Tech companies should be regulated like utilities

>>136577727
neither google, facebook, or twitter are tech companies.
they are websites.

a tech company is lockheed martin.
google is a basement dweller become big.

>>136577727
The power company can't refuse to supply you power because they don't like your politics. Similarly, Google, YouTube and Facebook should not have the leeway to do so because they are effectively utility providers.

if you disagree you have no right to call yourself a fascist

File: 1498372075076.jpg (252KB, 1200x844px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1200x844px

>>136578503
Based jap.

>>136577727

I was really tired of google being innovative anyway. I miss Yahoo. Gov can make it more like that.

>>136577727
The whole of the companies do not need to be regulated as such, but certain sectors do, because certain parts of their business model essentially do function as utilities/public goods. Producing new hardware, software, etc. isn't really a utility, but providing a platform for search, video hosting, etc. kind of is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good

File: 1496103907710.png (569KB, 1139x1381px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 1139x1381px

>>136578717
Yeah I'll miss Google censorship too when it's gone

>>136577727
How come I haven't heard more about this "better deal" plan? I only got to make fun of the one where they copied Trump economically.

>>136578503
This is a decent solution.