Capitalist or socialist?

natsoc is a mix of both

>>136623520
I figured that, I also like that idea. But I just wanted see what pol has to say.

Economically centrist. Tolerate Government intervention for strategic sectors, but value the allowance flow of the market and respect it as well.

>>136623711
So i am neither?

>>136623711
But if we go after Hitler's definition of a socialist?

>>136623520
indeed! companies will not be globalist; they will be nationalist, as in belonging to the people who possess the ingenuity, creativity, intellect and discipline to manifest industry. the ideas can be shared with others but the sole proprietorship belongs to the nation. unlike today where every idea created by Whites has been appropriated as a tool to eliminate Whites. in WWII, he knew that a technology ONLY possessed by his nation, a technology which was an edge, a Krieg entscheidend, was the only way to protect national interests. as hurtful as it may be to admit, n. korea runs a very close second to the concept; and is fighting the rothschild machine to remain sovereign