- read Assange for more details on this), then precedent deems them responsible for protecting constitutional rights on their platform. I would love to see this argument made in court, which to my knowledge it hasn't yet.

That, plus the obvious case for antitrust scrutiny, should help us cut these monstrously large tech entities down to size.

>>136637210
His wife is a staunch feminist, and he donates money to feminist majority foundation let the big chinned bastards burn.

>>136631353
lol, she blocked me from her twitter and i didnt even post to hers, just googles

>>136635229
Except that's never going to happen.
You are giving the enemy your knife and begging them to stab you.
Stop being such a little cuck, you have no honor.

>>136631353
has anyone set up a defensefund gofundme sort thing yet?

I will send BTC to anyone who gives me this girl's dox.

>>136637819
that's fucked
poor Jay

>>136638056
dunno but this is relevant
http://www.marchongoogle.com/

>>136638157
#MarchOnGoogle

>>136637772
Oh and there was also a recent case declaring Facebook groups to be public space and thus covered by 1A. It was originally used to prevent some local GOP politician from blocking someone on the page, but this could help our side so much more if it were generalized:

https://arstechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/davisonfacebookruling.pdf

>>136638056
There's a Wesearchr:

https://www.wesearchr.com/bounties/james-damore-official-fundraiser

So who's the guy that wrote the manifesto?

>>136636888
In all honesty, once we've dealt with the enemy within I'm ready to beat the shit out of women until they submit.
There'll be no more voting for them, no more dressing like whores, no more partying in bars getting drunk and no more college.
They'll be making dinners and cleaning the house and I don't give a damn how they will feel about it.

File: images (9).jpg (18KB, 325x452px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 325x452px

>>136638149
Mavis Leno

They don't have kids either, now either that means J couldn't afford them or his wife didnt want to give up her pants and be woman and raise kids.
You decide.

>>136631353
The only solution is start killing Google employees.

File: 1502230066497.jpg (63KB, 568x335px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 568x335px

>>136638472
Harvard engineer with a background in biology

>>136638752
Unfortunate physiognomy ... he should really start lifting

>>136631353
https://www.buzzfeed.com/salvadorhernandez/google-kelly-ellis?utm_term=.xtGxa9oa6#.vhQBAQDA0
Fuck This bitch
Norway Bro Archive Me?

>>136639062
Archived that https://archive.is/TJXxP

>>136639062
"You look amazing in that swimsuit"
This is sexual harassment? WTF is wrong with this person

>>136639130
Thanks!

File: Glick.jpg (99KB, 1030x719px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1030x719px

This is an interesting thread that raises an interesting topic. Where and how is the line drawn between public and private utility and interest. I've always seen the internet as a public utility or space while private companies like Google or Facebook operate as private vendors inside that space. Think of those private companies like food trucks or hot dog stands parked and operating on a public street.

Why is so much of the public hesitant to view internet companies as...companies? If standard oil can be a monopoly then why not Amazon or Google?

>>136636110
From a legal perspective the way he frames it is interesting:
1) he emphasizes discrimination against political views, which is a protected class in california state law
2) the ostensible point of the memo is to discuss diversity policies, and employees are protected from retaliation when discussing employment practices (even if they are wrong)

>>136638149
Final bit on jay and mafia Leno on why they didn't have kids straight from the bitches mouth. Hoped this helped break up the monotony of /pol/ for some light hearted feminist shitposting.

>Mavis answered by telling me about watching “The Honeymooners” as a young girl.

>“I would see a young woman who was very attractive, and a thousand times smarter, and she’s living in this little tenement hovel with her husband, Ralph, and then this Ed Norton, who has an even hotter wife,” Mavis told me. “These men spend all their time talking about what a drag the wives are and asking how can they get away from them. It’s perfectly obvious the women are the ones trapped.”

>“I remember telling my mother when I was 7 or 8 that I was never going to get married or have children,” continued Mavis. “To me, this is the way women get caught.”

>The marriage thing changed when she met the young comedian in the 1970s.

>“He is probably the single kindest human being I ever met,” said Mavis

>>136639062
lol if those things actually happened (they didn't) she'd have a super easy sexual harassment lawsuit. shake them down for a settlement, job done.

File: 6215AC23-81D2-40D8-AC33-7CEF6D837262.jpg (35KB, 720x967px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 720x967px

This is how cults work.

See what Scientologists / Jehovahs Witnessses do to dissenters / "apostates"

>>136634406
>This is extremely feminine behavior
Classic female hostility strategy, social exclusion, text book case.

>>136639062
>company trip to Maui
Stupid bitch didnt realise she was suppose to put out for the privilege of going on such a trip.

>>136639266
damn

>>136636110
this
I hope someone like Thiel funds the lawsuit

>>136639212
I think part of it is that internet companies are more ephemeral by their nature. They flash and fade so quickly that it can be difficult for lawmakers to catch up, and boomers don't understand the technology very well anyway.

I haven't kept up with net neutrality politics for a few years, but I'm willing to bet that the term has been perverted into all sorts of lefty nonsense (MUH TORRENTS etc). It doesn't help that cuckservatives and libertarians are against it for stupid ideological reasons. If rightists put their voices on it, it could morph into something genuinely populist and anti-consolidation, which is the real threat to liberty anyway (either by government or by corporations).

File: 1490663532930.jpg (57KB, 750x242px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 750x242px

>>136638752
>that image
kek

>>136640000
Checked
And your bro
>>136639999

>>136640000
Very well put. Very well put. Especially the portion about threats to liberty coming from public OR private interests. In the US we've always defined liberty as "freedom from..." instead of "freedom to..." I think people are slowly waking up, in the younger generations at least to the reality that a private interest can usurp your liberty or constitutional rights, or at least attempt to do so, as easily as government action.

File: what did they mean by this.jpg (18KB, 451x451px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 451x451px

>>136639229
It's almost too perfect
>write diatribe on leftist political witch hunts
>gets fired for political reasons because of leftists
>insane cunty fuck leftist bitches and uberfags engage in illegal behavior
I want to be happy about this but something seems wrong. Are they that brazenly stupid or are we not seeing something?

>>136638312
.wesearchr.com%2Fbounties%2Fjames-damore-official-fundraiser
that should be posted in the OP of every thread. Actionable items are the most important. though I would prefer a more mainstream site

>>136637772
>the normie-conservative kneejerk "they're a private company so they can censor whoever they want". It's an unthinking ideological MUH FREE MARKET response that gets conservatives nowhere

This your reminder that authentic conservatism is a moral position, not an ideological position. So called "ideological Conservatism" is actually just a rebranding of classical liberalism, and it's proponents are just leftists in right-wing drag. Authentic conservatism is the assertion that your culture, people, and way of life are moral goods worth defending and promoting like any other moral good. For example; the original creed of Superman was an authentically conservative formula. He fought for "truth, justice, and the American way". Truth and justice are moral goods, and "the American way" is given equal status. If you aren't willing to put aside an ideological principle for the sake of preserving your people and way of life, then you aren't actually a conservative.

>>136638752

What's his name?

>>136640448
Right ... another example are banana republics. United Fruit was so rich and powerful that it could bully the weak governments of various Latinamerican states into doing whatever it wanted, to the detriment of the inhabitants. The East India companies are another example.

Past a certain level of gigantism, the distinction between public and private is just a formality. People everywhere miss this: the threat is not governments or corporations, it's the consolidation of power and SCALE in all forms. It isn't a coincidence that the happiest, wealthiest and healthiest society in Europe (Switzerland) is aggressively localist and protectionist, to a degree that can verge on pettiness.

>>136640565
It's not simple stupidity. The left neither values the rule of law nor expects it to be applied to them. They are convinced they are on the side of the angels because they feel righteous, so they can't imagine that there could be negative consequences for what they are doing.

>>136640751
His name is James Damore.

>>136641106

>that nose

Is he a Jew? I don't want him to be a Jew.

>>136640565
It may very well be the attack the leftist needed to kill freedom of speech online I dont know? The whole thing seems a little surreal to me, so much so that I'm actually struggling to follow the nuances of the whole thing. It's too clean cut and I'm probably looking for shit that isn't there. Maybe he was just an employee disillusioned with the whole sjw workplace culture at google, but considering the lengths those cunts go to hiring their people and the amount of i formation they have on everyone can gaurentee he was either setup or a deliberate plant.

>>136640943
(continuing)

Not that anyone still cares, but this episode should conclusively debunk any NRx spergery about how tech corporations will lead us into a glorious future of decentralized libertarianism.

A tech behemoth was so rattled by one minor bland dissident in its own ranks that it had to initiate a witch hunt, with ensuing struggle sessions for everyone else, to restore the peace. If Google was a government, we would call this Maoism, and therein lies the problem: as Google takes over our e-mails, our cars, our news filtering and who knows what else they want to do, they increasingly become just that, a pseudo-government, and not exactly a libertarian one.

A lot of these tech companies matured in an age where hands-off capitalism was seen as the wave of the future and it clearly went to their heads. They think it is incumbent on them to curate the worldviews of their employees (and clearly they're going after the customers as well) and to maintain "a culture", as if a company the size of Google could ever be one monolithic block of true believers.

We complain a lot about governments cracking down on speech, but even comparatively repressive states like Britain or Germany are girl scouts compared to these fanatics. They have the data to issue comprehensive proscription lists and you better believe they would if they could get away with it.

>>136631353
That woman looks pretty, but is uptight as holy fuck! Does she not realize the irony in going around making lists on people? In the 90's people would have called her the Nazi! lmao Sadly now we call her the normie. :/

>>136641564
>NRx spergery about how tech corporations will lead us into a glorious future of decentralized libertarianism
>>136641564
I agree with this, but I thought it was libertarians who said this, not NRx?
Am I confused?

>>136641842
She looks like she might be pretty, but if you look at her closely, she has one of those rings that you're supposed to tie up bulls with stuck through her nose.

>>136641283
lol, yes he's a Jew. You should just enjoy the irony.

>>136641867
>but I thought it was libertarians who said this, not NRx?

Both kinda ... NRx was really only ever just "libertarians mugged by reality" (aka nerds who read the bell curve or pua blogs or something)

>>136641564
Libertarianism is a failed ideology it lead to the rise of EITC and corporate rule in India before the British raj and it will lead as you have said to the rise of these tech giants ruling the western world. With the information they hold we are the closest to a 1984 type scenario than we ever have been.

File: 2070_paradigm_shift.jpg (61KB, 800x445px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x445px

>>136641867
>>136642109
Specifically, Moldbug had these stupid thought experiments about making Jeff Bezos or Steve Jobs into the CEO of America, how it would lead to rational and efficient government.

Funny how all that turned out ...

>>136634475
Typical commie bringing out the
>it's not real _____

>>136639130
Based Nordbot

>>136642036
She is too angry over literal diverse speech, and so I take back my words on her looks.

>>136642058

The irony is there doesn't seem to be any actually intellectual or eloquent thinking whites on our side out there. It's always a Jew like Stephen Miller or something.

>>136642761

I'm trying to find him info on his background, all I can confer is that his name is Italian.

>>136631353
This blacklist collector needs to be dealt with.

>>136637329

We even saw that in the case of the gay wedding cake.

>>136642761
Jews still think you can solve the problem with talking, because Jewish culture has been defined by Rabbinical discourse for 1500 years. Whites are better at seeing long term consequences than Jews, and recognized the problem wasn't going to be resolved via discourse a long time ago. The whites have given up on discourse and are buying guns. Whites have gone quiet, and if you know anything about history that should tell you shit is going to get ugly soon.

I guarantee you there are dozens, if not hundreds of white men at google who could have written what Delamore wrote, but they knew it would get them fired. Instead they decided to make some money at Google, while earning the cache associated with the google brand, and then split after a few years to start their own businesses as "former google engineers".

>>136638503
K...KEEP ME POSTED

>>136641283
He's a jew. And, plagiarizing Jordan Peterson for his manifesto to set things up for a wrongful termination lawsuit was all planned out. Typical jewish innovation. Joogle still needs to burn, though.

File: 1385703872104.jpg (51KB, 531x419px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 531x419px

>>136631491
I'd immediately freeze myself with my medicine stick and set up a better nation 250 years later with an army of one-wheeled robots.

>>136631353
>blocked kek

That bitch has shark eyes. Just nothing there.

Google is seeking a handicapped black transgender schiz.

>>136635614
I hope I become a ghoul so I can make the "watcha looking at smooth skin?"

Has anyone managed to get their hands on any of the blacklists?

>>136644205
err make use of the line I mean

File: 11234509825.png (229KB, 633x1173px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 633x1173px

>>136631353
I think Kelly Ellis is psychotic and extremely emotionally imbalanced.

>>136644534
where do they find the time to do this? nigga do any women actually work there?

>>136637772

It's even simpler than that.

>Muh Private Company

Cool. No more serving faggots, Muslims or niggers.

>>136634406
This

This is typical passive aggressive crazy bitch behavior. Instead of confronting the issue and fight about it they go behind your back

File: Wally.jpg (33KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1280x720px

>>136636110
That's my read on it.
I think he just pulled a
>Pic related
because this was an important and necessary tipping point anyway.

File: 1499230314992.gif (1MB, 446x251px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 446x251px

>>136631353

>>136644844
>nigga do any women actually work there?
Women never do any work in their professions and if they do it's always 1/4th the effort they should put forth

>>136631353

I wonder how much revenue Kelly Ellis brings to Google

>>136644534
Flip through just a few days of her profile, it's easy to see she has intense daddy issues. Been a long time since I've seen such a cartoonishly evil feminist,

>>136645289

If I was a shareholder I'd start feeling spooked right now. How will this look in 2 years? A company you can't boycott because its a multi-industry monopoly. Utility when?

>we thought police now

>>136643645
>Whites have gone quiet, and if you know anything about history that should tell you shit is going to get ugly soon.

you're a fool

nothing is going to get ugly, everyone will continue to do their 9 to 5

if I had a penny for every rightwing collapse prediction

>>136634475
Yeah right, cause you would totally not fire a Trump supporter if you were his boss.

Nevermind, a commie is never going to be anyone's boss...

File: Screenshot_20170808-175306.png (200KB, 1440x1382px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1440x1382px

Don't worry guys, my Google Now is telling me Google did nothing wrong.

>>136645495

The stock didn't react at all today to the news. I guess the market thinks there's nothing to all the alt-lite outrage

>>136634312

If I was coding in environment like this I would be constantly making sure in my code there would be nasty time bombs only I can defuse.
So in case I would be fired for being a damn white male I could leave smiling knowing whoever replaces me would be facing a real mess.

>>136631353
Breitbart article with more quotes from blacklisters:

REVEALED: Google’s Social Justice Warriors Create Wrongthink Blacklists

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/07/revealed-inside-googles-sjw-cabal-blacklists/

>>136645495
>>136644534
She doesn't work for google, she's an e-begger, her friends work for google though.

>>136631353

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/aw/ls/ref=?ie=UTF8&%2AVersion%2A=1&%2Aentries%2A=0&lid=1KCAK824FU63J&ty=

Is anyone the least bit surprised that this worthess cunt is in the market for a keychain pill holder and a bunch of cat furniture?

>>136633911

The amount of polarization and securing oneself in one's own echo chamber here by refusing to even work with someone of other political beliefs is deeply worrying.

File: vancouver-pride.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>136637746
their founder stewart butterfield is a total fucking faggot, he deserves it

File: GOOLAG.png (896KB, 900x1150px) Image search: [Google]

896KB, 900x1150px

meme delivery

>>136644844
> nigga do any women actually work there?
About half.

>>136631353
White men will found their own new tech companies and Google will eventually fail because it will be staffed entirely by pajeets and female 'tech ambassadors'.

>>136638752
Uneducated alt-righter, say no more.

>>136646530
>stewart butterfield
>flickr
>slack
>canadian

As gay as the day is long. Looks like he might be a ginger as well. I could murder him for slack alone.

>>136643898
Lol G-d bless the kikes.

>may be illegal

Why does it matter? What the fuck can the employee can do? Try to sue one of the biggest corporation on Earth?

The CIA could literally walk into satanic sacrificial rituals inside Google's headquarters and they could still buy their way out of it.

>>136631353
Tweet Ted Cruz and the other Senators.

>>136647105
>The CIA could literally walk into satanic sacrificial rituals inside Google's headquarters and they could still buy their way out of it.

implying the CIA aren't the ones supplying them with fresh bodies

Why are ex employees keeping lists of google staff members?

File: Kelly_Ellis_(@justkelly_ok)_Twitter_-_2017-08-08_21.11.27.png (14KB, 583x220px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 583x220px

>>136631353
>feminist, nerd, software engineer • she/her (cis) • #Repeal2A • Twitch: justkelly_ok
>she/her (cis)
Okay, so does that mean she was a dude and is now a post-trans-pansexual woman?
You have an emotionally fucked tech cunt, and then you have the helicopter ticket-holding cuck faggots in pic related.
I just can't even. My eight year-old transable (they, them) asked me if Donald Trump was going to take Google employees to jail. I said we would all protect them.
I am literally shaking with tears it is so hard to type.

Get out the popcorn!

Damore has indeed filed a complaint with the NLRB (See https://nlrb.gov/case/32-CA-203891) and he is represented by Paul Hastings, one of the BIG law firms.

Paul Hastings is a Los Angeles-based law firm. According to the National Law Journal's 2015 NLJ 350 ranking of firms based on size, Paul Hastings has 873 attorneys and is the 37th largest firm in the United States. With $1,056,500,000 in gross revenue in 2015, the firm placed 25th on The American Lawyer's 2016 Am Law 200 ranking. On the 2014 Global 100 survey, Paul Hastings ranked as the 34th highest grossing law firm in the world.

>>136634475
Hey everybody, look at the useful idiot.

>>136648692
Someone gonna file the FOIA request so we can share with the class?

>>136641564
Have a (you) for good posts.

>>136631353

>are saying the bar is lowered for women

They can literally not show up to work because their feefees were hurt by an Anonymous op-ed.

The bar is objectively much lower.

>>136634769
>thinks California will prosecute left-wing crimes

>>136649226
Maybe not, but as a tort, this is probably a lay-up.

>>136640565
The biggest thing that you're missing is that if it goes to court, it'll go to court in California.

>>136649879

It's going to go up to SC. Cap if you want to.

>>136641564
Well done, based bong. Best post I've read today, and absolutely correct.

>>136641564
True Free Marketism has never been tried.

>>136648692
Link is 404

File: 1502111036780.png (365KB, 570x428px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 570x428px

>>136638558

Wouldn't be surprised if it was a for-show marriage and he slams better pussy like no tomorrow

>>136640565
>Are they that brazenly stupid or are we not seeing something?

Based on how they're hiding their social media, I'm guessing they never thought this would make it outside their echo chamber that Damore pointed out.

>>136633911
Am lawyer. Not a califag though

Its not necessarily defamation if they're stating an opinion (i.e. they are "hostile" voices). Opinions cannot be the basis of defamation.

I know california has more employment discrimination protection that most states, I am not sure if political beliefs are included and don't feel like finding out since I'm never going to/practicing in that shitty state. If political beliefs are protected under their employment discrim laws, google broke the law. However, it is worth it for google to pay this guy a settlement versus taking negative press from MSM. Can't buy good press, but you can pay for it to go away.

>>136633911
lawyer here.

best bets for having a claim are either the political pre-screening is tied to a fundamentally protected right, like religion.
i.e. your motive is to discriminate against political beliefs, which is technically legal, but they effect is to ban all conservative christians from the workplace, which is not Constitutional.

The other claim would be good old fashion defamation. If you're impacting someone's chances to be hired by publishing lies, i.e. you're a sexist fascist racist, and there's no claim to back that up its defamation, or slander. I can't remember because my state combined the two years ago so they're the same thing.

This is the problem liberals don't see coming. Outside of the crazy 9th circuit, no one can prove that what the google guy did counts as actual legally recognized racism/discrimination etc.

>>136648692

Probably the plan from the beginning. Good on him.

File: judge fudge.jpg (73KB, 645x561px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 645x561px

>>136631353
>The list will be open to contributions from others, but I personally will be the judge of what is included and what is excluded
>Things I'm still pondering: should inclusion on the list require something like a trial?
jesus christ this delusional bitch wants to be queen of the SJW court, serving as judge, jury, and executioner

some guy gets fired for saying that Google should pursue diversity of ideas, not diversity of skin color and hoo-hahs, but this crazy antifa bitch is still working at Google?

>>136650709
Political belief is protected.
What he did likely doesn't qualify as political belief, but as a controversial statement which is kinda protected but not nearly as strongly.

What is defamation by any reasonable understanding is the willful misrepresentation of what he said to such a degree that it paints him as an unrepentant sexist/racist.

>>136650709
its really never been done in this context but what do you think about claiming just straight racial discrimination?

it probably won't get strict scrutiny because its straight, white males, but you might be able to slip it under intermediate and compare is to the VMI case with the military schools separated for men and women.

>>136631353
im blocked i have no idea why

>>136650709
Just a note, almost no states have political belief protection in their statute. I'm in a deep blue state and even we don't have it.

>>136650760
>>136651235
You won't get strict or intermediate because Google is a private company bro. Its all statutory in these situations. I've brought race discrim claims with next to nothing to prove it, so yea he could totallymake a prima facie showing (assuming Cali if like other blue states with lax pleading requirements).

If this was a government employer, it would be rational basis. I cannot imagine putting what the media is assuming to be a white male in a protected class.

>you're a sexist fascist racist, and there's no claim to back that up its defamation, or slander.
Those are opinion statements m8. Easy way to "back them up" sufficiently - any of the news reports talking about the memo. Defamation claim loses its legs imo

>>136636161
Shill hiding behind meme flag detected... Screenshots alone prove nothing, ARCHIVE & screenshot and print the archive link on the screenshot.

>>136651598
Opinions v. fact matters in other states? In VA we just go with a) did you say it, b) did it effect the victims reputation and if so, c) what are the damages.

Hell we even presume the statement to be damaging and false for lawyers and doctors. Presumption is on the speaker to show an affirmative defense like truth.

File: IMG_6747.jpg (407KB, 2048x1496px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 2048x1496px

>>136651208
Her now protected twitter
>Antifa
>Deleted LinkedIn
>Delted FB
God I hope she's literally shaking from harassment

>>136634892
*teleports behind you*
*deports your mexicans*
nothing personnel amigo

>>136651598
Also I remember jack and shit about Con law and jack left town, so thanks for the clarification.

File: pek.jpg (18KB, 639x639px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 639x639px

>>136631353

Russia intel /wikifags on here:
>Get the blacklists
>inform the people who are on them
>create the critical mass needed for group identity for them
>massive lawsuit
>destroy the g***le
>sew massive political chaos in the us/ possibly cause revolution

>>136651598

California DOES have a statute that MAY apply here. It's California Labor Code Section 1102. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=1101

File: 1502193100648.png (983KB, 968x1074px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 968x1074px

>>136631353

>>136636888
The reason they lash out like this is because they have already lost on scientific grounds. There is no defense left for the concept of "equality" other than to clamp down with force.

They are losing.

>>136631353
The fuck is Damore

>>136651598

Last link was to Code Section 1101.... Here is 1102

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=1102

>>136631353
It's fucked up. I read his memo, and really really middle of the road. Not really even conservative, just not SJW.

How did the world go so fucking crazy?

>>136653314
The guys name, James Damore.

>>136653314
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tujMw1NeB-w

>>136653267
This bitch is drunk with power.

File: milo.png (872KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 750x750px

>>136645676
he's right you bong. just look at gamergate:

who was the loudest, logical, and most representative voice for all the white males discriminated against by gamergate?

that's right, a homosexual jew

>>136653514
>How did the world go so fucking crazy?
On a serious note, check out link related if you haven't already:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM

Get em /pol/

>>136646532
Kek

>>136653281
They're losing the argument, but they have gained a lot of ground already.

Years of indoctrination, and normal ppl just ignoring them they're acting they've won already. And they're in the world's biggest businesses, controlling funding in the sciences, and anchored in the government.

They are pretty embedded. The best chance we have is Trump, and that their ideology is totally fucking nuts and off putting.

>>136631353
I refuse to believe commiefornia is doing anything right. Except wine. That's pretty good. But for all their supposedly abundant produce, I can still grow a better tomato in my back yard.

And their movies are unwatchable garbage now. There's better shit coming out of Jew York now.

>>136631353
>yfw a smart developer asks her for the whole list but intends to treat it as "google approved and potentially looking for work", hiring up their most effective workers while google's tech support moves to India.

File: chewtose.jpg (143KB, 962x1063px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 962x1063px

>>136653267
Oh man. this is gold.

The main reason GG took off was because of the crazy shit these SJW's say, and now, it's happening with Google.

>>136635052
and make a company with the money that fucks google in the ass. I dunno why.

File: IMG_2570.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>136634936
This faggot has a Rick and Morty bdsm fair picture on his insta.

So Reddit it hurts my anus.

>>136633911
idc about the other parts of the case, but this?
I hope you fucking archived it before google starts trying to destroy evidence.

on a scale of 1 to 10, this is a 9. This is a federal charge if it ever goes in front of a grand jury. Your employer is not allowed to talk to other employers about you other than confirming/denying if they worked for you or not.

>>136653267
I want my hands on that black list.

It's actually a list of intelligent, logic engineers not afraid to speak the truth. I can't think of a better hire.
The last thin I want is retard yesmen who only tell me what I want to hear instead of the bullshit that's actually going on.

File: IMG_2572.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>136655402
(((Figures.)))

>>136631353
Hey I know this dyke...well don't know her but see her riding her gay little scooter all the time

>>136655442
The fuck? It's surely a civil and not a criminal violation...

File: rabbit.jpg (86KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 640x425px

>>136653738
Underrated.

File: IMG_2575.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>136655614
kek

can "4chan" hire a lawyer and sue them ?

>>136653267
>im telling on you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bitch needs to grow up

>>136633911
>libs blacklist the most competent programmers over political bullshit
>they're forced to go work for foreign governments, organized crime, etc.
>hacking becomes basically unstoppable because the hackers have all the talent while the "good guys" just have lazy diversity hires

File: patrice-oneal-.jpg (81KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 600x399px

>>136631353
Where are you when we need you the most sweet prince?

File: All Our Heros Are Dead Generation of Revenge.png (746KB, 1100x1100px) Image search: [Google]

746KB, 1100x1100px

>>136635427
bingo. bid your time gents

>>136640565

A jew set them up to be sued.

They just now realized it.

It is too late for them.

File: 094.png (448KB, 600x635px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 600x635px

>>136656405
>4chan v Google
Best lawsuit ever.

>>136646644
That would be the best thing, actually. Get all of the white men to walk out and see who really does all of the work there.

>>136641564
>A tech behemoth was so rattled by one minor bland dissident in its own ranks that it had to initiate a witch hunt, with ensuing struggle sessions for everyone else, to restore the peace. If Google was a government, we would call this Maoism, and therein lies the problem: as Google takes over our e-mails, our cars, our news filtering and who knows what else they want to do, they increasingly become just that, a pseudo-government, and not exactly a libertarian one.
Couldn't sum up this whole situation any better.

>>136636398
this is perfect. saved.

Wow. Looking at this Kelly Ellis character..... she is a law suit waiting to happen. Is she at Medium or Google right now?

Doesn't really matter, though if she's at Medium....

If I'm James Damore's attorney I'd be looking to sue to Medium also. For tort of Intentional Interference with Economic Advantage (Medium gets to answer for the torts of its employees). Sue Medium, start discovery, find out of Kelly Ellis has anything to do with hiring there, and find out of she shared her "blacklist" with anybody else in the industry...

>>136631353
They're above the law. Laws are for peasants

>>136633911
what a psycho
is this the american left?

>>136639130
Eat a dick I clicked it 5 more times

>>136652542
>ex-google
Was she fired or is she really not working at google?
Can't hold Google responsible for things ex-employees do.

>>136648692
>8(a)(1) Coercive Statements (Threats, Promises of Benefits, etc.)

I guarantee he documented everything and even on Twitter there are archives of other Googlers attacking him and threatening him.

>>136641564
>Not that anyone still cares, but this episode should conclusively debunk any NRx spergery about how tech corporations will lead us into a glorious future of decentralized libertarianism.

It won't be the corporations that do lead us to decentralized libertarianism, it will be the reaction against their tyranny that will. It takes a corrupt and tyrannical Google for there to be demand for alternatives that are decentralized.

>>136636888
How can you repeal women's suffrage when 50% of the population is women and another 30% are white knight faggots? It's not going to happen. Which means women (and jews) will rule until everything goes to shit in a long slow collapse, at which point there may be a civilization reset, but that would probably be tied to some sort of global event like an ice age or massive volcano eruption, etc.

File: cuck.jpg (52KB, 330x500px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 330x500px

>>136632209

File: CAaOWwsUMAARy3j.png (41KB, 566x577px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 566x577px

>>136637054
>GG related pic

>>136631353
Badge of honor to be on that list

>>136660184

Just look at her Twitter feed! She's openly discussing a "blacklist" and sharing it with others. In the context of wherever she now works. When you are an employee and go on twitter discussing employment actions (making a blacklist of "bigots"), you are speaking for your employer whether they have authorized you to do so or not.

If she now works at Medium, and on behalf of Medium is now discussing blacklisting people in her industry as sexist, bigots, etc., then Medium gets to answer for that, if that = a cognizable wrong under applicable statutes or common law.

Could be an interesting case. I hear these SJW saying "speech has consequences" all the time, but they seem to forget that intentionally trying to end someone's livelihood is an actionable tort under the laws of most (all?) states. In your garden variety social media storm, you're dealing with potential defendants that don't have deep pockets because they are individuals.... But that doesn't mean there isn't an actionable case. Find a deep pocket and an actionable wrong, and the attorneys will come out of the woodwork to vindicate the right.

The left has been engaging in "law fare" for years. The right would be smart to open up the law suit spigot on all of this shit. Now, California has some crazy laws like the SLAPP laws that may create attorney fee liabilities for people that lose these suits, but other states don't have that.... and there are PLENTY of jurisdictional options to any smart litigant.

>>136641106
Can't gore Damore.

>>136642761
Because guess who controls the cameras and guess who is pro at getting word around.

>>136645676
>For every right wing collapse prediction
Nobody ever said it would be happening by now.

And for other Google employees who agree with Damore, if they were smart they would tomorrow form an internal Google group and publicly declare they are organizing to form a Union at Google. Once you are "organizing" for a Union, you get to talk loud and proud about work conditions and Google can't fire them without running afoul of the VERY pro-employee protections under the NLRB. Those protections are the result of 50 years of hard-core leftist attention and the NLRB have not, to my knowledge, ever been wielded by the right against the left. This Google thing appears to be a PRIME opportunity.... All you need is 30% of employees to agree to Unionize, and the internal Google poll I saw the other night showed 20-something % of Google employees agreed with Damore.... Conservative employee union at Google would be EPIC and a game changer. If it worked there, the Union would grow nation-wide like wild fire and then break out the pop corn as the left realizes their carefully laid NLRB plans have boomeranged in EPIC fashion.

>>136659701
I'm not sure, I don't think she's at Google.

https://twitter.com/justkelly_ok/status/893021330697736192

>>136633911
>there are social consequences for this behavior
well there might be legal consequences for THIS behavior

File: 1498451611364.jpg (118KB, 500x684px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 500x684px

>>136635451

>>136637077
Leno was litterally the hardest working man in comedy and deserves everthing he has. I used to hate him over that whole Letterman thing, but he was legitimately funny before the Tonight Show. He was witty and profound. What have you done for this world besides piss bottles by your gaming machine?

>>136634936
This whole crusade can be turned around on them.

Google knows these "lists" and this vigilante justice these SJW's are looking for is really bad for business, all the way around.

Right now it seems like they have been successful and the industry is behind them. It's not. Very few companies will ever want to expose themselves to the liability that comes with hiring someone who creates that kind of friction and animosity.

Only piece of shit progressive companies like MOZ will publicly court them, and even then that support will quickly fade as it starts to cause problems for these companies.

There will be an unspoken blacklist, created by common business sense, that says don't hire people who hold grudges and maintain Orwellian lists of coworkers.

This list making needs to be a focus and it needs to be attached to their names as much as possible. Every pre-employment search will reveal their blood lust and make them persona non grata for all but the lowest of tier companies. Two star G2Crowd ranking companies.

Remember basic SEO. Their names in titles and image with commonly searched related keywords.

>>136662497

So for that one, the first two bullet points could only be remedied by HR at Google, and if I was in a managerial role there, I would fire this guy yesterday. That tool felt empowered to say publiclly that he would would do harm to the company's employees and products based on personal political disagreement..... That Google hasn't and won't fire ADAM FLETCHER tells me everything I need to know about how rotten Google the company is, to the core. Lol. Come on Lads! <------------------- Investing Insight right here. Short Alphabet now.

>>136631353
List from yesterday of the people who leaked his name before it was ever reported in the media:

Cate Huston
Liz Fong-Jones
Kelly Ellis
John Reese
Colm Buckley
Coda Hale
Russel Brandom
Serenity Dee
Anthony Baxter
San wong
Stephen Patz
Jake Hamby
Eugene Villarreal
Natalie Lanoville

>>136663579

THIS. More Images Lads. More searchable Text including names, relevant info.

Very good point, Anon.

someone who's done some archives, please make a pastebin

File: 1502083897745.jpg (87KB, 819x460px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 819x460px

>>136631353
>Employer in youtube makes a well-reasoned claim backed with evidence and no rhetoric
>doesn't call anybody nigger
>doesn't call for people to get hanged by
>just claims that despite google being so "diverse" that they're all ideologically the same and opress anybody who doesn't think the same as them
>prove him right by firing him and blacklisting him
>start making list of people who support him and his ideas to blacklist and ruin their lives

Google is being destroyed. I wonder where all their archives of information is going to be sold to in the ensuing fire.

>>136633911
>>136633911
>always social consequences

Let's show him what that means guys

>>136663579

To your point, when Kelly Ellis's next employer does diligence on her, what will come up in her first.....um......Google results. (Own point dashed)

>>136655402
>>136655614
>>136656259

If it ain't ((( them ))), it's ((( them ))) sympathizers

>>136663654
>Liz Fong-Jones

Is this the google-tranny?

File: oh yes.gif (1MB, 326x256px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 326x256px

>tfw during the internal google witchhunt, m00t loses his cushy g+ job, and has to go back to working at a coffee shop.

>>136634475
This.

Blacklisting was something typically used to deny communists work.

>>136663579

Or Google's ADAM FLETCHER who says in WRITING in PUBLIC that he will he will fuck over other employees and company Products (!) to serve his social justice goals. Will copies of ADAM FLETCHER'S email come up when his name is searched?

File: 1412105762179.png (132KB, 396x454px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 396x454px

>>136633911

File: 53991-yqvxxgjwsc-1489997032.png (578KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 1200x630px

>>136654774
GoogleGate has started.

>>136664834
Someone really needs to email that little screed to the board of directors, preferably one of you who owns stock in google.

>>136664691
Do you think he would ever comback to running this shithole?
It cant be that easy to just let this all go, specially since it was a great part of his life, so i think he probably could come back if he gets booted from Guulag...

>>136664493
She is at the top, so of course a lot of the searches will be headlines from major outlets. Those are damage enough.

Those are good things. Most of the business/tech world is not filled with sniveling SJW's. They may have to keep up appearances, but leadership knows this shit is cancerous to innovation and growth.

This is a technological conquest. Companies concerned (genuinely) about feelings don't last.

We need to make sure that the smaller ones, the ones spreading the internal lists, the ones replying to her twitter asking for the list, everyone in the screenshots, those are the ones who will slip under the radar.

Those are the ones who's name needs to be tied to this as much as possible.

I've been on the inside of enough hiring to know that shit like this is cancerous long term.

I've seen dozens of candidates turned town due to controversy smaller than this. Of all races and genders, because of the assumed trouble they could potentially cause.

>>136664834
Write a blog post about the email. Use name sparingly in title, h1 header, some img alt tags, etc
Get backlinks, the more legit the better.
Repeat with different content.

>>136631353
She is my ex-fuckbuddy. She is NOT a Google employee. She, in fact, sued them a few years ago.

She was a great girl before the fame of teh lawsuit/twitter fuckery.

>>136663579

I'd like to know what what Sundar Pichai (CEO) and.....ahem..... Danielle Brown (VP of Diversity) and other management persons involved think of ADAM FLETCHER and the many other Google employees here in /pol/ identified, who are IN WRITING and IN PUBLIC (inter Google or what gets out Here) threatening other employees who don't engage in GroupThink.

Many of the SJWs in Google were taunting leadership to "mean what they say" about promoting Diversity. So, fire that guy, and indeed they did.

Ok. What about it Sundar and Danielle? Do you "mean what you say" when you say Google is open to all points of view? We here at /pol have Grade-A Evidence that a whole bunch of employees aren't on board with "what you say you mean."

Like James Damore, should these other offenders of Google policy in your midst be summarily terminated from employment?

Just wondering....

(you all know the answer..... SELL ALPHABET SHORT!)

>>136651227
Political belief is not protected in California or any other state to my knowledge. do you have a statute to cite? IANAL but pretty sure this, being in California, falls under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)

>>136645779

I wonder when they will fix this - https://www.google.ca/search?q=women+career+preferences&rlz=1C9BKJA_enCA715CA715&oq=women+&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i61l2j69i60j0.4776j0j7&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

>>136633911
>I DON'T CARE FOR THE GOOD OF THE COMPANY
>MY FEELINGS COME BEFORE THE COMPANY
>REEEEEE

What a fucking child unworthy of his position and it shows the internal culture of google will lead to a collapse. Good fucking riddance, people undervalue company culture far too often, you are either a business or you are a political movement. Pick one, you don't get both, you attempt to pick both, you lose both.

>>136662213
Unions just never happen in tech. These people are simultaneously afraid of getting fired and convinced that they're too brilliant to become one of those lazy union employees. There was once a person who tried for 15+ years to start a union at IBM (~400K employees) and at best could muster maybe 350-400 members.

>>136660635
Well, theres always violence.

>>136631353
This shit is fucking so illegal. Day of the rope soon.

>>136665972
What about being blacklisted because you voted for a political candidate? I have no doubts that being outed as a Trump voter would get you on this list at Google and every other Bay Area tech company.

>>136666666

>>136665972
The relevant statutes are linked:
http://www.shouselaw.com/employment/political-retaliation.html#2

Holy shit --- The script for this whole affair fucking writes itself:

We need some current Google employee to come foreword tomorrow and challenge the whole "People must feel free to express dissent" decree today from Google CEO, Sundar Pichai.

This employee should demand the immediate termination of all Google employees that have made overt threats against other employees based on dissenting viewpoints.

Of COURSE Google won't do that, and instead the mob at google will -- even if I waved this post in front of them before all of this --- go absolutely ape shit crazy about working with this brave soul and demand his ouster.

He then claims "constructive termination" by Google because they he can't do his job on account of being black listed.

Then he starts the MOACA against Google. MOACA means the Mother Of All Class Actions.

BOOM. Your welcome.

>>136633911
>*I will do anything I can possibly do to get 4/10 SJWs to suck my dick
>*I will do anything I can possibly do to get 4/10 SJWs to suck my dick
>*I will do anything I can possibly do to get 4/10 SJWs to suck my dick
>Got it bigots?

>>136666855

HOLY SHIT - Check those numbers on that....

GET IN HERE!!! First current Google Employee to take the /pol challenge wins the lawsuit lotttery baby!

You will (1) definitely be fired from Google, (2) definitely have a good fucking lawsuit, and (3) will have lasting infamy in /pol

>>136633911
>I don't care if you are a perfect fit or technically excellent or whatever

THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW THAT ADAM FLETCHER WILL SELL YOU AN INFERIOR SUBPAR PRODUCT BEFORE HE SELLS OUT HIS OWN DELUSIONS!

>>136654774
GG was sucessfully supressed and even now is associated in the normie sphere with 'no womyn in our precious vidya games' rather than journalism accountability. Let's hope this doesn't meet the same fate but I don't have high hopes.

>>136634475
Just like how "real communism" hasn't been tried,right? LMAO!!! Why does the left never take responsibility for anything?

Seriously,all you fucktards have is the identity politics of violent 50 IQ negroes,feminist cunts ,and degenerate faggots that dress up 8 year old boys like drag queens.


Fuck you leftist scum !! AND FUCK YOUR DELUSIONAL UPTOPIA!!

>>136667407
I would fire this retard on sight of this belief of his, they pay him incredibly well. Yet for some fucking reason he feels entitled to put himself before the company.

Absolutely sickening to me as someone who has studied business.

>>136634406
The hilarious thing is that the whole "gay frogs " thing that Alex gets bashed for is actually true.

>>136631615
lol alicec47 just wants the joocy deets to gossip

File: 1502171538764.jpg (471KB, 800x777px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 800x777px

>>136646435

Don't browse Neogaf. They had a thread once where they disowned family members for being Conservatives.

Neogaf is the 4chan of the left wing nuttery, its blood boiling.

Do you feel that? That's irony. USA breeded their own version of communism.

>>136639266
lmao. get a load of this beta cuck. son let me tell you something. if there is anything to pick up off 4chan let this piece of advice be it. the day you get over a womans looks and instead value what she has in her heart is the day you will either not be stuck in a cycle of psycho bitches with a woman of your dreams or the latter.

Do yourself a favor. heed my advise quick.

>>136634936
>>136633911

https://www.instagram.com/adamfblahblah/

>>136631353
>literally saying the bar is lowered for women

why would anyone think that

File: 1502168674774.jpg (26KB, 680x566px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 680x566px

>>136668182

And i believe that /pol itself has nothing on the mindfuckery and pure evil in that forum.

For all the shit we post here, most of us know its tongue in cheek, but there, its real, they really believe what they preach.

>>136633911
It amazes me how these people think they're so progressive and liberal but act like fascists at every turn.

This is a very obvious attempt at pushing what's socially acceptable,but they're moving the overton window so fast it's waking people up .

>we accept everyoneee!!!
>NO YOU MUST THINK LIKE US
Isn't it strange how they're making being straight abnormal and being a 50 year old fat (yayy fat acceptance!!) tranny wearing a Frozen mini skirt normal? Like peeling your dick like a banana is perfectly natural .

>>136631615
Something to keep an eye out for is WHAT kind of information they are sharing.

If it's just names, that's not much, but if someone there is gathering and disseminating more that could lead to something.

>>136640565
They've completely hijacked google and have massive censorship capabilities now
Look up Youtube's new terms of agreement
Quillette Magazine brought several scientists onto a publication confirming what he said is true and it got DDOSd
Its happening

File: Screenshot (1208).png (119KB, 1626x935px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1626x935px

>>136634936
I havent spoke to him, but im blocked.

>>136634901
You are onto something. They should.
But the department of labor under 0bama sued google to force more diversity. The dol might still be run by the same people. On the other hand the doj crd could also sue them, assuming sessions got rid of the obama sjws from there.

>>136631353
This is something everyone should look into by the way this also happened during the whole poaching agreement with Steve Jobs and Eric Schmidt back in the 2000's. And that law made them pay.

>>136655402
Looks like some pedo bondage shit to me. This guy a fan of almond sauce by chance?

>>136635014
6. Refuse to protect from harrassment and from threats of violence. People making the threats were not terminated.

>>136642117

>Shitty post
>Flag checks out

After killing all the jews, how do you want to be cooked in the oven? Raw, medium rare or leaf?

>>136644534
Does anyone have her insta? We can meme the fuck out of her.

>>136666528

It doesn't matter if an actual union never materializes. Saying you want to discuss working conditions in the guise of unionization gives you extra speech protections. If a bunch of conservative googlers were afraid of retaliation from management (pretty reasonable fear), talking about diversity policies in the context of workplace conditions gives them more cover.