really make u think

>>136583403

>women: we need certain special gender-based privileges because women are inherently disadvantaged as compared to men

>googleman: women need certain special gender-based privileges because women are inherently disadvantaged as compared to men

>women again: EXECUTE HIM

>>136583403
Women: Men are so stupid when it comes to emotions and people skills

Googleman: Men are so stupid when it comes to emotions and people skills

Women: OFF WITH HIS HEAD

what

>>136583935

But the Google guy is a retard and a cuck if he said that. It shouldn't be the responsibility of men and society to lift women up to our level just because they biologically aren't good enough.

>>136586221
Learn to read, the first is an appeal, the second is a stated fact.

>>136586546

If the guy more or less said this:

>googleman: women need certain special gender-based privileges because women are inherently disadvantaged as compared to men

Then he is a retard and a cuck. Ignoring other things people may or may not say.

>>136586221
Googleman never said that, he said women on a general level but not individual level, are better at some things than men and I remember the gist being Google should simply take advantage of that.

>>136586107
You should learn about this because you are missing something nice here.

Its about the google 'manifesto' whatever

>>136583403
Googleman is my new favorite superhero.

>>136587194
ohh so this is why poltards are chimpingout about google

>>136587352
When I grow up, I want to be just like googleman

>>136587683
actually it's more like google chimping out about /pol/tards

>>136583935
That's a strawman. Feminists believe that the disadvantage of women is not inherent but a product of cultural bias against women.

Googleman on the other hand implied (supposedly) that the disadvantage is because of biological differences.